Mr. Jeremy Exley Profile

Jeremy Exley

at Donaldson Co Inc

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (1)

This will count as one of your downloads.

You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).

DOWNLOAD NOW

This content is available for download via your institution's subscription. To access this item, please sign in to your personal account.

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Keep me signed in

No SPIE account? Create an account

Proceedings Article | 10 May 2005 Paper

Removal of low concentrations of acid gases: issues and solutions

Andrew Dallas, Lefei Ding, Jeremy Exley, Jon Joriman, Brian Hoang, Jonathan Parsons, Kevin Seguin, Dustin Zastera

Proceedings Volume 5752, (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.599815

KEYWORDS: Gases, Carbon, Humidity, Sensors, Contamination, Lithography, Network architectures, Fluctuations and noise, Ions, Industrial chemicals

Read Abstract +

Part per billion concentrations of acid gases such as SO_x and NO_x have been detected in both high purity gases and CDA lines. These contaminants can have deleterious effects on a number of high purity applications such as the optics found in lithography equipment steppers, scanners, and inspection tools. In addition, acidic gases have also been shown to reduce the life of masks and reticles, decrease fuel cell output due to catalyst poisoning, and cause hard disk drive crashes due to surface contamination and corrosion. Consequently, acid gas control in these applications has become a critical part of the required filtration system. SO_x concentrations are typically used as the baseline for acid gas filter exposure guidelines and performance testing. However, this approach has been shown to provide poor filter life predictions, which has been attributed to the presence of other acidic and organic contaminants that compete with SO_x for the available adsorption sites. Equally important, the type of sorbents and methods used to control acid gases can significantly affect the ability to remove SO_x. In this work we will compare the performance of various sorbents, structures, and methods for the removal of SO_x and NO_x.

My Library

You currently do not have any folders to save your paper to! Create a new folder below.

Folder Name

Folder Description

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks. You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*

*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please sign in to access your institution's subscriptions.

To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on SPIE.org.

ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.

Organizational Username

Organizational Password

Show/Hide Password

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members:

Non-members: ADD TO CART

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years