Mr. Fabian León Profile

Fabian León

at Univ Industrial de Santander

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (2)

This will count as one of your downloads.

You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).

DOWNLOAD NOW

This content is available for download via your institution's subscription. To access this item, please sign in to your personal account.

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Keep me signed in

No SPIE account? Create an account

Proceedings Article | 4 April 2022 Poster + Presentation + Paper

Towards reduction of expert bias on Gleason score classification via a semi-supervised deep learning strategy

Miguel Plazas, Raúl Ramos-Pollán, Fabian León, Fabio Martínez

Proceedings Volume 12032, 120322O (2022) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2611517

KEYWORDS: Visualization, Statistical modeling, Cancer, Visual process modeling, Solid state lighting, Data modeling, Tissues, Solids, Prostate cancer, Imaging systems

Read Abstract +

Gleason Score (GS) is the principal histological grading system to support the quantification of cancer aggressiveness. This analysis is carried out by expert pathologists but with reported evidence of moderate agreement among pathologists (kappa values less than 0.5). This fact can be prone to errors that directly affect the diagnosis and subsequent treatment. Current deep learning approaches have been proposed to support such visual pattern quantification but there exist a remarked on expert annotations that overfit representations. Besides, the supervised representation is limited to model the high reported visual variability intra Gleason grades. This work introduces a semi-Supervised Learning (SSL) approach that initially uses a reduced set of annotated visual patterns to built several GS deep representations. Then, the set of deep models automatically propagates annotations to unlabeled patches. The most confident predicted samples are used to retrain the ensemble deep representation. Over a patch-based framework with a total of 26259 samples, coded from 886 tissue microarrays, the proposed approach achieved remarkable results between grades three and four. Interestingly, the proposed SSL with only the 10% of samples achieves more general representation, achieving averages scores of ~75.93% and ∼ 71.88% concerning two expert pathologists

Proceedings Article | 3 January 2020 Paper

An inception deep architecture to differentiate close-related Gleason prostate cancer scores

Fabian León, Miguel Plazas, Fabio Martínez

Proceedings Volume 11330, 113300D (2020) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2547113

KEYWORDS: Prostate cancer, Cancer, Tissues, Tumors

Read Abstract +

Histopathological tissue analysis is the most effective and definitive method to prognosis cancer and stratify the aggressiveness of the disease. The Gleason Score (GS) is the most powerful grading system based on architectural tumor pattern quantification. This score characterizes cancer tumor tissue, such as the level of cell differentiation on histopathological images. The reported GS is described as the sum of two principal grades present in a particular image, and ranged from 6 (cancer grow slowly) to 10 (cancer cells spread more rapidly). A main drawback of GS is the pathological dependency on histopathological region stratification, which strongly impacts the clinical procedure to treat the disease. The agreement among experts has been quantified with a kappa index of: ~0.71. Even worse, a higher uncertainty is reported for intermediate grade stratification. This work presents a like-inception deep architecture that is able to differentiate between intermediate and close GS grades. Each image herein evaluated was split-up into regional patches that correspond to a single GS grade. A set of training patches were augmented according to appearance image variations of each grade. Then, a transfer learning scheme was implemented to adapt a bi-Gleason tumor patterns prediction among close levels. The proposed approach was evaluated on public set of 886 tissue H&E stained images with different GS grades, achieving an average accuracy of 0.73% between grades three and four.

My Library

You currently do not have any folders to save your paper to! Create a new folder below.

Folder Name

Folder Description

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks. You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*

*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please sign in to access your institution's subscriptions.

To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on SPIE.org.

ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.

Organizational Username

Organizational Password

Show/Hide Password

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members:

Non-members: ADD TO CART

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years