Paper
17 December 2003 Mask industry assessment: 2003
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Microelectronics industry leaders routinely name mask technology and mask supply issues of cost and cycle time as top issues of concern. A survey was initiated in 2002 with support from International SEMATECH (ISMT) and administered by SEMI North America to gather information about the mask industry as an objective assessment of its overall condition.1 This paper presents the results of the second annual survey which is an enhanced version of the inaugural survey building upon its strengths and improving the weak points. The original survey was designed with the input of member company mask technologists, merchant mask suppliers, and industry equipment makers. The assessment is intended to be used as a baseline for the mask industry and the microelectronics industry to gain a perspective on the technical and business status of the critical mask industry. An objective is to create a valuable reference to identify strengths and opportunities and to guide investments on critical-path issues. As subsequent years are added, historical profiles can also be created. This assessment includes inputs from ten major global merchant and captive mask manufacturers representing approximately 80% of the global mask market (using revenue as the measure) and making this the most comprehensive mask industry survey ever. The participating companies are: Compugraphics, Dai Nippon Printing, Dupont Photomask, Hoya, IBM, Infineon, Intel, Taiwan Mask Company, Toppan, and TSMC. Questions are grouped into five categories: General Business Profile Information; Data Processing; Yields and Yield loss Mechanisms; Delivery Time; and Returns and Services. Within each category are a multitude of questions that create a detailed profile of both the business and technical status of the mask industry.
© (2003) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Kurt R. Kimmel "Mask industry assessment: 2003", Proc. SPIE 5256, 23rd Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology, (17 December 2003); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.517438
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 9 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Photomasks

Binary data

Data processing

Optical proximity correction

Pellicles

Manufacturing

Microelectronics

RELATED CONTENT

The 2002 to 2010 mask survey trend analysis
Proceedings of SPIE (March 17 2011)
Mask industry assessment trend analysis
Proceedings of SPIE (May 27 2009)
Mask industry assessment: 2006
Proceedings of SPIE (October 20 2006)
Mask industry assessment trend analysis
Proceedings of SPIE (June 21 2006)
Mask Industry Assessment: 2007
Proceedings of SPIE (October 23 2007)
Mask industry assessment trend analysis
Proceedings of SPIE (May 02 2008)
Mask industry assessment: 2002
Proceedings of SPIE (December 27 2002)

Back to Top