Cloud coverage constitutes a huge problem for Earth observation satellites constellations. It leads to a significant proportion of unusable images that have to be rescheduled, which represents both a waste of time and money. Agile targeting systems combined with satellite planning optimization and weather forecasting allow to minimize the number of cloudy images. As demonstrated earlier by the authors, the computational efficiency of optical flow forecasting approaches allows to build plans with up-to-date forecasts with good spatial and temporal resolutions. This approach, developed and implemented in the field of view of a unique geostationary satellite, is in this work evaluated at worldwide scale by fusion of several geostationary satellites’ fields of view. Using a specific simulation framework, we evaluated the efficiency of this method against a more classical Numerical Weather Prediction model for 24 hours scenarios. Results showed that the optical flow method allows to reduce the rejection proportion of such scenario from thirty to forty percents.
Cloud coverage is an important issue for Earth observation satellite programs as remote sensing images are useless if their cloud fraction is too high or if specific targets are not visible. These flawed acquisitions must be reintroduced in the waiting list, leading to significant delays. Agile satellites are able to choose between several targets according to various priority parameters, including cloud coverage forecasting. This paper assesses a short-term cloud forecasting method which uses time series acquired by a geosynchronous satellite and a cloud motion vector processing technique to predict the evolution of the cloud coverage up to six hours in the future. Using several SPOT/Pléiades acquisition dates from 2015 to 2017, and the corresponding Meteosat-8 datasets, cloud fraction forecasts have been produced for time horizons ranging from fifteen minutes to six hours, and compared to other forecast results obtained using two classical numerical weather prediction (NWP) models: GFS and ICON. Satellite-based forecast showed several advantages compared to these methods. First, the algorithm is much faster – a few minutes, whereas NWP models need several hours to build a forecast – allowing to get a result quickly from fresh dataset. Moreover, forecasts obtained with satellite images have a better time resolution – 15 minutes instead of one hour – and outperform GFS and ICON results in terms of prediction accuracy for horizons less than 3.5 hours.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.