Dr. Christopher J. Raymond Profile

Dr. Christopher J. Raymond

Director Technology Development

SPIE Involvement:

Conference Program Committee | Author | Editor

Publications (28)

Proceedings Article | 10 April 2013 Paper

Photoluminescence metrology for LED characterization in high volume manufacturing

Christopher Raymond, Zhiqiang Li

Proceedings Volume 8681, 86810P (2013) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2013624

KEYWORDS: Light emitting diodes, Semiconducting wafers, Metrology, Manufacturing, Luminescence, Metalorganic chemical vapor deposition, Photons, Process control, Spatial resolution, Physics

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 24 March 2006 Paper

Diffraction signature analysis methods for improving scatterometry precision

Mike Littau, Darren Forman, Josh Bruce, Christopher Raymond, Steven Hummel

Proceedings Volume 6152, 615236 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.656729

KEYWORDS: Diffraction, Polarization, Scatterometry, Critical dimension metrology, Metrology, Analytical research, Measurement devices, Etching, Light scattering, Semiconductors

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 24 March 2006 Paper

Effect of grating pitch variation on scatterometry measurements

Darren Forman, Mike Littau, Christopher Raymond, Steven Hummel

Proceedings Volume 6152, 61524D (2006) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.656615

KEYWORDS: Scatterometry, Critical dimension metrology, Photomasks, Lithography, Photoresist materials, Scatter measurement, Diffraction gratings, Diffraction, Data modeling, Nano opto mechanical systems

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 24 March 2006 Paper

Dome scatterometry for the measurement of advanced geometry semiconductor devices

Christopher Raymond, Mike Littau, Darren Forman, Steven Hummel

Proceedings Volume 6152, 61521I (2006) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.656466

KEYWORDS: Scatterometry, Domes, Scatter measurement, Silicon, Clouds, Polarization, Diffraction, Atomic force microscopy, Critical dimension metrology, Semiconductors

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 24 March 2006 Paper

Back end of line metrology control applications using scatterometry

Linda Towidjaja, Christopher Raymond, Mike Littau, Darren Forman, Steven Hummel

Proceedings Volume 6152, 61521X (2006) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.656515

KEYWORDS: Scatterometry, Dielectrics, Atomic force microscopy, Etching, Critical dimension metrology, Metals, Semiconducting wafers, Back end of line, Optical properties, Metrology

Read Abstract +

Scatterometry is a novel metrology approach for process control that has recently been gaining more momentum in microlithography applications. The method can simultaneously measure Critical Dimension (CD), Side Wall Angle (SWA), and thickness of more than one layer. It analyzes the scattered and diffracted light from a periodic array of lines or holes that represent the surface structure of the measured sample. Scatterometry provides a non-destructive technique offering high precision and stability along with high tool-uptime performance. As such, it offers an excellent approach for real-time high volume production control with significant advantages as compared to traditional technologies such as CD-SEM and Profilometry. As the structure dimension shrinks considerably, producing high precision results becomes more critical. To date, reports on the deployment of scatterometry in real production environment have focused on Front End of Line (FEOL) applications such as STI and Gate. However, Back End of Line (BEOL) process control has not been widely reported. In this work, we will discuss the results of our study specifically for metal trench and contact layer on both patterned and etched wafers for 65nm technology node. We will also report the comparison between Scatterometry results to Critical Dimension Scanning Electron Microscope (CD-SEM) and Atomic Force Microscope (AFM). Finally we will provide a statistical analysis of our scatterometry results including precision, fleet precision, and TMU analysis. In contrast to the relatively simple stacks that comprise a FEOL structure, BEOL layers are typically complex structures with a large number of underlying layers. Generation of simulated scatterometry signatures that constitute a reference library for complex structures can require long computational times and result in large file sizes. To mitigate the computational overhead, it is necessary to intelligently decide which parameters to fix and which to vary. An additional complication is presented due to similarities in the optical properties of BEOL stack materials, which can introduce potential for parameter cross-correlation in the measurement. We will discuss methodologies for optimally selecting parameters to be fixed or varied to minimize these effects.

Proceedings Article | 10 May 2005 Paper

Metrology of deep trench etched memory structures using 3D scatterometry

Peter Reinig, Rene Dost, Manfred Moert, Thomas Hingst, Ulrich Mantz, Jasen Moffitt, Sushil Shakya, Christopher Raymond, Mike Littau

Proceedings Volume 5752, (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.599342

KEYWORDS: Scatterometry, Semiconducting wafers, Scanning electron microscopy, 3D modeling, 3D metrology, Metrology, Process control, 3D applications, Scattering, Scatter measurement

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 10 May 2005 Paper

Lithography tool qualification using angular scatterometry

Mike Littau, Christopher Raymond, Prasad Dasari, Jasen Moffitt, Sushil Shakya

Proceedings Volume 5752, (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.600413

KEYWORDS: Lithography, Scatterometry, Semiconducting wafers, Metrology, Optical lithography, Model-based design, Scanners, Process control, Photoresist materials, Diffraction gratings

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 10 May 2005 Paper

Metal etcher qualification using angular scatterometry

Igor Jekauc, Jasen Moffitt, Sushil Shakya, Elizabeth Donohue, Prasad Dasari, Christopher Raymond, Mike Littau

Proceedings Volume 5752, (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.598828

KEYWORDS: Semiconducting wafers, Etching, Metals, Scatterometry, Polymers, Profilometers, Scanning electron microscopy, Critical dimension metrology, Metrology, Tin

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 24 May 2004 Paper

Successful application of angular scatterometry to process control in sub-100-nm DRAM device

Jin-ah Kim, Seong-Jin Kim, Soo-Bok Chin, Seok-Hwan Oh, Doo-Hoon Goo, Suk-Joo Lee, Sang-Gyun Woo, Han-Ku Cho, Woo-Sung Han, Joo-Tae Moon, Christopher Raymond, Michael Littau, Byungjoo Youn, Chang-Jin Sohn

Proceedings Volume 5375, (2004) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.536312

KEYWORDS: Scatterometry, Critical dimension metrology, Scanning electron microscopy, Scatter measurement, Metrology, Semiconducting wafers, Light scattering, Process control, Light sources, Time metrology

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 24 May 2004 Paper

Comparison of solutions to the scatterometry inverse problem

Christopher Raymond, Michael Littau, Andrei Chuprin, Simon Ward

Proceedings Volume 5375, (2004) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.538662

KEYWORDS: Inverse problems, Scatterometry, Light scattering, Remote sensing, Scattering, Optimization (mathematics), Inverse optics, Semiconducting wafers, Critical dimension metrology, Scatter measurement

Read Abstract +

Scatterometry is a novel optical metrology that has received considerable attention in the silicon industry in the past few years. Based on the analysis of light scattered from a periodic sample, scatterometry technology can be thought of as consisting of two parts known as the forward problem and the inverse problem. In the forward problem, a scatterometer “signature” is measured. The signature is simply the measured optical response of the scattering features to some incident illumination, like laser light. In the inverse problem, the signature is analyzed in order to determine the parameters (such as linewidth, thickness, profile, etc) of the scattering features. Typically a rigorous electrodynamic model is used in the solution to the inverse problem, but due to the complexity of the model there is no direct analytic solution. Instead, a variety of numerical methods to solve the inverse problem have been proposed and utilized. The earliest widely used method of solution to the inverse problem involved the generation of a “library” of scatter signatures corresponding to discrete parameter combinations of the structure being measured. Once the library was generated, it was then searched in order to determine the best match to the measured signature. The parameters of the best match were then reported as the parameters of the measured signature. As the technology matured, other methods such as model optimization techniques also emerged. In fact, a variety of alternate techniques have been explored and reported, but a general study comparing the results (and hence the strengths and weaknesses) of the various techniques has yet to be performed. In this research, we shall report results from using several different solutions to the inverse problem on two applications (patterned resist and etched poly). The solution methods shall include the classic library search method as well as three common optimization methods. The results will show that each technique has strengths and weaknesses. For example, the library search methods are generally the most robust but also the most time consuming, and the optimization methods, while fast, are prone to reporting a local but not global minima.

Proceedings Article | 26 June 2003 Paper

Evaluating scanner lens spherical aberration using scatterometer

Changan Wang, Gary Zhang, Colin Tan, Chris Atkinson, Mark Boehm, Jay Brown, David Godfrey, Michael Littau, Christopher Raymond

Proceedings Volume 5040, (2003) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.485437

KEYWORDS: Monochromatic aberrations, Spherical lenses, Scanners, Critical dimension metrology, Optical lithography, Semiconducting wafers, Phase measurement, Scatter measurement, Scanning electron microscopy, Distortion

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 26 June 2003 Paper

Scatterometer-based scanner fingerprinting technique (ScatterLith) and its applications in image field and ACLV analysis

Changan Wang, Gary Zhang, Stephen DeMoor, Mark Boehm, Michael Littau, Christopher Raymond

Proceedings Volume 5040, (2003) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.485434

KEYWORDS: Monochromatic aberrations, Scanners, Critical dimension metrology, Image analysis, Lithography, Image processing, Error analysis, Optical lithography, Manufacturing, Semiconducting wafers

Read Abstract +

The ability to accurately, quickly and automatically fingerprint the lenses of advanced lithography scanners has always been a dream for lithographers. This is truly necessary to understand error sources of ACLV, especially when the optical lithography is pushed into 130 nm regimes and beyond. This dream has become a reality at Texas Instruments with the help of scatterometry. This paper describes the development and characterization of the scatterometer based scanner lens testing technique (ScatterLith) and its application in 193 nm and 248 nm scanner lens fingerprinting. The entire procedure includes a full field exposure through focus in a micro stepping mode, scatterometer measurement of focus matrix, image field analysis and mapping of lens curvature, astigmatism, spherical aberration, line-through pitch analysis and ACLV analysis (i.e. across chip line width variation). ACLV has been directly correlated with image field deviation, lens aberration and illumination source errors. Examples are given to illustrate its applications in accurate focus monitoring with enhanced capability of dynamic image field and lens signature mapping for the latest ArF and KrF scanners used in manufacturing environment for 130nm node and beyond. Analysis of CD variation across a full scanner field is done through a step-by-step image field correction procedure. ACLV contribution of each image field error can be quantified separately. The final across slit CD signature is further analyzed against possible errors from illumination uniformity, illumination pupil fill, and higher order projection lens aberrations. High accuracy and short cycle time make this new technique a very effective tool for in-line real time monitoring and scanner qualification. Its fingerprinting capability also provides lithography engineers a comprehensive understanding of scanner performance for CD control and tool matching. Its extendibility to 90nm and beyond is particularly attractive for future development and manufacturing requirements.

Proceedings Article | 2 June 2003 Paper

Applications of angular scatterometry for the measurement of multiply periodic features

Christopher Raymond, Michael Littau, Byoungjoo Youn, Chang-Jin Sohn, Jin Kim, Young Kang

Proceedings Volume 5038, (2003) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.488116

KEYWORDS: Scatterometry, 3D modeling, Scatter measurement, Scanning electron microscopy, Light scattering, Diffraction, Data modeling, Semiconducting wafers, 3D metrology, Polarization

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 16 July 2002 Paper

Novel implementations of scatterometry for lithography process control

Michael Littau, Christopher Raymond, Christopher Gould, Christy Gambill

Proceedings Volume 4689, (2002) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.473490

KEYWORDS: Lithography, Scatterometry, Diffraction, Diffraction gratings, Semiconducting wafers, Process control, Photoresist materials, Light scattering, Data modeling, Critical dimension metrology

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 22 August 2001 Paper

Scatterometry for shallow trench isolation (STI) process metrology

Christopher Raymond, Michael Littau, Richard Markle, Matthew Purdy

Proceedings Volume 4344, (2001) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.436798

KEYWORDS: Semiconducting wafers, Etching, Scatterometry, Scanning electron microscopy, Scatter measurement, Silicon, Atomic force microscopy, Metrology, Light scattering, Diffraction

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 22 August 2001 Paper

Asymmetric line profile measurement using angular scatterometry

Christopher Raymond, Michael Littau, Todd Pitts, Peter Nagy

Proceedings Volume 4344, (2001) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.436769

KEYWORDS: Scatterometry, Scatter measurement, Semiconducting wafers, Light scattering, Diffraction, Diffraction gratings, Photoresist materials, Atomic force microscopy, Metrology, Polarization

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 22 August 2001 Paper

Gauge control for sub-170-nm DRAM product features

Neal Lafferty, Christopher Gould, Michael Littau, Christopher Raymond

Proceedings Volume 4344, (2001) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.436754

KEYWORDS: Etching, Critical dimension metrology, Semiconducting wafers, Tolerancing, Lithography, Scatter measurement, Scanning electron microscopy, Metrology, Titanium, Diffraction

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 2 June 2000 Paper

Scatterometry for the measurement of metal features

Christopher Raymond, Stephen Farrer, Scott Sucher

Proceedings Volume 3998, (2000) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.386466

KEYWORDS: Semiconducting wafers, Scatterometry, Metals, Scatter measurement, Oxides, Atomic force microscopy, Diffraction, Metrology, Etching, Tin

Read Abstract +

Scatterometry, an optical metrology based on the principle of diffraction, has received a considerable amount of attention in the literature in the past decade. By measuring and analyzing the light scattered, or diffracted, from a patterned periodic sample, the dimensions of the sample itself can be measured. Applications of the technique have included the characterization of photomasks, the monitoring of focus, dose and the post exposure bake process, and even the characterization of three-dimensional features such as contact hole and DRAM arrays. Like other optical metrologies, scatterometry measurements are rapid, non-destructive and highly repeatable. The most widely reported scatterometry data have been for measurements of developed photoresist and etched poly-Si gratings. Although these types of features represent a considerable portion of a typical process, other types of materials, such as metal layers, are also commonly present, and are important to characterize. In this work scatterometry measurement data from metal layers will be presented. The scatterometer used in this investigation was the well-known 2- (Theta) variety, where the scatter signature is obtained by measuring the diffraction efficiency of a particular order as the incident angle is varied. The analysis involved comparing the measured data to a library of theoretical scatter signatures (generated a priori from rigorous coupled wave theory) to find the best match. The measurements were performed at two process steps: pre-etch, where the patterned features were resist gratings on uniform metal layers, and post-etch/strip, where the patterned features were etched metal gratings. The composition of the metal stack starts with a silicon substrate, upon which is deposited 3000 A of oxide, followed by 500 A of Ti, 6000 A of AlCu and 250 A of TiN. A BARC layer and then the photoresist were deposited on this stack for patterning. The nominal patterned dimensions were 350 nm lines in 800 nm pitch gratings. Overall the sample set for this study included some 24 wafers with various AlCu layer thicknesses, providing a broad wafer split for analysis. Measurement results for linewidth and the various layer thicknesses will be presented, and comparisons to AFM measurements will be made. Results from assessing the repeatability of the 2-(Theta) scatterometer will also be presented, and indicate sub-nanometer precision (6-(sigma) ) for linewidth measurements. In addition, the practical aspects of the method, such as the modeling time required to generate the signature library as well as measurement speed and throughput will be presented.

Proceedings Article | 19 July 1999 Paper

Milestones and future directions in applications of optical scatterometry

Christopher Raymond

Proceedings Volume 10294, 1029408 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.351670

KEYWORDS: Scatterometry

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 30 October 1998 Paper

Application of optical scatterometry to microelectronics and flat panel display processing

John McNeil, Stephen Coulombe, Petre-Catalin Logofatu, Christopher Raymond, S. Sohail Naqvi, George Collins

Proceedings Volume 3426, (1998) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.328456

KEYWORDS: Scatterometry, Semiconducting wafers, Scanning electron microscopy, Metrology, Microelectronics, Diffraction, Flat panel displays, Scatter measurement, Critical dimension metrology, Diffraction gratings

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 7 July 1997 Paper

Resist and etched line profile characterization using scatterometry

Christopher Raymond, S. Sohail Naqvi, John McNeil

Proceedings Volume 3050, (1997) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.275944

KEYWORDS: Scatterometry, Scanning electron microscopy, Diffraction, Diffraction gratings, Statistical modeling, Photoresist materials, Semiconducting wafers, Metrology, Cadmium, Data modeling

Read Abstract +

In previous applications scatterometry has shown promise as a metrology for several process measurements. The linewidths of both resist and etched features, and the thicknesses of several underlying film layers, have been accurately characterized using the technique1 . Up until recently these results have been obtained by assuming the features being measured possessed a nominally square profile. However, as metrology tolerances shrink in proportion to device dimensions, errors in the measurement technique due to non-square line profiles could become significant. To test the ability of the scatterometry technique to measure non-square profiles, two models have been developed. The first profile model assumes the top and bottom corners of a resist line can be approximated as a segment of some circle with a given radius. With the center of the circle fixed in space by the overall height of the resist and a nominal linewidth, the sidewall of the line is then modeled as the tangent line that connects the two circles. This particular model can accommodate both overhanging (<900) and trapezoidal sidewalls (<900) with just four parameters: the radius of the top and bottom corners, and the nominal top and bottom linewidths. Comparisons between cross-section SEM images and scatterometry profiles using this model will be presented. The second model, which we call the "stovepipe' model, is a modified version of a simple trapezoid model and has applications to etched features. In this model an etched line is parameterized by assuming the trapezoidal portion of the sidewall starts at some distance below the top of the line, with the top portion of the line remaining square. In this manner an etched profile can be modeled with four parameters: the overall height of the etched line, the nominal etched linewidth, and the overall height and sidewall angle of the trapezoid layer. Once again, scatterometry profile results in comparison to cross-section SEM images will be presented. The use of both of these models has reduced the difference between scatterometry and SEM CD measurements. For example, the average difference of twelve resist CD measurements, when compared to crosssection SEM measurements, improves from 19.3 to 10.1 urn when the full profile model is incorporated. Keywords: metrology, diffraction, optical metrology, scatterometry, process control

Proceedings Article | 21 May 1996 Paper

Scatterometry for CD measurements of etched structures

Christopher Raymond, S. Sohail Naqvi, John McNeil

Proceedings Volume 2725, (1996) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.240133

KEYWORDS: Scatterometry, Semiconducting wafers, Scatter measurement, Scanning electron microscopy, Metrology, Diffraction, Critical dimension metrology, Etching, Photoresist materials, Light scattering

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 21 May 1996 Paper

Multiparameter CD measurements using scatterometry

Christopher Raymond, Michael Murnane, Steven Prins, S. Sohail Naqvi, John McNeil, Jimmy Hosch

Proceedings Volume 2725, (1996) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.240121

KEYWORDS: Scatterometry, Semiconducting wafers, Scanning electron microscopy, Scatter measurement, Metrology, Ellipsometry, Diffraction, Photoresist processing, Oxides, Diffraction gratings

Read Abstract +

Scatterometry, the characterization of periodic structures via diffracted light analysis, is shown to be a versatile metrology technique applicable to several processes involved in microlithography. Unlike contemporary inspection technologies, such as scanning force microscopy (SFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), scatterometry is rapid, non- destructive, inexpensive and has the potential for use in-situ. Furthermore, the flexibility of the technique allows it to be used for a number of different process measurements. In the production of a sub-micron microelectronic device, a typical series of process steps could involve the deposition of a poly-Si layer on oxide, followed by the application of an anti- reflection coating (ARC) and resist layer. Thus in total there are four parameters which will ultimately affect the overall quality of subsequent processing: the linewidth of the resist, the resist height, and the thicknesses of the ARC and poly-Si. We have demonstrated that the scatterometer measurement technique is robust to changes in the thickness of underlying films. Indeed, there is sufficient information in one signature to determine four parameters at once, even when the linewidth dimensions are as small as 0.16 micrometer and the poly-Si thickness is on the order of 2500 angstrom. Results from determining these dimensions on several wafers show excellent agreement between the scatterometry measurements and measurements made with other metrology instruments (top down and cross-section SEM, and ellipsometer). For example, the average bias between nine scatterometry and cross-section SEM measurements on nominal 0.35 micrometer lines is minus 1.7 nm; for 0.25 micrometer lines, the average difference is minus 7.3 nm. In addition, results from measuring the sidewall angle (a fifth parameter) from these same scatter signatures indicate that the resist profiles at optimum focus and exposure are near-vertical. Finally, the dynamic repeatability of this technique is shown to be excellent for all of the parameters measured (linewidth, resist height, ARC thickness and poly thickness). For example, the 3(sigma) repeatability of measurements on a 207 nm linewidth is 0.75 nm and the 3 sigma repeatability for measurements on a 311 nm linewidth is 1.08 nm.

Proceedings Article | 22 September 1995 Paper

Subwavelength photoresist grating metrology using scatterometry

Michael Murnane, Christopher Raymond, S. Sohail Naqvi, John McNeil

Proceedings Volume 2532, (1995) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.221260

KEYWORDS: Scatterometry, Diffraction, Metrology, Diffraction gratings, Scanning electron microscopy, Photoresist materials, Semiconducting wafers, Calibration, Data modeling, Ellipsometry

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 18 September 1995 Paper

Multiparameter process metrology using scatterometry

Christopher Raymond, Michael Murnane, Steven Prins, S. Sohail, S. Sohail Naqvi, John McNeil

Proceedings Volume 2638, (1995) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.221213

KEYWORDS: Scatterometry, Semiconducting wafers, Scanning electron microscopy, Metrology, Scatter measurement, Diffraction, Ellipsometry, Photoresist processing, Oxides, Microelectronics

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 22 May 1995 Paper

Scatterometry for 0.24-0.70 um developed photoresist metrology

Michael Murnane, Christopher Raymond, Steven Prins, S. Sohail Naqvi, John McNeil

Proceedings Volume 2439, (1995) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.209227

KEYWORDS: Semiconducting wafers, Scatterometry, Scanning electron microscopy, Scatter measurement, Metrology, Photoresist materials, Calibration, Diffraction, Data modeling, Diffraction gratings

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 16 September 1994 Paper

Scatterometric sensor for lithography

Christopher Raymond, Michael Murnane, S. Sohail Naqvi, John McNeil

Proceedings Volume 2336, (1994) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.186798

KEYWORDS: Scanning electron microscopy, Semiconducting wafers, Scatterometry, Photoresist materials, Metrology, Calibration, Data modeling, Diffraction, Atomic force microscopy, Scatter measurement

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 1 May 1994 Paper

Developed photoresist metrology using scatterometry

Michael Murnane, Christopher Raymond, Ziad Hatab, S. Sohail Naqvi, John McNeil

Proceedings Volume 2196, (1994) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.174160

KEYWORDS: Scatterometry, Metrology, Semiconducting wafers, Photoresist materials, Scanning electron microscopy, Domes, Diffraction, Matrices, Chemically amplified resists, Helium neon lasers

Read Abstract +

Showing 5 of 28 publications

Proceedings Volume Editor (4)

SPIE Conference Volume | 28 March 2011

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXV

SPIE Conference Volume | 15 March 2010

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXIV

SPIE Conference Volume | 14 April 2009

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXIII

SPIE Conference Volume | 28 April 2008

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXII

Conference Committee Involvement (23)

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control XXXIX

23 February 2025 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control XXXVIII

26 February 2024 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control XXXVII

27 February 2023 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control XXXVI

25 April 2022 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Semiconductor Manufacturing XXXV

22 February 2021 | Online Only, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIV

24 February 2020 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIII

25 February 2019 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXII

26 February 2018 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXI

27 February 2017 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXX

22 February 2016 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXIX

23 February 2015 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXVIII

24 February 2014 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXVII

25 February 2013 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXVI

13 February 2012 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXV

28 February 2011 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXIV

22 February 2010 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXIII

23 February 2009 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXII

25 February 2008 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXI

26 February 2007 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XX

20 February 2006 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XIX

28 February 2005 | San Jose, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XVIII

23 February 2004 | Santa Clara, California, United States

Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XVII

24 February 2003 | Santa Clara, California, United States

Showing 5 of 23 Conference Committees

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years