Open Access
3 May 2017 Field-programmable gate array-controlled sweep velocity-locked laser pulse generator
Zhen Chen, Gerald Hefferman, Tao Wei
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
A field-programmable gate array (FPGA)-controlled sweep velocity-locked laser pulse generator (SV-LLPG) design based on an all-digital phase-locked loop (ADPLL) is proposed. A distributed feedback laser with modulated injection current was used as a swept-frequency laser source. An open-loop predistortion modulation waveform was calibrated using a feedback iteration method to initially improve frequency sweep linearity. An ADPLL control system was then implemented using an FPGA to lock the output of a Mach–Zehnder interferometer that was directly proportional to laser sweep velocity to an on-board system clock. Using this system, linearly chirped laser pulses with a sweep bandwidth of 111.16 GHz were demonstrated. Further testing evaluating the sensing utility of the system was conducted. In this test, the SV-LLPG served as the swept laser source of an optical frequency-domain reflectometry system used to interrogate a subterahertz range fiber structure (sub-THz-FS) array. A static strain test was then conducted and linear sensor results were observed.

1.

Introduction

Frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) reflectometry or optical frequency-domain reflectometry (OFDR)13 is a well-established frequency-domain measurement method for optical component characterization and optical fiber distributed sensing. This technique allows distance domain information to be obtained from frequency-domain intensity data via a Fourier transform. A key component of this FMCW reflectometry system is a swept-frequency laser source. A variety of laser sources have been investigated for this purpose, including temperature and piezo-electrically tuned Nd:YAG ring lasers,4,5 external cavity lasers (ECLs),613 piezo-electrically tuned fiber grating lasers,14 and chirped distributed feedback (DFB) lasers.15

Among these sources, the chirped DFB laser represents a particularly promising candidate for narrow-bandwidth interrogation applications. The output frequency of DFB lasers can be controlled using injection current modulation without the need for any moving mechanical components, resulting in a fast repetition rate over a sweeping bandwidth of 100  GHz. Other beneficial features of chirped DFB lasers include single longitudinal mode output, good laser coherence length (km), and low cost. However, there are several drawbacks limiting chirped DFB lasers as elements of FMCW/OFDR systems. Chief among these is a nonlinear relationship between input current and output frequency, leading to nonlinear optical sweep speeds. To compensate this nonlinearity, a predistortion waveform can be generated based on a feedback iteration method.16 However, this method only fractionally enhances the linearity of the resulting optical sweep speed. An auxiliary clock or “k-clock” with a fixed optical delay can also be applied to resample the data and correct for nonlinear sweep speeds.16 However, this sampling clock method increases both system sampling and signal processing complexity.

A closed-loop control system based on an optical phase-locked loop (OPLL) that modifies laser output frequency in real time offers an alternative approach for precisely controlling optical sweep speed.17,18 Recently, a digital-controlled chirped pulse laser based on a digital phase-locked loop (DPLL) design was reported based on modular electronic design.19 A digital phase comparator (XOR gate) was utilized to extract phase errors between the output of a Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI), which converted laser sweep speed to a radio-frequency (RF) signal,20,21 and a reference oscillator. The system generated a highly linear frequency sweep, and its utility as a source for high spatial resolution fiber sensing applications was demonstrated. However, while this system successfully demonstrated the concept, there remain engineering challenges, stemming from the fact that analog systems are susceptible to noise and DC drifts in comparison to similar digital systems.22,23 More importantly, modular design results in relatively high-power consumption, large size, and weight of the final product.

This paper reports an alternative design for a sweep velocity-locked laser pulse generator (SV-LLPG) using an all-digital phase-lock loop (ADPLL), which has the potential to surmount several of the previous engineering challenges facing modular DPLL design. The ADPLL is constructed such that all components, including the phase comparator, loop controller, and reference frequency synthesizer, are digitally generated using logic gates and integrated in an IC chip. This design was then implemented using a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) in which all-digital components were synchronized using the same on-chip clock to minimize phase noise. The FPGA chip used in this design is from Xilinx Zyqn 7000 series, and the digital-to-analog converter (DAC) is a Texas Instruments DAC121S101 with 12-bit resolution and a sampling rate of 1 MSa/s. Using this approach, a sweeping bandwidth of 111.16 GHz over 9 ms has been demonstrated. A highly consistent sweep velocity of 12.35  GHz/ms is maintained within each chirped pulse. The standard deviation of the starting frequency was measured to be 106.7 MHz, corresponding to a strain sensing instability of 0.79  μϵ. To evaluate the potential of the ADPLL-based SV-LLPG as an element of an OFDR system, the system was used to interrogate a subterahertz range fiber structure (sub-THz-FS) array. Highly linear results and a sensitivity of 0.1346  GHz/μϵ were observed, which agrees well with previously reported sensing results obtained using an ECL.6,7

2.

Operational Mechanism

A schematic of the described interrogation system is shown in Fig. 1. In the SV-LLPG module, a DFB laser is employed as the frequency sweep source, which is injection current modulated using a time-varying voltage via a laser control circuit. An isolator is placed at the laser output to eliminate reflection. Using a 90/10 coupler, 10% of the output power is directed into the MZI and 90% of the power into the sensing module to interrogate the sub-THz-FS array. The MZI is constructed with two 3-dB couplers with a constant delay, τd, of 11.334 ns. Under the assumption that the DFB laser is operated at a constant sweep velocity, the AC-coupled current output i(t) at the photodiode after the MZI as a function of time can be expressed as

Eq. (1)

i(t)=A(t)28ηcos[2π(f0+νt)τd],
where A(t) is the electrical-field amplitude directed into the MZI as a function of time, η is the responsivity of the photodiode, f0 is the initial frequency of the DFB laser during sweeping, ν is the optical sweep velocity, and t is the time. A beat frequency in the RF range less than 250 kHz, which is linearly proportional to laser sweep velocity, is generated through this fixed delay MZI. Due to the current injection modulation, the intensity of the DFB laser output varies as a function of time. To account for this effect, an automatic gain control (AGC) transimpedance amplifier is used to adjust the amplitude of AC-coupled photodiode output signal. This photodiode has a bandwidth of 1 MHz. A high-speed voltage comparator with a bandwidth of 50 MHz is used to convert the analog beat signals into digital signals, which is sent into a digital input port of an FPGA evaluation board with a 100-MHz system clock. To improve the initial laser sweep linearity before phase locking, a predistortion voltage waveform is precalibrated using a feedback iteration method,16 resulting in an output frequency sweep velocity at about 12.5  GHz/ms. This open-loop predistortion voltage waveform is then stored within the FPGA memory. A type-II phase comparator, constructed with two D flip-flops and an AND gate,24 is used to extract the phase difference between the input digital signal and the on-board reference frequency clock fR at 140 kHz. The resulting phase error signals are then fed into a loop controller constructed using an integrator to further modify the predistortion current modulation waveform. The digital output of the FGPA is converted to an analog signal using a DAC module with a refresh cycle of 1  μs and sent to the laser driver circuit.

Fig. 1

Schematic of proposed all-digital OPLL system with sensing modulate and control module (MZI, Mach–Zehnder interferometer; FPGA, field-programmable gate array; DAC, digital-to-analog converter; ADD, adder; PRE, predistortion curve; LC, loop controller; REF, reference frequency clock; PD, type-II phase detector; ADC, analog-to-digital converter; and DSP, digital signal processing unit).

OE_56_5_054102_f001.png

Spectrograms of the AGC output during a chirped laser pulse under the free-running open-loop case (when the phase errors are not fed into the loop controller) with an unmodified ramp input and under the precalibrated modulation waveform case are shown in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b). Sweep linearity is substantially improved using the predistortion curve compared with the initial ramp waveform. After closing the control loop (i.e., when the phase errors are fed into the loop controller), the laser sweep velocity is locked during each chirped laser pulse. When locked, the AGC output signal is in phase with the digital reference clock and the locked optical frequency sweep velocity ν can be expressed as

Eq. (2)

ν=fRτd.

Fig. 2

Measured frequency spectrum of AGC output within a chirped laser pulse: (a) free running with ramp input, (b) free running with calibrated predistortion input, and (c) sweep velocity locked.

OE_56_5_054102_f002.png

Given the fixed MZI delay length τd and the digital reference clock frequency fR, the locked sweep velocity is calculated to be 12.35  GHz/ms. Figure 2(c) shows the AGC output within a chirped pulsed under the locked condition. The total locking period within the chirped pulse is 9  ms, leading to an optical sweeping bandwidth of 111.16 GHz. Figure 3(a) shows the Fourier transform of the AGC output over the span of 9 ms under the locked condition; over that span, a signal-to-noise ratio above 35 dB was achieved. During testing, a resting period of 10 ms followed each 10-ms sweep in order discharge the capacitor within the laser driver circuit, resulting in a total period of 20 ms for each complete pulse cycle and a reputation rate of 50 Hz. The output of the chirped laser pulse generator for five complete cycles at the photodetector is plotted in Fig. 3(b). To determine the noise of the system, 1 s of data with 50 chirped laser pulses was recorded. The Fourier transform of this data is plotted in Fig. 3(c). A center frequency of 139.667 kHz was found. A 50-Hz frequency period was observed due to the repetition rate described above. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the peak envelope using a Gaussian curve fit was measured to be 90 Hz.

Fig. 3

(a) Fourier transform of the AGC output over the locked span of 9 ms, (b) output of the laser pulse generator with five complete cycles, (c) and a Gaussian curve fit applied to measure the FWHM of the Fourier transform of a chirped pulse train over 1 s.

OE_56_5_054102_f003.png

Along the sensing module, a homodyne interferometry structure is constructed using two 2×2 3-dB couplers as shown in Fig. 1. The input light is split into two paths via the first coupler, with one serving as the reference arm and the other path directed into the sensing arm, which includes a sub-THz-FS array. The sensing arm is terminated using an antireflection cut. The reflected light from the sub-THz-FS is then combined with light from the reference arm via the second coupler. A photodetector and a single channel AC-coupled 8-bit analog-to-digital converter (ADC) are used to record the resulting data. The sampling rate of the ADC is set to 8  MSa/s with a match antialiasing filter. The digitized raw data are then fed into a digital signal processing module.

3.

Experimental Results

To investigate the sensing capability of the described SV-LLPG system, a 20-pt periodic weak reflection sub-THz-FS array with a 1-mm pitch length was fabricated along a single-mode fiber (SMF-28, Corning, Inc.) using a Ti:sapphire femtosecond laser micromachining system (Coherent, Inc.).6,7,25,26 During interrogation and signal processing, this sub-THz-FS array was considered to be nine cascaded sub-THz-grating sensor units using a 4-mm-wide moving Butterworth bandpass filter with a step size of 2 mm. Each sensor unit contains four reflection peaks. This signal processing method has been systematically investigated in the previous publications.7,27 A self-mixing method and a low pass filter are applied to extract the resulting interferograms. Changes in strain along the optical fiber result in optical path length changes among the weak reflectors, which generate a phase shift in the interferograms that are used to measure strain changes along the sensor probe.

To evaluate the strain sensing capability of the system, a series of static strain tests were conducted. One end of the fiber under test (FUT) was secured to an optical bench while the other end was left free to hang. Weights were sequentially added to the free end of the fiber at 1.33-g intervals; in total, 10.64 g of weights were added to the free end of the FUT, resulting in a strain change of 125.23  μϵ. The SV-LLPG system was set using the parameters described above, resulting in a total sweeping bandwidth of 111.16 GHz. The resulting distance domain signals, calculated using a Fourier transform and in which the sensor structures can be identified between 2047 and 2067 mm, are plotted in Fig. 4(a). Due to the limited interrogation bandwidth, the individual reflection peaks of the sub-THz-FS array elements cannot be resolved. The measured frequency-domain interferograms of the seventh sensor unit between 2059 and 2063 mm are plotted in Fig. 4(b). The strain test results for all nine sensor units are plotted in Fig. 4(c), and the results of the seventh sensor unit specifically are plotted in Fig. 4(d). Linear results were observed for all sensor units, with the least linear having a R2 value of 0.9986. The mean strain sensitivity across all sensing elements was calculated to be 0.1346  GHz/μϵ with a standard deviation of 0.0026  μϵ. The start sweep frequency was evaluated by measuring the starting frequency of the entire system over 1000 captures, and the standard deviation of start frequency was 106.7 MHz.

Fig. 4

Static strain test: (a) time domain reflections of DUT, (b) interferograms of the sensor unit between 1779 and 1783 mm with varied strain applied, (c) strain test results for all nine sensor units, and (d) strain test results for the seventh sensor unit.

OE_56_5_054102_f004.png

4.

Conclusions

This paper reports an FPGA-controlled SV-LLPG design. A DFB laser is employed as the sweep source and an ADPLL control system is used to lock the laser sweep velocity to an on-board reference clock. Highly linear chirped laser pulses with a bandwidth of 111.16 GHz were demonstrated. A sweep velocity of 12.35  GHz/ms was achieved for 9 ms within each chirped pulse at a 50-Hz pulse repetition rate. To investigate system sensing utility, the SV-LLPG prototype was used as an element of an OFDR system to interrogate a sub-THz-FS array. A static strain test was conducted and highly linear results were observed.

The proposed device holds the promise to deliver a low size, weight, and power and affordable interrogator for distributed fiber sensing applications. In addition, the FPGA-based design makes it easier to be integrated and adopted for various applications in the future.

Acknowledgments

This research work was supported by the National Science Foundation through Grants Nos. CCF-1439011, CMMI-1462656, and EAR-1442623.

References

1. 

W. Eickhoff and R. Ulrich, “Optical frequency domain reflectometry in single-mode fiber,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 39 (9), 693 –695 (1981). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.92872 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

2. 

M. Froggatt and J. Moore, “High-spatial-resolution distributed strain measurement in optical fiber with Rayleigh scatter,” Appl. Opt., 37 (10), 1735 –1740 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.37.001735 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

3. 

X. Bao and L. Chen, “Recent progress in distributed fiber optic sensors,” Sensors, 12 (7), 8601 –8639 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120708601 SNSRES 0746-9462 Google Scholar

4. 

S. Venkatesh et al., “Coherent FMCW reflectometry using a piezoelectrically tuned Nd:YAG ring laser,” in Collected Papers of the Int. Conf. on Optical Fiber Sensors 1983–1997, (1992). Google Scholar

5. 

W. V. Sorin et al., “Coherent FMCW reflectometry using a temperature tuned Nd:YAG ring laser,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 2 (12), 902 –904 (1990). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/68.62024 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

6. 

Z. Chen et al., “Ultraweak intrinsic Fabry–Perot cavity array for distributed sensing,” Opt. Lett., 40 (3), 320 –323 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.40.000320 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

7. 

Z. Chen et al., “Terahertz fiber Bragg grating for distributed sensing,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 27 (10), 1084 –1087 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2015.2407580 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

8. 

Z. Chen, G. Hefferman and T. Wei, “Multiplexed displacement fiber sensor using thin core fiber exciter,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 86 (6), 065004 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4922019 RSINAK 0034-6748 Google Scholar

9. 

Z. Chen et al., “FiberID: molecular-level secret for identification of things,” in IEEE Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS’14), (2014). Google Scholar

10. 

B. Tang et al., “A hierarchical distributed fog computing architecture for big data analysis in smart cities,” in Proc. of the ASE BigData & Social Informatics 2015, 1 –6 (2015). Google Scholar

11. 

J. Kane et al., “Reflex-tree: a biologically inspired parallel architecture for future smart cities,” in 44th Int. Conf. on Parallel Processing, 360 –369 (2015). Google Scholar

12. 

Z. Chen, G. Hefferman and T. Wei, “Multiplexed oil level meter using a thin core fiber cladding mode exciter,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 27 (21), 2215 –2218 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2015.2457295 Google Scholar

13. 

Z. Chen et al., “Terahertz-range interrogated grating-based two-axis optical fiber inclinometer,” Opt. Eng., 55 (2), 026106 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.55.2.026106 Google Scholar

14. 

P. Oberson et al., “Optical frequency domain reflectometry with a narrow linewidth fiber laser,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 12 (7), 867 –869 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/68.853529 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

15. 

R. Passy et al., “Experimental and theoretical investigations of coherent OFDR with semiconductor laser sources,” J. Lightwave Technol., 12 (9), 1622 –1630 (1994). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/50.320946 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

16. 

Z. Chen, G. Hefferman and T. Wei, “A low bandwidth DFB laser-based interrogator for terahertz-range fiber Bragg grating sensors,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 29 (4), 365 –368 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2016.2647438 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

17. 

N. Satyan et al., “Precise control of broadband frequency chirps using optoelectronic feedback,” Opt. Express, 17 (18), 15991 –15999 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.015991 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

18. 

P. A. Roos et al., “Ultrabroadband optical chirp linearization for precision metrology applications,” Opt. Lett., 34 (23), 3692 –3694 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.34.003692 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

19. 

Z. Chen, G. Hefferman and T. Wei, “Digitally controlled chirped pulse laser for sub-terahertz-range fiber structure interrogation,” Opt. Lett., 42 (5), 1007 –1010 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.42.001007 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

20. 

G. Hefferman, Z. Chen and T. Wei, “Two-slot coiled coaxial cable resonator: Reaching critical coupling at a reduced number of coils,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 85 (11), 115106 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4901593 Google Scholar

21. 

Z. Chen et al., “microwave-modulated photon doppler velocimetry,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 28 (3), 327 –330 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2015.2495332 Google Scholar

22. 

A. Babu et al., “All digital phase locked loop design and implementation,” 32608 Gainesville, Florida (2009). Google Scholar

23. 

V. Kratyuk et al., “A design procedure for all-digital phase-locked loops based on a charge-pump phase-locked-loop analogy,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Express Briefs, 54 (3), 247 –251 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2006.889443 Google Scholar

24. 

W. Min et al., “A novel configurable no dead-zone digital phase detector design,” in IEEE Asia Pacific Conf. on Circuits and Systems (APCCAS 2008), 721 –724 (2008). Google Scholar

25. 

G. Hefferman et al., “Phase-shifted terahertz fiber Bragg grating for strain sensing with large dynamic range,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 27 (15), 1649 –1652 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2015.2433682 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

26. 

Z. Chen et al., “Ultraweak waveguide modification with intact buffer coating using femtosecond laser pulses,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 27 (16), 1705 –1708 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2015.2438078 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

27. 

Z. Chen, G. Hefferman and T. Wei, “Terahertz-range weak reflection fiber optic structures for sensing applications,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 23 (2), 1 –6 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2612221 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

Biography

Zhen Chen received his BS degree in optics and optical science from Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China, in 2012 and his MS degree in electrical engineering from Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China, in 2013. He is currently a PhD candidate in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island. His research interests include instrumentation, fiber sensors, and laser wavelength modulation and control.

Gerald Hefferman received his BID degree from Pratt Institute, Brooklyn, New York, in 2009 and his diploma in premedical studies from the Harvard Extension School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 2013. He is currently pursuing an MD degree at the Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. Since 2013, he has been a research assistant at the University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island. His research interests include the application of photonics to clinical medicine.

Tao Wei received his BS degree in mechanical engineering from Nanjing Technology University, Nanjing, China, in 2006 and his MS and PhD degrees in electrical engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, Missouri, USA, in 2008 and 2011, respectively. He is currently an assistant professor of electrical engineering at the University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA. His research interests include photonic and microwave devices for various sensing applications.

© 2017 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) 0091-3286/2017/$25.00 © 2017 SPIE
Zhen Chen, Gerald Hefferman, and Tao Wei "Field-programmable gate array-controlled sweep velocity-locked laser pulse generator," Optical Engineering 56(5), 054102 (3 May 2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.56.5.054102
Received: 10 February 2017; Accepted: 17 April 2017; Published: 3 May 2017
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 4 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Pulsed laser operation

Sensors

Clocks

Pulse generators

Field programmable gate arrays

Modulation

Sensing systems


CHORUS Article. This article was made freely available starting 03 May 2018

Back to Top