Significance: A major obstacle to studying resident microglia has been their similarity to infiltrating immune cell types and the lack of unique protein markers for identifying the functional state. Given the role of microglia in all neural diseases and insults, accurate tools for detecting their function beyond morphologic alterations are necessary. Aims: We hypothesized that microglia would have unique metabolic fluxes in reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) that would be detectable by relative changes in fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) parameters, allowing for identification of their activation status. Fluorescence lifetime of NADH has been previously demonstrated to show differences in metabolic fluxes. Approach: Here, we investigate the use of the label-free method of FLIM-based detection of the endogenous metabolic cofactor NADH to identify microglia and characterize their activation status. To test whether microglial activation would also confer a unique NADH lifetime signature, murine primary microglial cultures and adult mice were treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Results: We found that LPS-induced microglia activation correlates with detected changes in NADH lifetime and its free-bound ratio. This indicates that NADH lifetime can be used to monitor microglia activation in a label-free fashion. Moreover, we found that there is an LPS dose-dependent change associated with reactive microglia lifetime fluxes, which is also replicated over time after LPS treatment. Conclusion: We have demonstrated a label-free way of monitoring microglia activation via quantifying lifetime of endogenous metabolic coenzyme NADH. Upon LPS-induced activation, there is a significant change in the fluorescence lifetime following activation. Together, these results indicate that NADH FLIM approaches can be used as a method to characterize microglia activation state, both in vitro and ex vivo. |
1.IntroductionMicroglia have prominent roles in both central nervous system (CNS) injury/disease responses and in protection of the CNS.1–4 Major obstacles in studying microglia have been the lack of specific protein markers that indicate their activation status in the absence of concomitant morphological changes and the difficulty in distinguishing them from related infiltrating myeloid cells. Microglial activation can be characterized in many different ways, but currently there is no single parameter that can uniquely characterize their activation,5 likely because the process of activation is gradual and involves many intermediate states on the spectrum between surveillance and activation.6 While proteins such as ionized calcium binding protein 1 (Iba1), the integrin receptor CD11b, the purinergic receptor P2Y12, and the fractalkine receptor CX3CR1 are uniquely expressed in microglia in the healthy CNS,7,8 they are also expressed in macrophages, preventing accurate distinction between resident microglia and infiltrating peripheral cells. The current primary method of observing microglial activation depends on antibody staining to assess morphology and marker expression. For example, immunoreactivity detects both activated microglia and macrophages. While the combination of and staining is widely used to distinguish microglia from macrophages, it cannot distinguish between activated microglia and macrophages. More recently, other proteins such as the orphan receptor TMEM1199 and the lysosomal hexosaminidase enzyme B (HexB)10 have been identified by transcriptomic analyses as unique to microglia, and are not expressed in macrophages,11–14 but these cannot distinguish activation states either. Thus, a method allowing for a clear distinction in microglial activation states would be indispensable for identifying initiators of and/or contributors to CNS dysfunction in different disease etiologies. To study microglial activity ex vivo, methods such as immunomagnetic separation can efficiently isolate microglia without altering their functional state.15 However, a method that does not require isolation from the rest of the CNS environment that can enable analysis of microglial activation status in intact tissue or whole brain would be more powerful. Recently, morphology-based image analysis techniques have been developed to characterize microglial activation based on the ratio of cell body to cell size,16 or morphological categorization based on hierarchical cluster and principal components analysis.17 Other studies have tried to characterize microglial activation using statistical changes in soma size and roundness.18 To address the limitations of current antibody-based microglial characterization techniques, we hypothesized that fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM)-based monitoring of microglial metabolic alterations could be used to both differentiate surveillant microglia from activated microglia, as well as distinguish them from other CNS cell-types. Fluorescence lifetime is the measure of the average time a molecule remains in its excited state before returning to its ground state; a photon is emitted upon the return to ground state. FLIM measures the lifetime of each individual photon and creates a pixel contrast map based on the calculated exponential decay of each pixel.19 Importantly, unlike other fluorescence-based methods, fluorescence lifetime does not depend on concentration, absorption, or excitation intensity.20–22 Multiple physiologic parameters can change fluorescence lifetime including the local pH, ion, and oxygen concentrations, making FLIM an ideal method with which to image the cellular microenvironment. FLIM monitors metabolism by taking advantage of the intrinsic fluorescence of the ubiquitous metabolic coenzyme nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD). The fluorescence lifetime of protein-bound NADH changes depending on the enzyme to which it is bound.23 Recent evidence suggests that immune cells can switch from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis during inflammatory activation; much like the Warburg effect observed in tumor cells.24–28 Given the known metabolic changes that take place during microglial activation29 and the ability of FLIM to image free- and enzyme-bound NADH, we hypothesized that NADH lifetime and the fractional contribution of free NADH could be used to first distinguish microglia from other glial cell types, and then identify microglial activation status in the absence of additional fluorophore tagging. Previous efforts have exploited FLIM to examine the metabolic state of the cellular microenvironment and develop label-free signatures for different cell types ranging from bacteria to stem cells.30,31 A strategy reported by our group used FLIM as a means to noninvasively identify mammary tumor-associated macrophages in live mouse models.32 Another study also exploited the metabolic shift in macrophages to identify their phenotype label-free in cell culture.33 Here, we show that FLIM-based approaches can be used to observe metabolic changes in microglial cells using NADH lifetime signatures. We demonstrate the capability of FLIM to differentiate between surveillant and activated states of microglia both in primary mixed glial cultures and in tissue slices from adult mice treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). First, we tested different doses of LPS to examine changes in microglial FLIM signatures, then we tested the effect of different treatment times of a single LPS dose. We found that FLIM can be readily used to discriminate the activation status of microglia in tissue by quantifying NADH lifetime. 2.Materials and Methods2.1.AnimalsAll animals were maintained in an AAALAC-accredited animal facility with a 12-h light/dark cycle regime and access to food and water ad libitum. All experiments were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and with the Guide to Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 2.2.In Vivo TreatmentsFor FLIM imaging, thick coronal slices were prepared from the fixed brains of 8-week-old, young adult C57BL/6J [wild type (WT)] mice (Jackson Labs, Bar Harbor, Maine). Mice were either given no treatment (control) or LPS (i.p. from E. coli O111:B4, Sigma) dissolved in sterile Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS), mice per treatment group. Three hours after LPS injection, animals were euthanized by isoflurane overdose and transcardially perfused with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), followed by a second perfusion with an ice-cold solution of 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS. Brains were dissected, postfixed for 24 h in a solution of 4% PFA in PBS, and then moved to HBSS (all performed at 4°C and protected from light). 2.3.Preparation of Primary Neonatal Mixed Glial CulturesMixed primary glial cultures were prepared from 3-7A day old, CX3CR1-green-fluorescent protein (GFP) mouse pups as previously described.34 Briefly, brains were dissected immediately after decapitation, and the brain stem, cerebellum, olfactory bulbs, meninges, and visible blood vessels were removed. The remaining tissue was finely minced, thoroughly triturated with a serological pipette in 0.25% trypsin–ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) containing deoxyribonuclease I and then incubated at 37°C for 20 min. The reaction was immediately stopped by the addition of an equal volume of heat-inactivated horse serum. Dissociated cells were resuspended in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and penicillin/streptomycin. Brains were processed individually for each pup, and the resulting cell suspension was divided equally and plated in 35 mm dishes (one brain per four to six dishes). The plated cells were cultured for 7 to 14 days in a 37°C incubator supplemented with 5% ; the culture medium was replaced every 3 to 4 days. 2.4.Cell Culture TreatmentsMixed CX3CR1-GFP glial cultures were treated with HBSS (vehicle), 1, 10, or of LPS for 3, 8, or 24 h as indicated in the figure legends ( independent biological replicates for each treatment). LPS is a ligand of the pattern recognition receptor TLR4 that mimics bacterial infection and activates inflammatory signaling pathways in microglia that lead to the production and release of inflammatory cytokines including and . Preliminary experiments demonstrated no significant difference in mean NADH lifetimes in HBSS-treated cells between 3 and 24 h (data not shown). Following treatment, the culture medium was aspirated, and the cells were washed with cold HBSS before fixing with 4% PFA for 5 min, after which time the cells were washed again with cold HBSS and stored at 4°C protected from light. 2.5.Immunohistochemistrythick coronal sections were prepared from the midbrain region of WT mouse brains ( for each treatment group) using a Leica vibratome. Two slices from each animal were used for immunohistochemical staining. Briefly, slices were washed at room temperature with 0.3% TritonX-100 in PBS, before incubating in blocking buffer (1% bovine serum albumin, 0.3% TritonX-100/PBS) for 2 h at room temperature. To identify microglia, tissue slices were incubated with anti-Iba1 antibodies (1:1000; Wako Catalog No. 019-19741) in blocking buffer in the dark at 4°C overnight. Slices were washed again at room temperature with 0.3% TritonX-100 in PBS followed by incubation in the dark for 2 h with AlexaFlour594 anti-rabbit IgG antibodies (1:200; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts) in blocking buffer at room temperature. Slices were washed with 0.3% TritonX-100 in PBS and mounted on 1-mm slides using Cytoseal 60 (Richard-Allan Scientific, Kalamazoo, Michigan) mounting medium. Mounted sections were stored at room temperature, protected from light until imaging. 2.6.Multiphoton Lifetime ImagingMultiphoton lifetime35 and intensity imaging were performed on a custom multiphoton laser scanning system built around an inverted Nikon Eclipse TE2000U at the UW-Madison Laboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation.36 A air objective (Nikon Plan Apo VC, 0.75 NA, Melville, New York, USA) was used for all imaging. For NADH imaging, data were collected using an excitation wavelength of 740 nm, and emission was filtered with a bandpass filter (Semrock, Rochester, New York), corresponding to the spectral peak for NADH/NADPH (PH–phosphate). For GFP intensity imaging, excitation was set at 890 nm and a bandpass emission filter was used (Semrock). For AlexaFluor594 imaging, excitation was set at 810 nm, and a 615/20 bandpass emission filter (Semrock) was used. For FAD imaging, excitation was set at 890 nm and a 520/35 bandpass emission filter was used (Semrock). FLIM images were collected at a resolution for 120 s using single photon counting (SPC)-150 Photon Counting Electronics (Becker & Hickl GbmH, Berlin, Germany) and a Hamamatsu H7422P-40 GaAsP photomultiplier tube (Hamamatsu Photonics, Bridgewater, New Jersey). The excitation power incident on cell/tissue was for FLIM imaging. From a single dish or tissue section for each n, neighboring field of views (FOVs) consisting of several hundred cells were randomly selected, and the mean signal was calculated based on the masking described in Sec. 2.6. The optical system instrument response function (IRF) was calibrated for each imaging session. Autofluorescence intensity and fluorescence lifetime data were analyzed in SPCImage (Becker & Hickl GmbH); a Levenberg–Marquardt routine for nonlinear fitting was used to fit the fluorescence decay curve collected for each decay after binning (factor 2). Data were assessed by the minimized chi-squared value generated during the fit so that the analysis was unbiased. To eliminate background fluorescence, a threshold was applied based on photon counts. A two-component fit was performed to account for free and bound NADH, and the mean lifetime was calculated with , where and represent the fractional contribution from free and bound NADH, and and are lifetime constants of the free and bound components, respectively. For measuring the instrument response function, we used a urea crystal sample with 740-nm excitation and a 370/10 narrow bandpass (Semrock) filter to get the second harmonic generation signal. The use of a multiphoton laser scanning microscope modality for FLIM offers several advantages over confocal microscopy including deeper sample penetration, improved signal-to-noise ratios, enhanced sample viability (although all samples in the present studies were fixed), and it is tunable to multiple excitation wavelengths such as to image NADH, FAD, GFP, and Alexa 594. Figure 1 shows the experimental setup and image analysis 2.7.Data AnalysisThe lifetime fitted data from SPCImage and all other parameters were exported into MATLAB® (MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts) for calculating the means of custom regions and performing statistical analyses. The mean lifetimes and free/bound ratios were calculated for each sample. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), paired sample -tests were performed to determine the statistical significance in tissue culture experiments. A student’s -test was performed for determining the significance in the tissue slice experiments from mice treated with LPS. Statistical significance was set at . As mentioned previously, both the ex vivo and in vitro experiments consisted of five biological replicates per treatment. Each was comprised of neighboring FOVs per dish or tissue section, which were subsequently used to calculate average FLIM parameters for each treatment group. 3.Results3.1.Microglial NADH Fluorescence Can Distinguish Reactive Microglia Following LPS TreatmentAccording to previous FLIM studies, a shorter mean lifetime and a higher fractional contribution implies greater free (and less bound) NADH.37,38 To study FLIM parameters in activated microglia, we investigated the relative change in NADH FLIM parameters in microglia stimulated with LPS.39–42 The underlying hypothesis of this experiment was that LPS treatment would initiate an inflammatory response resulting in a change in microglial metabolism, causing alterations in the metabolic cofactor NADH that could be assessed by FLIM. We treated mixed glial cultures with LPS () for 1 h. The mean NADH lifetime and fractional contribution of free NADH were compared between the vehicle- and LPS-treated groups. Representative images of microglial NADH lifetimes [Fig. 2(a) and 2(c)] and the fractional contributions of free NADH [Fig. 2(b) and 2(d)] from vehicle- and LPS-treated samples, respectively, show that LPS treatment significantly increased NADH lifetime (vehicle treatment and LPS treatment ) in microglia [Fig. 2(e)]. In contrast, the free NADH fractional contribution [Fig. 2(f)] was significantly decreased (vehicle treatment and LPS treatment ). These data suggest that 1 h of LPS treatment can induce a rapid change in NADH lifetime, indicating that FLIM may be useful to monitor the status of microglial activation prior to a visible change in morphology. To confirm that microglia could still be distinguished from other glia in the context of LPS treatment, the FLIM parameters of microglia and nonmicroglial cells were compared. The mean microglia lifetime was significantly lower () than nonmicroglia () [Fig. 2(g)], whereas the fractional free NADH contribution in microglia was significantly higher () than nonmicroglia () [Fig. 2(h)]. In addition, we compared the FLIM parameters of surveillant microglia with other cells in the mixed glial cultures. We looked at 10 different samples consisting of over a thousand cells from different FOVs for each sample (Fig. 3). The mean lifetime for microglial cells was (ps), and the mean lifetime for nonmicroglia cells was [Fig. 3(a)], whereas the fractional contribution from free NADH for microglia was and for nonmicroglia [Fig. 3(b)]. Together, these results indicate that microglia have a significantly lower mean NADH lifetime and a higher free NADH component compared to nonmicroglial cells. 3.2.FLIM Can Be Used to Characterize Microglia in Brain TissueAfter establishing that FLIM parameters can be used to characterize microglia in mixed glial cell cultures, and that FLIM can distinguish activated microglia, we next extended our observations to test whether this trend holds in intact brain tissue. Brain tissue was sectioned for ex vivo multiphoton FLIM imaging from WT mice that were either given no treatment or treated in vivo with LPS () for 3 h. The goals of this experiment were twofold: (1) to investigate whether microglia have a unique lifetime signature in relation to other brain cell types in tissue and (2) to determine if microglial activation causes alterations in FLIM NADH lifetime and free NADH level parameters in tissue. Microglia were labeled with anti-Iba1 antibodies, followed by an Alexa Fluor 594 secondary antibody. Representative NADH lifetime images of microglia from untreated [Fig. 4(a)] and LPS-treated [Fig. 4(b)] mice showed a statistically significant reduction in microglial NADH mean lifetime () compared to nonmicroglial cells () in the tissue [Fig. 4(c)]. As we had observed in mixed glial cultures, we found that microglia had a longer mean NADH lifetime () in tissue slices from LPS-treated mice compared to microglia from untreated mice () [Fig. 4(d)]. Furthermore, we found that LPS treatment increased lifetime from to in a GFP mice. In addition, we observed similar LPS-induced shifts in lifetime values in WT tissue slices stained with Iba1 (not shown) suggesting that GFP expression does not interfere with relative lifetime changes. 3.3.LPS Dose Dependently Alters NADH Lifetime and Free NADH RatioWe next sought to determine whether LPS treatment could dose dependently alter microglial NADH lifetime and free NADH levels. To test this, we treated mixed glial cultures with 1, 10, and LPS. We found that NADH lifetimes were indeed dose dependently increased by LPS treatment (Fig. 5). While the NADH lifetime of cells treated with vehicle () did not differ from LPS (), microglial lifetimes in () and () LPS were significantly increased over control treatment, as expected [Fig. 5(a)]. The fractional NADH contribution (a1) in contrast, dose dependently decreased with increasing LPS concentrations [Fig. 5(b)]. Again, whereas free NADH levels between vehicle () and LPS () did not differ, they were significantly decreased in the () and () LPS doses. 3.4.LPS Treatment Time Dependently Increases Microglial NADH LifetimeTo determine whether the observed differences in FLIM parameters changed with time post-LPS treatment, mixed glial cultures were treated with LPS for 3, 8, and 24 h. We chose the dose of LPS because it was the lowest dose tested that had statistically significant effects on FLIM parameters. Representative images of the mean microglial NADH lifetime [Fig. 6(a)] and the fractional contribution from free NADH [Fig. 6(b)] are shown. LPS significantly increased the NADH lifetime of microglia at 3 h (), 8 h (), and 24 h () compared to vehicle-treated cells () ps [Fig. 6(c)]. The fractional free NADH components significantly decreased from vehicle treatment () at both 8 h () and 24 h (), but not at 3 h () [Fig. 6(d)]. 4.DiscussionHere, we report a method of differentiating microglial activation in relation to surveillant microglia using FLIM measurements of the intrinsically fluorescent metabolic cofactor NADH. We show that NADH FLIM can be used to characterize the activation state of microglia both in vitro and ex vivo in brain tissue, and that LPS dose and treatment time directly impact FLIM parameters. In addition, we found that microglia have different FLIM parameter values in relation to other glial cells in mixed glial cultures and in brain tissue sections. Based on previous studies, a relative change in NADH lifetime reflects a change in metabolic state of the intracellular microenvironment such that a lower mean lifetime implies greater free NADH.37,38 We found that microglia in their surveillant or unactivated state had a shorter NADH mean lifetime compared to other glial cells, and that they had a greater fractional contribution from free NADH. In contrast, LPS treatment increased their mean NADH lifetime and decreased the fractional contribution of free NADH (compared to vehicle treatment). To our knowledge, this is the first study to characterize microglia and to study the glial response to an inflammatory stimulus using fluorescence lifetime imaging. In brain tissue slices, we found that microglia had a lower mean NADH lifetime than other cells in the tissue and that LPS treatment increased their mean lifetime for NADH, supporting our contention that NADH lifetime can be used as a signature to differentiate between surveillant and activated microglia in the brain. In the mixed glial culture, there was a decrease in the fractional contribution from NADH in tissue after 3 h of LPS treatment, although it did not quite reach statistical significance (). There was, however, a statistically significant increase in the NADH mean lifetime. But in tissue, differences in microglial NADH FLIM were observed within 1 h of LPS treatment even before visible morphological changes appeared. Based on these observations, we postulate that mean NADH lifetime is well-suited for identifying a microglial fingerprint upon activation. FAD being the principle electron donor in the electron transport chain is an important metabolic cofactor in the cellular respiratory process and together with NADH intensity can be used to determine the redox state of the cell.43–46 Based on the metabolic state, the FAD lifetime and relative free/bound state also change. Therefore, FAD lifetime may also be useful as an additional parameter to NADH lifetime. In tissue slices, we chose Alexa 594 as the fluorophore to identify microglia. This freed the FAD emission channel allowing us to test the efficacy of the FLIM technique with a microglial marker independent of GFP fluorescence. We found that FAD lifetime had similar changes to NADH lifetime both when compared to nonmicroglial cells and microglial activation status (Fig. S1 in the Supplementary Material). Because of the relative weakness of FAD intensity and overlap with other fluorophore spectra, FAD FLIM imaging can be challenging. In future work, FAD lifetime changes need to be quantified in both dose and time variation studies to see whether the trend holds like NADH. Future studies may also exploit both NADH and FAD lifetime changes simultaneously to provide better quantification of the microglial redox state and indicate their activation status. We would also like to draw attention to the trend of change in lifetime and free NADH ratio. According to the definition of mean lifetime described in Sec. 2, the mean lifetime is dependent on free NADH. Therefore, the changes have similar patterns. But they might not always necessarily result in the same conclusion. For example, in Sec. 3.4, the 3-h time point showed a significant change in lifetime, but not the free NADH ratio. In cases where free and bound lifetime had significant alterations, the trend might not be as similar, so probing both parameters in the future might be helpful to better understand the changes. Our observation that NADH lifetime increases upon LPS treatment suggests that microglia become more oxidative upon inflammatory activation. Although there is evidence that reparative macrophages tend to be more oxidative rather than glycolytic,33,47–49 the metabolic status of LPS-stimulated microglia needs to be verified in a separate experiment. It is important to note that the lifetime changes observed here following LPS activation may not necessarily be the same as microglial inflammatory activation by other stimuli, such as aging, neurodegenerative disease, or sleep deprivation/fragmentation disorders. Additional studies are needed to quantify FLIM parameters in the context of these scenarios since FLIM may be extended to study the behavior of microglia in aging,34 multiple sclerosis, and neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. One caveat to note in these studies is that FLIM parameters may be altered in mixed glial cell cultures due to the extraction and culture process. However, since we noted similar changes in brain tissue after in vivo LPS treatment, it is unlikely that the altered FLIM signals we have noted are an artifact of the in vitro culture system. There may also be concern about lifetime shifts due simply to the fixation process. In this regard, our lab recently demonstrated that fixation does not change the metabolic contrast.50 Although the absolute lifetime values may be shifted by fixation, the treatment-induced alterations should be relative. In addition, the accuracy of the fit will depend on the signal-to-noise ratio. Thus, it is likely that a sample with a low signal-to-noise ratio, the fit and overall result might be inaccurate. Finally, it is important to note that recent work51 showed possible overlap between GFP and NADH spectra, which may confound interpretation of FLIM results. While this will require further investigation, when we compared lifetime pattern shifts in WT and CX3CR1-GFP brain tissue slices, we found that NADH lifetime was still increased upon LPS treatment, regardless of the presence of GFP (data not shown). Likewise, we saw similar FLIM signature and activation trends in brain tissue using A594, which is well separated from the NADH spectra. The increase in NADH lifetime as a result of LPS-induced activation would suggest a more oxidative nature of active microglia compared to surveillant; however, further experiments would need to be done to confirm their metabolic state and the resulting shift in lifetime. Finally, although there may be variability among FLIM systems based on the optics and electronics used, the trends and relative changes in lifetime should be comparable. FLIM can also be used to measure the variability within a specific system. In the future, NADH and FAD FLIM parameters may be used to determine whether microglia and infiltrating macrophages can be distinguished using cell-specific markers and advanced computational techniques (such as machine learning). Another important direction for future studies would be to utilize FLIM to differentiate microglial phenotypes52 to better understand their transition between different immune activities and test the effectiveness of therapeutic drugs.53 A major limitation for using FLIM assessments in tissues or in vivo is the complexity of distinguishing microglial signatures in the context of multiple cell populations and tissue environments. While work is ongoing to improve the speed and accuracy of FLIM for complex multicomponent measurements, FLIM by itself may be insufficient in some cases. Accordingly, we are exploring machine learning-based approaches to exploit the NADH/FAD lifetime differences in microglia compared to the surrounding tissue in metabolically active situations, such as in vivo. 5.ConclusionUsing a multiphoton FLIM-based technique, we have characterized microglia and their activation status. Our results demonstrate that LPS-activated microglia have a higher NADH lifetime than surveillant microglia. We found that the change in NADH FLIM parameters of activated microglia was both LPS dose and treatment time dependent, which may be indicative of their activation state. In the future, the relative increase in NADH lifetime may be used to characterize cell activation in various neurodegenerative disorders in the CNS. We conclude that FLIM can be a powerful tool with which to monitor changes in microglial activation states or metabolic changes, perhaps in the absence of additional immunostaining. AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Peter Crump (CALS computer Lab, UW-Madison) for consulting on the statistical analysis. Funding: We acknowledge funding from the Semiconductor Research Corporation (KWE) and the Morgridge Institute for Research (KWE). This work was also supported by Grants No. NIH R01 HL111598 and No. NS085226 (JJW). Nonanimal work was sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) MTO under the auspices of Dr. Tristan McClure-Begley through the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, Pacific Grant/Contract No. N66001-17-2-4010 (JCW). Data availability statement: The data for this study was available upon reasonable request. ReferencesN. A. Charles et al.,
“The brain tumor microenvironment,”
Glia, 59
(8), 1169
–1180
(2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.21136 GLIAEJ 1098-1136 Google Scholar
G. A. Garden and T. Möller,
“Microglia biology in health and disease,”
J. NeuroImmune Pharm., 1
(2), 127
–137
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11481-006-9015-5 Google Scholar
B. R. Tambuyzer, P. Ponsaerts and E. J. Nouwen,
“Microglia: gatekeepers of central nervous system immunology,”
J. Leukocyte Biol., 85
(3), 352
–370
(2009). https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0608385 JLBIE7 0741-5400 Google Scholar
J. J. Watters, J. M. Schartner and B. Badie,
“Microglia function in brain tumors,”
J. Neurosci. Res., 81
(3), 447
–455
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.20485 JNREDK 0360-4012 Google Scholar
C. Béchade, Y. Cantaut-Belarif and A. Bessis,
“Microglial control of neuronal activity,”
Front. Cell Neurosci., 7 32
(2013). https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2013.00032 Google Scholar
G. Raivich et al.,
“Neuroglial activation repertoire in the injured brain: graded response, molecular mechanisms and cues to physiological function,”
Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev., 30
(1), 77
–105
(1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(99)00007-7 Google Scholar
A. Mildner et al.,
“P2Y12 receptor is expressed on human microglia under physiological conditions throughout development and is sensitive to neuroinflammatory diseases,”
Glia, 65
(2), 375
–387
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23097 GLIAEJ 1098-1136 Google Scholar
S. Yona et al.,
“Fate mapping reveals origins and dynamics of monocytes and tissue macrophages under homeostasis,”
Immunity, 38
(1), 79
–91
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2012.12.001 IUNIEH 1074-7613 Google Scholar
J. Satoh et al.,
“TMEM119 marks a subset of microglia in the human brain,”
Neuropathology, 36
(1), 39
–49
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/neup.12235 NANEDL 1365-2990 Google Scholar
M. L. Dubbelaar et al.,
“The kaleidoscope of microglial phenotypes,”
Front. Immunol., 9
(2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01753 Google Scholar
O. Butovsky et al.,
“Identification of a unique TGF-β–dependent molecular and functional signature in microglia,”
Nat. Neuroscie., 17
(1), 131
–143
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3599 Google Scholar
I. M. Chiu et al.,
“A neurodegeneration-specific gene-expression signature of acutely isolated microglia from an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mouse model,”
Cell Rep., 4
(2), 385
–401
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.06.018 Google Scholar
E. L. Gautier et al.,
“Gene-expression profiles and transcriptional regulatory pathways that underlie the identity and diversity of mouse tissue macrophages,”
Nat. Immunol., 13
(11), 1118
–1128
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2419 NRIABX 1474-1733 Google Scholar
D. Gosselin et al.,
“Environment drives selection and function of enhancers controlling tissue-specific macrophage identities,”
Cell, 159
(6), 1327
–1340
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.023 CELLB5 0092-8674 Google Scholar
M. Nikodemova and J. J. Watters,
“Efficient isolation of live microglia with preserved phenotypes from adult mouse brain,”
J. Neuroinflamm., 9
(1), 147
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-9-147 Google Scholar
I. B. Hovens, C. Nyakas and R. G. Schoemaker,
“A novel method for evaluating microglial activation using ionized calcium-binding adaptor protein-1 staining: cell body to cell size ratio,”
Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm., 1 82
–88
(2014). https://doi.org/10.4103/2347-8659.139719 Google Scholar
M. M. Fernández-Arjona et al.,
“Microglia morphological categorization in a rat model of neuroinflammation by hierarchical cluster and principal components analysis,”
Front. Cell. Neurosci., 11 235
(2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00235 Google Scholar
B. M. Davis et al.,
“Characterizing microglia activation: a spatial statistics approach to maximize information extraction,”
Sci. Rep., 7
(1), 1576
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01747-8 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar
W. Becker,
“Fluorescence lifetime imaging: techniques and applications,”
J. Microsc., 247
(2), 119
–136
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2012.03618.x JMICAR 0022-2720 Google Scholar
Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Springer US, Boston, Massachusetts
(2006). Google Scholar
M. Y. Berezin and S. Achilefu,
“Fluorescence lifetime measurements and biological imaging,”
Chem. Rev., 110
(5), 2641
–2684
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900343z CHREAY 0009-2665 Google Scholar
K. Suhling et al.,
“Fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM): basic concepts and some recent developments,”
Med. Photonics, 27 3
–40
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medpho.2014.12.001 Google Scholar
I. Iweibo,
“Protein fluorescence and electronic energy transfer in the determination of molecular dimensions and rotational relaxation times of native and coenzyme-bound horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase,”
Biochim. Biophys. Acta – Prot. Struct., 446
(1), 192
–205
(1976). https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2795(76)90110-0 Google Scholar
O. Warburg,
“On the origin of cancer cells,”
Science, 123
(3191), 309
–314
(1956). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.123.3191.309 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar
M. G. V. Heiden, L. C. Cantley and C. B. Thompson,
“Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation,”
Science, 324
(5930), 1029
–1033
(2009). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160809 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar
L. A. Voloboueva et al.,
“Inflammatory response of microglial BV-2 cells includes a glycolytic shift and is modulated by mitochondrial glucose-regulated protein 75/mortalin,”
FEBS Lett., 587
(6), 756
–762
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2013.01.067 FEBLAL 0014-5793 Google Scholar
J. Gimeno-Bayón et al.,
“Glucose pathways adaptation supports acquisition of activated microglia phenotype,”
J. Neurosci. Res., 92
(6), 723
–731
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23356 JNREDK 0360-4012 Google Scholar
B. Kelly and L. A. O’Neill,
“Metabolic reprogramming in macrophages and dendritic cells in innate immunity,”
Cell Res., 25
(7), 771
–784
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2015.68 1001-0602 Google Scholar
S. Nair et al.,
“Lipopolysaccharide-induced alteration of mitochondrial morphology induces a metabolic shift in microglia modulating the inflammatory response in vitro and in vivo,”
Glia, 67
(6), 1047
–1061
(2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23587 GLIAEJ 1098-1136 Google Scholar
C. Stringari et al.,
“Phasor fluorescence lifetime microscopy of free and protein-bound NADH reveals neural stem cell differentiation potential,”
PLoS One, 7
(11), e48014
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048014 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar
A. Bhattacharjee et al.,
“Metabolic fingerprinting of bacteria by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy,”
Sci. Rep., 7
(1), 3743
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04032-w SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar
J. M. Szulczewski et al.,
“In vivo visualization of stromal macrophages via label-free FLIM-based metabolite imaging,”
Sci. Rep., 6 srep25086
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25086 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar
A. Alfonso-García et al.,
“Label-free identification of macrophage phenotype by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 21
(4), 046005
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.4.046005 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
J. M. Crain, M. Nikodemova and J. J. Watters,
“Microglia express distinct M1 and M2 phenotypic markers in the postnatal and adult central nervous system in male and female mice,”
J. Neurosci. Res., 91
(9), 1143
–1151
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23242 JNREDK 0360-4012 Google Scholar
W. Denk, J. H. Strickler and W. W. Webb,
“Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy,”
Science, 248
(4951), 73
–76
(1990). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2321027 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar
L. Yan et al.,
“Applications of combined spectral lifetime microscopy for biology,”
Biotechniques, 41
(3), 249
(2006). https://doi.org/10.2144/000112251 BTNQDO 0736-6205 Google Scholar
D. K. Bird et al.,
“Metabolic mapping of MCF10A human breast cells via multiphoton fluorescence lifetime imaging of the coenzyme NADH,”
Cancer Res., 65
(19), 8766
–8773
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3922 CNREA8 0008-5472 Google Scholar
M. C. Skala et al.,
“Multiphoton microscopy of endogenous fluorescence differentiates normal, precancerous, and cancerous squamous epithelial tissues,”
Cancer Res., 65
(4), 1180
–1186
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3031 CNREA8 0008-5472 Google Scholar
J. C. M. Schlachetzki and M. Hüll,
“Microglial activation in Alzheimer’s disease,”
Curr. Alzheimer Res., 6
(6), 554
–563
(2009). https://doi.org/10.2174/156720509790147179 Google Scholar
M. E. Lull and M. L. Block,
“Microglial activation and chronic neurodegeneration,”
Neurotherapeutics, 7
(4), 354
–365
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurt.2010.05.014 Google Scholar
V. H. Perry, J. A. R. Nicoll and C. Holmes,
“Microglia in neurodegenerative disease,”
Nat. Rev. Neurol., 6
(4), 193
–201
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2010.17 Google Scholar
D. M. Norden and J. P. Godbout,
“Microglia of the aged brain: primed to be activated and resistant to regulation,”
Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol., 39
(1), 19
–34
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2990.2012.01306.x NANEDL 1365-2990 Google Scholar
M. W. Conklin et al.,
“Fluorescence lifetime imaging of endogenous fluorophores in histopathology sections reveals differences between normal and tumor epithelium in carcinoma in situ of the breast,”
Cell Biochem. Biophys., 53
(3), 145
–157
(2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-009-9046-7 Google Scholar
S. Chakraborty et al.,
“Quantification of the metabolic state in cell-model of Parkinson’s disease by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy,”
Sci. Rep., 6
(1), 19145
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19145 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar
M. S. Islam et al.,
“pH dependence of the fluorescence lifetime of FAD in solution and in cells,”
Int. J. Mol. Sci., 14
(1), 1952
–1963
(2013). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14011952 1422-0067 Google Scholar
M. C. Skala et al.,
“In vivo multiphoton microscopy of NADH and FAD redox states, fluorescence lifetimes, and cellular morphology in precancerous epithelia,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 104
(49), 19494
–19499
(2007). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0708425104 Google Scholar
S. K. Biswas and A. Mantovani,
“Orchestration of metabolism by macrophages,”
Cell Metab., 15
(4), 432
–437
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2011.11.013 1550-4131 Google Scholar
S. Galván-Peña and L. A. J. O’Neill,
“Metabolic reprograming in macrophage polarization,”
Front. Immunol., 5 420
(2014). https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00420 Google Scholar
D. Vats et al.,
“Oxidative metabolism and PGC-1beta attenuate macrophage-mediated inflammation,”
Cell Metab., 4
(1), 13
–24
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2006.05.011 1550-4131 Google Scholar
J. V. Chacko and K. W. Eliceiri,
“NAD(P)H fluorescence lifetime measurements in fixed biological tissues,”
Methods Appl. Fluoresc., 7
(4), 044005
(2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/2050-6120/ab47e5 Google Scholar
E. M. York et al.,
“Green fluorescent protein emission obscures metabolic fluorescent lifetime imaging of NAD(P)H,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 10
(9), 4381
–4394
(2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.004381 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar
R. M. Ransohoff,
“A polarizing question: do M1 and M2 microglia exist?,”
Nat. Neurosci., 19
(8), 987
–991
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4338 NANEFN 1097-6256 Google Scholar
M. T. Heneka et al.,
“Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease,”
Lancet Neurol., 14
(4), 388
–405
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)70016-5 Google Scholar
BiographyMd. Abdul K. Sagar is a postdoctoral researcher in the Eliceiri group in the University of Wisconsin–Madison. He works on making fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) more practical by improving FLIM hardware, developing FLIM software, and developing FLIM-based cellular assays. He completed his MS degree in 2015 in electrical engineering and his PhD in 2019 in biomedical engineering, UW–Madison working on biophotonics techniques. He worked as a senior software engineer at Samsung Research, Bangladesh, before that. Jonathan N. Ouellette is a graduate student in the Eliceiri group in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. His research focuses on the application of FLIM and machine learning to identify microglia and their activation states, and to distinguish them from infiltrating macrophages and all other cell types in the brain. He received his BS degree in biology from UW–Madison in 2013. Kevin P. Cheng received his PhD in biomedical engineering in 2016 from the University of Wisconsin-Madison performing work studying the effects of optical light stimulation on the central nervous system. He graduated from Purdue University in 2009 with a bachelor’s degree in biomedical engineering. He currently works as a research scientist at the Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering on developing, testing, and validating neuromodulation technology and approaches for therapeutic applications. Justin C. Williams is the Vilas distinguished achievement professor of biomedical engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. He received his MSc and PhD degrees in bioengineering in 2001 from Arizona State University and postdoctoral training in neurosurgery from the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor. He joined the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin in 2003. His research interests include BioMEMS, neuroprostheses, and functional neurosurgery. Jyoti J. Watters is a professor of pharmacology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the Department of Comparative Biosciences in 2002. She received her PhD in pharmacology from the University of Washington in Seattle in 1997. She studies mechanisms of microglial signal transduction and regulation of gene transcription following chronic neuroinflammatory stimuli. Her current research focuses on how early life exposure to paradigms of hypoxia epigenetically alter long-term microglial activities and their impact on neural function. Kevin W. Eliceiri is the RRF Walter H. Helmerich professor of medical physics and biomedical engineering at the University of Wisconsin at Madison and investigator in the Morgridge Institute for Research in Madison, Wisconsin. He is also an associate director of the McPherson Eye Research Institute. He has published over 200 papers on optical imaging instrumentation, open source image informatics, and role of the cellular microenvironment in disease. He is a member of both OSA and SPIE. |