Excitation of multiple surface-plasmon-polariton waves using a compound surface-relief grating

Muhammad Faryad; Akhlesh Lakhtakia

doi:10.1117/1.JNP.6.061701

24 September 2012 Excitation of multiple surface-plasmon-polariton waves using a compound surface-relief grating

Muhammad Faryad, Akhlesh Lakhtakia

Author Affiliations +

Funded by: National Science Foundation, US National Science Foundation, National Science Foundation NSF CBET, National Science Foundation for partial financial support

Journal of Nanophotonics, Vol. 6, Issue 1, 061701 (September 2012). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JNP.6.061701

Abstract

The excitation of multiple surface-plasmon-polariton waves, all of the same frequency but different polarization states, phase speeds, spatial profiles and degrees of localization, by a compound surface-relief grating formed by a metal and a rugate filter, both of finite thickness, was studied using the rigorous coupled-wave approach. Each period of the compound surface-relief grating was chosen to have an integral number of periods of two different simple surface-relief gratings. The excitation of different SPP waves was inferred from the absorptance peaks that were independent of the thickness of the rugate filter. The excitation of each SPP wave could be attributed to either a simple surface-relief grating present in the compound surface-relief grating or to the compound surface-relief grating itself. However, the excitation of SPP waves was found to be less efficient with the compound surface-relief grating than with a simple surface-relief grating.

1. Introduction

The solution of a canonical boundary-value problem demonstrates that the planar interface of (1) a semi-infinite metal, and (2) a semi-infinite homogeneous, isotropic, dielectric material can guide one surface plasmon-polariton (SPP) wave, at a specific frequency and in a specific direction lying in the interface plane.¹^,² This SPP wave is of the $p$ -polarization state. In practice, SPP waves are excited in the prism-coupled and the grating-coupled configurations. The prism-coupled configuration is widely used for chemical sensing.² Whereas the grating-coupled configuration has been known for at least three decades to be useful in enhancing the absorptance of solar cells,³^,⁴ this enhancement has only recently been interpreted in terms of SPP waves.⁵^,⁶

In the grating-coupled configuration, the planar interface is replaced by one with periodic corrugations. This interface is a surface-relief grating. Light is then incident on the other face of the partnering dielectric material. The electromagnetic field phasors are expressed in terms of Floquet harmonics. If the period of the surface-relief grating is appropriate, a part of the incident light may couple to the SPP wave at a certain value of the incidence angle. This happens when one of the Floquet harmonics has a wavevector with a component parallel to the mean plane of the grating the same as the real part of the possible SPP wave.²^,⁷

Recently, to enhance the possibility of this match occurring, Dolev et al.⁸ made the surface-relief grating a compound grating, called a quasiperiodic grating by them. Each period of the compound grating comprises several periods each of more than one simple surface-relief gratings. Dolev et al.⁸ showed that such a compound grating can be advantageously used to excite the same $p$ -polarized SPP wave at different angles of incidence.

Multiple SPP waves of the same frequency and direction of propagation, but with different phase speeds, spatial profiles, and degrees of localizations, can be guided by the planar interface of a metal and a dielectric material that is periodically nonhomogeneous normal to the interface, whether that interface is either planar⁹ or a simple surface-relief grating.¹⁰ The multiplicity offers exciting prospects for enhancing the scope of applications of SPP waves.¹¹^,¹² Chief among these are multianalyte chemical sensors¹³ and thin-film solar cells.¹⁴ The higher the number of SPP waves that can be excited, the more attractive are the prospects.

Although multiple SPP waves can be excited in the grating-coupled configuration,¹⁰ in line with predictions from the solution of the canonical boundary-value problem,⁹ a simple surface-relief grating may not suffice for the excitation of all possible SPP waves. With simple surface-relief gratings of different periods, different subsets of the possible SPP waves may be excited,¹⁰ which limits the benefits resulting from multiple SPP waves. Therefore, we decided to investigate whether a compound surface-relief grating would be better than a simple surface-relief grating.

Let us note the important difference between the work presented here and that of Dolev et al.:⁸ the partnering dielectric material in our work is periodically nonhomogeneous normal to the mean metal/dielectric interface, allowing the excitation of multiple SPP waves of the same frequency but different linear polarization states, phase speeds, and spatial profiles, thereby in contrast to Dolev et al.⁸ whose partnering dielectric material is homogeneous.

Because the theoretical formulation of the boundary-value problem discussed in this paper is the same as in Ref. 10, only a brief overview of the formulation is provided in Sec. 2. Illustrative numerical results are presented and discussed in Sec. 3, and the concluding remarks are presented in Sec. 4. An $\exp (- i ω t)$ time-dependence is implicit, with $ω$ denoting the angular frequency. The free-space wavenumber, the free-space wavelength, and the intrinsic impedance of free space are denoted by $k_{0} = ω \sqrt{ϵ_{0} μ_{0}}$ , $λ_{0} = 2 π / k_{0}$ , and $η_{0} = \sqrt{μ_{0} / ϵ_{0}}$ , respectively, with $μ_{0}$ and $ϵ_{0}$ being the permeability and permittivity of free space. Vectors are in boldface, the asterisk denotes the complex conjugate, and the Cartesian unit vectors are identified as ${\hat{u}}_{x}$ , ${\hat{u}}_{y}$ , and ${\hat{u}}_{z}$ . The real part of a complex number $ζ$ is denoted by $Re (ζ)$ .

2. Boundary-Value Problem

Let us consider the boundary-value problem shown schematically in Fig. 1. The regions $z < 0$ and $z > d_{3}$ are vacuous. The region $0 \leq z \leq d_{1}$ is occupied by a rugate filter¹⁵^,¹⁶ with relative permittivity

Eq. (1)

ϵ_{d} (z) = {[(\frac{n_{b} + n_{a}}{2}) + (\frac{n_{b} - n_{a}}{2}) \sin (π \frac{d_{2} - z}{Ω})]}^{2}, z > 0,

where

2 Ω

is the period, and

n_{a}

and

n_{b}

are the lowest and the highest indexes of refraction, respectively. Such filters can be deposited on top of a metallic film with a corrugated surface with a variety of well-established techniques.¹⁷^–¹⁹ The region

d_{2} \leq z \leq d_{3}

is occupied by the metallic partnering material with spatially uniform relative permittivity

ϵ_{m}

.

Fig. 1

Schematic of the grating-coupled configuration used for the excitation of multiple SPP waves by an incident plane wave. Specular reflection and transmission are denoted by order $n = 0$ , whereas nonspecular modes are denoted by orders $n \neq 0$ . The SPP waves are guided by the periodically corrugated metal/rugate-filter interface.

The region $d_{1} < z < d_{2}$ contains a compound surface-relief grating of period $L$ along the $x$ axis. The relative permittivity $ϵ_{g} (x, z) = ϵ_{g} (x \pm L, z)$ in this region is taken to be as

Eq. (2)

ϵ_{g} (x, z) = ϵ_{m} - [ϵ_{m} - ϵ_{d} (z)] U [d_{2} - z - g (x)], x \in (0, L),

for

z \in (d_{1}, d_{2})

, with

Eq. (3)

g (x) = {\begin{array}{c} \frac{1}{2} (d_{2} - d_{1}) [1 + \sin (2 π \frac{x}{Λ_{1}})], & x \in (0, L_{1}), \\ \frac{1}{2} (d_{2} - d_{1}) [1 + \sin (2 π \frac{x - L_{1}}{Λ_{2}})], & x \in (L_{1}, L), \end{array}

and

Eq. (4)

U (ζ) = {\begin{matrix}  \end{matrix} \begin{matrix} 1, & ζ \geq 0, \\ 0, & ζ < 0 . \end{matrix}

The chosen compound surface-relief grating is made of two simple surface-relief gratings, one of period

Λ_{1}

and the other of period

Λ_{2}

. Both of the simple gratings have a sinusoidal profile. For simplicity, both simple gratings have the same crest-to-trough distance

d_{2} - d_{1}

, and the depth

L_{g}

of the compound surface-relief grating therefore is also the same:

L_{g} = d_{2} - d_{1}

. Each period of the compound grating comprises

N_{1}

consecutive periods of the simple grating with period

Λ_{1}

and

N_{2}

consecutive periods of the simple grating with period

Λ_{2}

; hence,

L = L_{1} + L_{2}

,

L_{1} = N_{1} Λ_{1}

(

N_{1} \in {1, 2, 3, \dots}

), and

L_{2} = N_{2} Λ_{2}

(

N_{2} \in {1, 2, 3, \dots}

).

We chose this particular grating-shape function $g (x)$ because sinusoidal surface-relief gratings are the easiest type of grating for theoretical studies of the excitation of SPP waves.⁷ Simple gratings with nonsinusoidal profiles can be investigated with the theoretical formulation adopted here.¹⁰ Furthermore, more than two simple gratings can be incorporated in a compound grating.

In the vacuous half-space $z \leq 0$ , let a plane wave propagating in the $x z$ plane at an angle $θ$ to the $z$ axis, be incident on the compound surface-relief grating coated with the rugate filter. Hence, the incident, reflected, and transmitted electric field phasors may be written in terms of Floquet harmonics as follows:

Eq. (5)

E_{inc} (r) = \sum_{n = - N_{t}}^{n = N_{t}} (s_{n} a_{s}^{(n)} + p_{n}^{+} a_{p}^{(n)}) \exp [i (k_{x}^{(n)} x + k_{z}^{(n)} z)], z \leq 0,

Eq. (6)

E_{ref} (r) = \sum_{n = - N_{t}}^{n = N_{t}} (s_{n} r_{s}^{(n)} + p_{n}^{-} r_{p}^{(n)}) \exp [i (k_{x}^{(n)} x - k_{z}^{(n)} z)], z \leq 0,

Eq. (7)

E_{tr} (r) = \sum_{n = - N_{t}}^{n = N_{t}} (s_{n} t_{s}^{(n)} + p_{n}^{+} t_{p}^{(n)}) \exp {i [k_{x}^{(n)} x + k_{z}^{(n)} (z - d_{3})]}, z \geq d_{3} .

Here,

Eq. (8)

k_{x}^{(n)} = k_{0} \sin θ + n κ_{x}

is the wavenumber of the Floquet harmonic of order

n

, with

Eq. (9)

κ_{x} = \frac{2 π}{L} = \frac{2 π}{N_{1} L_{1} + N_{2} L_{2}},

and

Eq. (10)

k_{z}^{(n)} = {\begin{matrix} + \sqrt{k_{0}^{2} - {(k_{x}^{(n)})}^{2}}, & k_{0}^{2} > {(k_{x}^{(n)})}^{2} \\ + i \sqrt{{(k_{x}^{(n)})}^{2} - k_{0}^{2}}, & k_{0}^{2} < {(k_{x}^{(n)})}^{2} \end{matrix} .

The

s

and

p

-polarization states are represented, respectively, by

Eq. (11)

s_{n} = {\hat{u}}_{y}

and

Eq. (12)

p_{n}^{\pm} = \mp \frac{k_{z}^{(n)}}{k_{0}} {\hat{u}}_{x} + \frac{k_{x}^{(n)}}{k_{0}} {\hat{u}}_{z} .

The coefficients

a_{s}^{(n)} = a_{p}^{(n)} = 0 \forall n \in [- N_{t}, N_{t}]

, except that

a_{s}^{(0)} \neq 0

when the incident plane wave is

s

-polarized and

a_{p}^{(0)} \neq 0

when the incident plane wave is

p

-polarized. The coefficients

r_{s, p}^{(n)}

and

t_{s, p}^{(n)}

have to be determined by solving a boundary-value problem.

That boundary-value problem was formulated using the rigorous coupled-wave approach (RCWA)²⁰^,²¹ and was implemented using a stable algorithm.²²^–²⁴ The accuracy of the solution using RCWA depends on the value of $N_{t}$ , the number of terms of Floquet harmonics in the representation of field phasors being $2 N_{t} + 1$ . The formulation of the boundary-value problem and the numerical algorithm have been explained elsewhere in detail¹⁰ and we skip both to go directly to present representative numerical results in Sec. 3.

3. Numerical Results and Discussion

For illustrative numerical results, we chose a rugate filter with $Ω = λ_{0}$ , $n_{a} = 1.45$ and $n_{b} = 2.32$ (Ref. 10). We set the free-space wavelength $λ_{0} = 633 nm$ and chose the metal to be bulk aluminum ( $ϵ_{met} = - 56 + 21 i$ ).

The plane wave absorptance of the entire structure depicted in Fig. 1 is given by

Eq. (13)

A = 1 - \sum_{n = - N_{t}}^{N_{t}} \frac{{| r_{s}^{(n)} |}^{2} + {| r_{p}^{(n)} |}^{2} + {| t_{s}^{(n)} |}^{2} + {| t_{p}^{(n)} |}^{2}}{{| a_{s}^{(0)} |}^{2} + {| a_{p}^{(0)} |}^{2}} Re (\frac{k_{z}^{(n)}}{k_{z}^{(0)}}) .

The absorptance for

p

-polarized incidence is denoted by

A_{p} = A |_{a_{s}^{(0)} = 0, a_{p}^{(0)} \neq 0}

, and that for

s

-polarized incidence by

A_{s} = A |_{a_{s}^{(0)} \neq 0, a_{p}^{(0)} = 0}

. Let us note that

r_{s}^{(n)} = 0

and

t_{s}^{(n)} = 0 \forall n \in [- N_{t}, N_{t}]

for

p

-polarized incident plane waves, and vice versa for the

s

-polarized case, because the partnering dielectric material is isotropic.

We implemented the RCWA in Mathematica and calculated the absorptances $A_{p}$ and $A_{s}$ as functions of $θ$ . We fixed $N_{t} = 40$ after ascertaining that the absorptances for $N_{t} = 40$ converged to within $\pm 1 %$ of the absorptances calculated with $N_{t} = 41$ . Also, the electric field phasor $E (x, z)$ , the magnetic field phasor $H (x, z)$ , and the time-averaged Poynting vector

Eq. (14)

P (x, z) = \frac{1}{2} Re [E (x, z) \times H^{*} (x, z)],

were calculated as appropriate. For this purpose, the region

0 < z < d_{1}

was divided into 3-nm-thick slices parallel to the plane

z = 0

, the grating region (

d_{1} < z < d_{2}

) was divided into 1-nm-thick slices, but the metallic layer (

d_{2} < z < d_{3}

) was kept as one slice.

3.1.

Canonical Boundary-Value Problem

The corresponding canonical boundary-value problem, when both the rugate filter and the metal are semi-infinite in thickness and their interface is planar, has been solved elsewhere.⁹ With the assumption that an SPP wave propagates along the $x$ axis with an $\exp (i κ x)$ variation and is independent of $y$ , the solution of the canonical problem yields values of the wavenumber $κ$ . We found that for the chosen constitutive parameters of both partnering materials, five $p$ -polarized and four $s$ -polarized SPP waves are allowed. Their relative wavenumbers $κ / k_{0}$ are provided in Table 1.

Table 1

Relative wavenumbers κ/k0 at λ0=633 nm of possible SPP waves guided by the planar interface of aluminum (ϵmet=−56+21i) and a rugate filter (Ω=λ0, na=1.45 and nb=2.32) from the solution of the canonical boundary-value problem.9

$s$ -pol	$1.48639 + 0.00132 i$	$1.7324 + 0.00 4 i$ *	$1.9836 + 0.0006 i$ *
$s$ -pol	$2.2128 + 9.6 \times 10^{- 5} i$ *
$p$ -pol	$1.36479 + 0.00169 i$	$1.61782 + 0.00548 i$	$1.87437 + 0.00998 i$
$p$ -pol	$2.06995 + 0.01526 i$	$2.21456 + 0.00246 i$

^*These solutions had been missed when solutions for Fig. 1 of Ref. 9 were numerically searched.

3.2.

Grating-Coupled Configuration

The compound surface-relief grating was chosen with $N_{1} = N_{2} = 3$ , $Λ_{1} = 0.75 λ_{0}$ , $Λ_{2} = λ_{0}$ , and $L_{g} = 50 nm$ ; furthermore, $d_{3} - d_{2} = 30 nm$ . These specific parameters are consistent with experience acquired from working with simple surface-relief gratings.¹⁰

Plots of $A_{p}$ and $A_{s}$ as functions of $θ$ are presented in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively, for $d_{1} \in {4 Ω, 6 Ω}$ . These plots contain several peaks. The peaks that are independent of the thickness of the partnering dielectric material beyond a certain threshold thickness indicate the excitation of SPP waves,¹⁰ whereas the remaining peaks could represent the excitation of waveguide modes²⁵^,²⁶ that must depend on the thickness of the partnering dielectric material.

Fig. 2

$A_{s}$ versus $θ$ , when $N_{1} = N_{2} = 3$ , $Λ_{1} = 0.75 λ_{0}$ , $Λ_{2} = λ_{0}$ , $L_{g} = 50 nm$ , $d_{3} - d_{2} = 30 nm$ , and $λ_{0} = 633 nm$ . The vertical arrows and the stars identify the peaks that represent the excitation of $s$ -polarized SPP waves: the arrows with single line (double line) represent the peaks that are also present in the absorptance curves when the compound grating is replaced with a simple grating with $N_{2} = 0$ ( $N_{1} = 0$ ), but the stars represent the peaks that are not present when either $N_{1} = 0$ or $N_{2} = 0$ .

Fig. 3

Same as Fig. 2, except that $A_{p}$ is plotted instead of $A_{s}$ .

3.2.1.

Excitation of $s$ -polarized SPP waves

In the plots of $A_{s}$ versus $θ$ in Fig. 2, nine peaks, identified by vertical arrows and stars, are present independent of the thickness of the partnering dielectric material (i.e., the rugate filter). The angular positions of these $A_{s}$ -peaks are $θ = 19.0 \deg$ , 22.2 deg, 26.7 deg, 31.0 deg, 34.6 deg, 39.8 deg, 49.3 deg, 56.1 deg, and 61.4 deg; all angular positions in this paper were read from absorptance plots with the angle of incidence varying in steps of 0.1 deg. The conclusion that the identified peaks represent the excitation of $s$ -polarized SPP waves is upheld by the spatial profiles of the $x$ -component of the time-averaged Poynting vector in one unit cell ( $0 < x < L, 0 < z < d_{3}$ ).

In Fig. 4, the variation of $P_{x} (x, z) = {\hat{u}}_{x} \dot{P} (x, z)$ is provided for two values of $θ : 19.0 \deg$ and 22.2 deg. The figure confirms that the power density of the $s$ -polarized SPP waves is maximal in the region near the plane $z = d_{1}$ and decays away from that region. Moreover, most of the energy of each SPP wave resides in the rugate filter rather than in the metal. As the spatial profiles in the top and bottom panels of Fig. 4 are different for the different values of $θ$ , each of the two values of $θ$ is associated with the excitation of different SPP waves.

Fig. 4

Variation of the $x$ -component $P_{x}$ (in $W m^{- 2}$ ) of the time-averaged Poynting vector $P (x, z)$ when (top) $θ = 19.0 \deg$ and (bottom) $θ = 22.2 \deg$ , the incident plane wave is $s$ polarized ( $a_{s}^{(0)} = 1 V m^{- 1}$ , $a_{p}^{(0)} = 0$ ), and $d_{1} = 4 Ω$ . Other parameters are the same as for Fig. 2.

In Fig. 5, the spatial variation of $P_{x}$ is provided for two other values of $θ : 39.8 \deg$ and 56.1 deg. This figure again shows that an $s$ -polarized SPP wave is excited at each of these two values of $θ$ ; however, the same $s$ -polarized SPP wave is excited at both of these angles of incidence. This observation is not surprising as it has already been shown elsewhere¹⁰ that the same SPP wave can be excited in the grating-coupled configuration at different angles of incidence.

Fig. 5

Same as Fig. 4, except that (top) $θ = 39.8 \deg$ and (bottom) $θ = 56.1 \deg$ .

Let us also note that $P_{x} > 0$ in all the spatial profiles presented in Figs. 4 and 5 implying that these SPP waves propagate parallel to ${\hat{u}}_{x}$ . This was found true for all $s$ -polarized SPP waves excited at the peaks identified in Fig. 2 by vertical arrows and stars.

In the grating-coupled configuration, an SPP wave is excited whenever the real part of the wavenumber $κ$ from the canonical boundary-value problem matches the wavenumber $k_{x}^{(n)}$ of the Floquet harmonic of order $n$ for some $n \in [- N_{t}, N_{t}]$ . These wavenumbers of the Floquet harmonics depend on the period $L$ of the surface-relief grating. Also, if the SPP wave is propagating parallel to ${\hat{u}}_{x}$ ( $- {\hat{u}}_{x}$ ) in our formulation of the problem, it is excited as a Floquet harmonic of positive (negative) order.

In the light of the foregoing discussion, let us now explain the roles of the two simple surface-relief gratings constituting the compound surface-relief grating in the excitation of multiple SPP waves. The relative wavenumbers $k_{x}^{(n)} / k_{0}$ of several Floquet harmonics are provided in Table 2 for:

• Case 1: $N_{1} = 1$ and $N_{2} = 0$ (i.e., $L = Λ_{1}$ ) and
• Case 2: $N_{1} = 0$ and $N_{2} = 1$ (i.e., $L = Λ_{2}$ ),

at the values of $θ$ identified by vertical arrows and stars in Fig. 2. Plots of $A_{s}$ versus $θ$ for these two cases are provided in Fig. 6 to compare the $A_{s}$ -peaks for the compound surface-relief grating with those for the individual simple surface-relief gratings. For the computation of absorptances when either $N_{1} = 0$ or $N_{2} = 0$ , $N_{t} = 8$ was sufficient because the period $L$ is much smaller than for the compound grating and a converged solution can be obtained with a smaller value of $N_{t}$ . We also identify

• Case 3: $N_{1} = N_{2} = 3$ ,

which is the case of the chosen compound surface-relief grating, for ease of discussion. The relative wavenumbers of several Floquet harmonics are at the $θ$ -positions of the $A_{s}$ -peaks identified by stars are provided in Table 3 for case 3 only.

Fig. 6

$A_{s}$ versus $θ$ when $L_{g} = 50 nm$ , $d_{3} - d_{2} = 30 nm$ , $λ_{0} = 633 nm$ , for case 1 and case 2. The vertical arrows identify the peaks that represent the excitation of SPP waves.

Table 2

Relative wavenumbers kx(n)/k0 of Floquet harmonics, at the θ-values of the peaks identified in Fig. 2 by vertical arrows and stars, when the compound surface-relief grating is replaced by just one of its two constituent simple surface-relief gratings. Case 1: N1=1 and N2=1. Case 2: N1=1 and N2=1. Boldface entries signify SPP waves.

	Case	$n = - 2$	$n = - 1$	$n = 0$	$n = 1$	$n = 2$
$θ = 19.0 \deg$	1	$- 2.3411$	$- 1.0078$	0.32557	1.6589	2.9922
$θ = 19.0 \deg$	2	$- 1.6744$	$- 0.67443$	0.32557	1.3256	2.3256
$θ = 22.2 \deg$	1	$- 2.2888$	$- 0.95549$	0.37784	1.7112	3.0445
$θ = 22.2 \deg$	2	$- 1.6222$	$- 0.62216$	0.37784	1.3778	2.3778
$θ = 26.7 \deg$	1	$- 2.2173$	$- 0.88401$	0.44932	1.7827	3.116
$θ = 26.7 \deg$	2	$- 1.5507$	$- 0.55068$	0.44932	1.4493	2.4493
$θ = 31.0 \deg$	1	$- 2.1516$	$- 0.8183$	0.51504	1.8484	3.1817
$θ = 31.0 \deg$	2	$- 1.485$	$- 0.48496$	0.5150	1.5150	2.5150
$θ = 34.6 \deg$	1	$- 2.0988$	$- 0.76549$	0.56784	1.9012	3.2345
$θ = 34.6 \deg$	2	$- 1.4322$	$- 0.43216$	0.56784	1.5678	2.5678
$θ = 39.8 \deg$	1	$- 2.0266$	$- 0.69322$	0.64011	1.9734	3.3068
$θ = 39.8 \deg$	2	$- 1.3599$	$- 0.35989$	0.64011	1.6401	2.6401
$θ = 49.3 \deg$	1	$- 1.9085$	$- 0.5752$	0.75813	2.0915	3.4248
$θ = 49.3 \deg$	2	$- 1.2419$	$- 0.24187$	0.75813	1.7581	2.7581
$θ = 56.1 \deg$	1	$- 1.8367$	$- 0.50332$	0.83001	2.1633	3.4967
$θ = 56.1 \deg$	2	$- 1.17$	$- 0.16999$	0.83001	1.8300	2.8300
$θ = 61.4 \deg$	1	$- 1.7887$	$- 0.45535$	0.87798	2.2113	3.5446
$θ = 61.4 \deg$	2	$- 1.122$	$- 0.12202$	0.87798	1.878	2.878

Table 3

Relative wavenumbers kx(n)/k0 of Floquet harmonics, at the θ-values of the peaks identified in Fig. 2 by stars when the s-polarized SPP waves are excited by the compound grating. Case 3: N1=N2=3. Boldface entries signify SPP waves.

	Case	$n = 3$	$n = 4$	$n = 5$	$n = 6$	$n = 7$	$n = 8$
$θ = 19.0 \deg$	3	0.897	1.0875	1.2779	1.4684	1.6589	1.8494
$θ = 26.7 \deg$	3	1.0207	1.2112	1.4017	1.5922	1.7827	1.9731
$θ = 34.6 \deg$	3	1.1393	1.3297	1.5202	1.7107	1.9012	2.0917
$θ = 56.1 \deg$	3	1.4014	1.5919	1.7824	1.9729	2.1633	2.3538

The solution of the canonical boundary-value problem predicts the existence of an $s$ -polarized SPP wave with $κ / k_{0} = 1.7324 + 0.0014 i$ . According to Table 2, the simple surface-relief grating of period $Λ_{1}$ alone is responsible for its excitation in the grating-coupled configuration at $θ = 22.2 \deg$ in Fig. 2, because $k_{x}^{(1)} / k_{0} |_{Case 1} = 1.7112$ is quite close to 1.7324. Furthermore, the leftmost $A_{s}$ -peak identified in Fig. 6(a) by an arrow is at the same angular position as the $A_{s}$ -peak of interest in Fig. 2.

Similarly, the solution of the canonical boundary-value problem predicts the existences of $s$ -polarized SPP waves with $κ / k_{0} = 1.9836 + 0.0006 i$ and $2.2128 + 10^{- 5} i$ (Table 1). $A_{s}$ -peaks are present at $θ = 39.8 \deg$ and 61.4 deg in Fig. 2. Both of these SPP waves are excited in the grating-coupled configuration due to the presence of the simple grating with period $Λ_{1}$ because $k_{x}^{(1)} / k_{0} |_{Case 1} = 1.9734$ for $θ = 39.8 \deg$ , and $k_{x}^{(1)} / k_{0} |_{Case 1} = 2.2113$ for $θ = 61.4 \deg$ in Table 2. Moreover, these $A_{s}$ -peaks are also present at $θ = {39.9}^{} \deg$ and 61.4 deg in Fig. 6(a).

The two $A_{s}$ -peaks identified by double arrows, at $θ \in {31.0 \deg, 49.3 \deg}$ , in Fig. 2 represent the excitation of $s$ -polarized SPP waves due to the presence of simple grating of period $Λ_{2}$ . A comparison of Tables 1 and 2 shows that $k_{x}^{(1)} / k_{0} |_{Case 2} = 1.5150$ for $θ = 31.0 \deg$ , and $k_{x}^{(1)} / k_{0} |_{Case 2} = 1.7581$ for $θ = 49.3 \deg$ are close to $Re (1.4864 + 0.0013 i)$ and $Re (1.7324 + 0.0014 i)$ , respectively. These $A_{s}$ -peaks identified by double arrows in Fig. 2 (at $θ = 31.0 \deg$ and 49.3 deg) are also present in Fig. 6(b) at $θ = 27.9 \deg$ and 45.5 deg, respectively. The difference in the angular positions of each peak in the two figures is entirely due to the presence of the simple surface-relief grating of period $Λ_{1}$ in the compound surface-relief grating.

The $A_{s}$ -peaks identified by stars in Fig. 2 at $θ \in {19.0 \deg, 26.7 \deg, 34.6 \deg, 56.1 \deg}$ indicate the SPP waves that cannot be explained by either case 1 or case 2, because corresponding peaks are not present in Fig. 6(a) and 6(b). Instead, the entire compound surface-relief grating is involved as follows: At $θ = 19.0 \deg$ , the SPP wave is excited as a Floquet harmonic of order $n = 6$ because $k_{x}^{(6)} / k_{0} |_{Case 3} = 1.4684$ is close to $Re (1.4864 + 0.0013 i)$ in Table 1; at $θ = 26.7 \deg$ , the SPP wave is excited as a Floquet harmonic of order $n = 8$ because $k_{x}^{(8)} / k_{0} |_{Case 3} = 1.9731$ is close to $Re (1.9836 + 0.0006 i)$ in Table 1; at $θ = 34.6 \deg$ , the SPP wave is excited as a Floquet harmonic of order $n = 6$ because $k_{x}^{(6)} / k_{0} |_{Case 3} = 1.7107$ is close to $Re (1.7324 + 0.0014 i)$ in Table 1; and at $θ = 56.1 \deg$ , the SPP wave is excited as a Floquet harmonic of order $n = 6$ because $k_{x}^{(6)} / k_{0} |_{Case 3} = 1.9729$ is close to $Re (1.9836 + 0.0006 i)$ likewise. Thus, these SPP waves arise from a cooperative phenomenon which merges the distinct identities of the two constituent simple surface-relief gratings into a single identity. Let us also note that the excitation of the SPP wave at $θ = 26.7 \deg$ is not as efficient as at the other peaks identified by stars in Fig. 2 because the SPP wave is being excited as a Floquet harmonic of higher order when $θ = 26.7 \deg$ than for the other three values of $θ$ (Refs. 7, 10).

A comparison of the magnitudes of $A_{s}$ at the absorptance peaks in Figs. 2 and 6 shows that an $A_{s}$ -peak for an individual simple surface-relief grating (cases 1 and 2) is generally higher than the corresponding $A_{s}$ -peak for the compound surface-relief grating (case 3).

In summary, nine $A_{s}$ -peaks in Fig. 2 that represent the excitation of $s$ -polarized SPP waves can be divided into three groups: (1) three peaks due to the presence of the simple surface-relief grating with period $Λ_{1}$ , (2) two peaks due to the presence of the simple surface-relief grating with period $Λ_{2}$ , and (3) four peaks due to the compound surface-relief grating itself with period $L = 3 Λ_{1} + 3 Λ_{2}$ . The relative wavenumbers $κ / k_{0}$ of $s$ -polarized SPP waves in the canonical problem (Table 1) are correlated in Table 4 with the $θ$ -values of the $A_{s}$ -peaks in Fig. 2 that represent the excitation of these SPP waves in case 3. Correlation of some of those peaks with the $A_{s}$ -peaks in Fig. 6(a) and 6(b), for cases 1 and 2, respectively, is also presented in the same table. All $s$ -polarized SPP waves predicted by the solution of the canonical boundary-value problem can be excited by the compound surface-relief grating, but neither of the two constituent simple surface-relief gratings is, by itself, able to do the same. The $A_{s}$ -peaks that are attributable to the simple surface-relief grating with period $Λ_{2}$ are shifted to somewhat higher angular positions, and the shift becomes more pronounced as the incidence becomes more oblique, whereas the peaks attributable to the other simple grating with period $Λ_{1}$ remain almost at the same angular position except for one peak that shifts to lower angular position.

Table 4

The relative wavenumbers κ/k0 of s-polarized SPP waves in the canonical problem (Table 1) and the θ-values of the As-peaks in Figs. 6(a), 6(b), and 2 that represent the excitation of these SPP waves in cases 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

$κ / k_{0}$	$θ$
$κ / k_{0}$	Fig. 6(a)	Fig. 6(b)	Fig. 2
$1.48639 + 0.00132 i$	—	—	19.0 deg
$1.48639 + 0.00132 i$	—	27.9 deg	31.0 deg
$1.7324 + 0.0014 i$	22.2 deg	—	22.2 deg
	—	—	34.6 deg
	—	45.5 deg	49.3 deg
$1.9836 + 0.0006 i$	—	—	26.7 deg
	39.9 deg	—	39.8 deg
	—	—	56.1 deg
$2.2128 + 9.6 \times 10^{- 5} i$	61.4 deg	—	61.4 deg

3.2.2.

Excitation of $p$ -polarized SPP waves

In the plots of $A_{p}$ versus $θ$ provided in Fig. 3 for $d_{1} \in {4 Ω, 6 Ω}$ , the $A_{p}$ -peaks that are independent of the thickness of the rugate filter are identified by vertical arrows and stars. Such $A_{p}$ -peaks are present for $θ \in {12.0 \deg, 19.5 \deg, 23.5 \deg, 27.6 \deg, 41.0 \deg, 47, 5 \deg, 56.3 \deg}$ and represent the excitation of $p$ -polarized SPP waves. Examination of the spatial profiles of $P_{x} (x, z)$ at these $θ$ -values confirmed the localization of the power density to the plane $z = d_{1}$ .

Representative profiles of $P_{x}$ in a unit cell of the compound surface-relief grating are provided for two identified $A_{p}$ -peaks in Fig. 7. The spatial profiles for $θ = 23.5 \deg$ and $θ = 27.5 \deg$ show that the power density of the $p$ -polarized SPP wave is maximal in the region near the plane $z = d_{1}$ and decays away from that region. Moreover, $P_{x}$ is predominantly positive implying that the $p$ -polarized SPP waves are propagating along ${\hat{u}}_{x}$ and are excited as Floquet harmonics of positive order. This was found to be true for all other $p$ -polarized SPP waves as well.

Fig. 7

Variation of the $x$ -component $P_{x}$ (in $W m^{- 2}$ ) of the time-averaged Poynting vector $P (x, z)$ when (a) $θ = 23.5 \deg$ and (b) $θ = 27.6 \deg$ , the incident plane wave is $p$ polarized ( $a_{s}^{(0)} = 0$ , $a_{p}^{(0)} = 1 V m^{- 1}$ ), and $d_{1} = 4 Ω$ . Other parameters are the same as for Fig. 3.

The relative wavenumbers $k_{x}^{(n)} / k_{0}$ of several Floquet harmonics are provided in Table 5 for case 1 and case 2 at the $θ$ -values of the peaks identified in Fig. 3. Plots of $A_{p}$ versus $θ$ for these two cases are provided in Fig. 8 to compare the $A_{p}$ -peaks for the compound surface-relief grating with those for the individual simple surface-relief gratings.

Fig. 8

Same as Fig. 6, except that $A_{p}$ is plotted against $θ$ .

Table 5

Same as Table 2, except that the θ-values are of the Ap-peaks identified by vertical arrows and stars in Fig. 3.

	Case	$n = - 2$	$n = - 1$	$n = 0$	$n = 1$	$n = 2$
$θ = 12 \deg$	1	$- 2.4588$	$- 1.1254$	0.20791	1.5412	2.8746
$θ = 12 \deg$	2	$- 1.7921$	$- 0.79209$	0.20791	1.2079	2.2079
$θ = 19.5 \deg$	1	$- 2.3329$	$- 0.99953$	0.33381	1.6671	3.0005
$θ = 19.5 \deg$	2	$- 1.6662$	$- 0.66619$	0.33381	1.3338	2.3338
$θ = 23.5 \deg$	1	$- 2.2679$	$- 0.93458$	0.39875	1.7321	3.0654
$θ = 23.5 \deg$	2	$- 1.6013$	$- 0.60125$	0.39875	1.3987	2.3987
$θ = 27.6 \deg$	1	$- 2.2034$	$- 0.87004$	0.4633	1.7966	3.13
$θ = 27.6 \deg$	2	$- 1.5367$	$- 0.5367$	0.4633	1.4633	2.4633
$θ = 41.0 \deg$	1	$- 2.0106$	$- 0.67727$	0.65606	1.9894	3.3227
$θ = 41.0 \deg$	2	$- 1.3439$	$- 0.34394$	0.65606	1.6561	2.6561
$θ = 47.5 \deg$	1	$- 1.9294$	$- 0.59606$	0.73728	2.0706	3.4039
$θ = 47.5 \deg$	2	$- 1.2627$	$- 0.26272$	0.73728	1.7373	2.7373
$θ = 56.3 \deg$	1	$- 1.8347$	$- 0.50138$	$0.83195$	2.1653	3.4986
$θ = 56.3 \deg$	2	$- 1.168$	$- 0.16805$	0.83195	1.832	2.832

The $A_{p}$ -peaks identified by single arrows in Fig. 3 are also present at approximately the same angular positions in Fig. 8(a). Therefore, the $p$ -polarized SPP waves excited by the compound surface-relief grating for $θ \in {red 12.0 \deg, 27.6 \deg, 47.5 \deg, 56.3 \deg}$ can be attributed solely to the simple surface-relief grating with period $Λ_{1}$ . This is also evident from a comparison of Tables 1 and 5 because:

• $k_{x}^{(1)} / k_{0} |_{Case 1} = 1.5412$ is close to $Re (1.61782 + 0.00548 i)$ for $θ = 12.0 \deg$ ,
• $k_{x}^{(1)} / k_{0} |_{Case 1} = 1.7966$ is close to $Re (1.87437 + 0.00998 i)$ for $θ = 27.6 \deg$ ,
• $k_{x}^{(1)} / k_{0} |_{Case 1} = 2.0706$ is close to $Re (2.06995 + 0.01526 i)$ for $θ = 47.5 \deg$ , and
• $k_{x}^{(1)} / k_{0} |_{Case 1} = 2.1653$ is close to $Re (2.21456 + 0.00246 i)$ for $θ = 56.3 \deg$ .

A comparison of Figs. 3 and 8(b) shows that the $A_{p}$ -peaks due to the independent simple surface-relief grating with period $Λ_{1}$ (case 1) are slightly shifted to lower angular positions when that simple grating becomes part of the compound surface-relief grating (case 3), the shift being larger at the higher angular locations.

Similarly, the $A_{p}$ -peaks at $θ = 23.5 \deg$ and 41.0 deg, identified by double arrows in Fig. 3, are also present at approximately the same angular positions in Fig. 8(b) signifying that the $p$ -polarized SPP waves at these peaks are excited in effect by the presence of the simple surface-relief grating of period $Λ_{2}$ . Moreover,

• $k_{x}^{(1)} / k_{0} |_{Case 2} = 1.3987$ is close to $Re (1.36479 + 0.00169 i)$ for $θ = 23.5 \deg$ , and
• $k_{x}^{(1)} / k_{0} |_{Case 2} = 1.6561$ is close to $Re (1.61782 + 0.00548 i)$ for $θ = 41.0 \deg$ .

However, the $A_{p}$ -peaks at $θ = 20.5 \deg$ and $θ = 37.2 \deg$ in Fig. 8(b) for the simple surface-relief grating with period $Λ_{2}$ shift to $θ = 23.5 \deg$ and $θ = 41.0 \deg$ , respectively, in Fig. 3 when this simple surface-relief grating becomes part of the compound surface-relief grating.

The $A_{p}$ -peak identified by a star in Fig. 3 also represents the excitation of a $p$ -polarized SPP waves; however, this peak is not present in the plots of $A_{p}$ versus $θ$ in Fig. 8 for either case 1 or case 2. Also, the $A_{p}$ -peak at this value of $θ$ is very low, suggesting that the SPP wave is being excited as a Floquet harmonic of a high order at this peak by the compound surface-relief grating with period $L = 3 Λ_{1} + 3 Λ_{2}$ . Indeed, the $A_{p}$ -peak at $θ = 19.5 \deg$ represents the excitation of a $p$ -polarized SPP wave as a Floquet harmonic of order $n = 7$ by the compound grating because $k_{x}^{(7)} / k_{0} |_{Case 3} = 1.6671$ is close to $Re (1.61782 + 0.00548 i)$ .

Let us note that an $A_{p}$ -peak present in Fig. 8(b) at $θ = 60.6 \deg$ for the simple surface-relief grating with period $Λ_{2}$ is not present in Fig. 3 for the compound surface-relief grating. Furthermore, as was shown for $A_{s}$ -peaks in Sec. 3.2.1, an $A_{p}$ -peak for an individual simple surface-relief grating (cases 1 and 2) is generally higher than the corresponding $A_{p}$ -peak for the compound surface-relief grating (case 3). Thus, although the use of compound surface-relief gratings appears to be efficacious to excite SPP waves, careful selection of the constituent surface-relief gratings is needed for maximal effect.

To recapitulate, out of seven $A_{p}$ -peaks in Fig. 3 that represent the excitation of $p$ -polarized SPP waves, four peaks are due to the simple surface-relief grating with period $Λ_{1}$ , two to the simple surface-relief grating period $Λ_{2}$ alone, and one to the compound surface-relief grating itself. The angular positions of the $A_{p}$ -peaks representing the excitation of $p$ -polarized SPP waves in Fig. 3 are presented in Table 6 are cross-referenced to values of $κ / k_{0}$ obtained from the solution of the canonical boundary-value problem. Correlation of some of those peaks with the $A_{p}$ -peaks in Fig. 8(a) and 8(b), for cases 1 and 2, respectively, can also be deduced from the same table. A comparison of Tables 1 and 6 upholds the conclusions drawn in Sec. 3.2.1 for $s$ -polarized SPP waves: All $p$ -polarized SPP waves predicted by the solution of the canonical boundary-value problem can be excited by the compound surface-relief grating even though either of the individual surface-relief grating alone cannot excite all possible SPP waves. Furthermore, the $A_{p}$ -peaks that are attributable to the simple surface-relief grating with period $Λ_{1}$ ( $Λ_{2}$ ) shift to somewhat lower (higher) angular positions in Fig. 3 in relation to Fig. 8.

Table 6

The relative wavenumerbs κ/k0 of p-polarized SPP waves in the canonical problem (Table 1) and the θ-values of the Ap-peaks in Figs. 8(a), 8(b), and 3 that represent the excitation of these SPP waves in cases 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

$κ / k_{0}$	$θ$
$κ / k_{0}$	Fig. 8(a)	Fig. 8(b)	Fig. 3
$1.36479 + 0.00169 i$	—	20.5 deg	23.5 deg
$1.61782 + 0.00548 i$	12.8 deg	—	12.0
	—	—	19.5 deg
	—	37.2 deg	41.0 deg
$1.87437 + 0.00998 i$	32.3 deg	—	27.6 deg
$1.87437 + 0.00998 i$	—	60.6 deg^*	—
$2.06995 + 0.01526 i$	51.6 deg	—	47.5 deg
$2.21456 + 0.00246 i$	64.8 deg	—	56.3 deg

^*This Ap-peak in case 2 does not have a counterpart peak in case 3.

4. Concluding Remarks

The excitation of multiple SPP waves of the same frequency and the direction of propagation but of different linear polarization states, phase speeds, degrees of localization, and spatial profiles was studied theoretically in the grating-coupled configuration, when the surface-relief grating is compounded from two simpler surface-relief gratings and the partnering dielectric material is a rugate filter. The absorptances for $s$ and $p$ -polarized incident plane waves were calculated as functions of the angle of incidence for two sufficiently high values of the thickness of the partnering dielectric material to rule out waveguide modes and identify SPP waves.

Our numerical results allowed us to draw the following conclusions:

(1) With one fixed compound surface-relief grating, all the SPP waves predicted by the canonical boundary-value problem were excited. The extension of this conclusion to the compounding of two or more simple surface-relief gratings in different configurations requires further investigation.
(2) The excitation of each SPP wave could be attributed to either a simple surface-relief grating present in the compound surface-relief grating or to the compound surface-relief grating itself or to both.
(3) The same SPP wave could be excited by either one or both of the constituting simple gratings of the compound surface-relief grating and/or the compound grating itself.
(4) The angular positions of the absorptance peaks (signifying the excitation of SPP waves) for a simple surface-relief grating shifted somewhat when that grating was made a constituent of a compound surface-relief grating.
(5) Not every absorptance peak (indicative of the excitation of an SPP wave) for a simple surface-relief grating by itself had a counterpart peak for the compound surface-relief grating, but this conclusion does not nullify conclusion (1).

However, the excitation of any specific SPP wave turned out to be less efficient with the compound surface-relief grating than with a simple surface-relief grating. This observation is in agreement with the work of Dolev et al.⁸ for whom the partnering dielectric material was homogeneous.

The foregoing conclusions are expected to be useful in enhancing the quantum efficiency of thin-film solar cells because of the greater possibility of exciting SPP waves of both linear polarization states. For this purpose, the rugate filter will have to be replaced by a multilayered semiconductor material and an easily manufacturable compound surface-relief grating will have to be found to excite all possible SPP waves efficiently over a broad range of visible and infrared frequencies. The introduction of periodic nonhomogeneity in the partnering semiconductor would result in the possibility of guiding multiple SPP waves of both linear polarization states.¹⁴ The possibility of exciting a given SPP wave by either a constituent simple surface-relief grating or the compound surface-relief grating at more than one angles of incidence (combined with the possibility of multiple SPP waves of the same frequency) will increase the energy coupled to SPP waves by the incident light not only in diffuse insolation but also in direct insolation when the solar cell is either unable or not designed to track the sun. The theoretical formulation of RCWA used in this paper for continuously nonhomogeneous partnering dielectric material has been recently extended for periodically multilayered dielectric materials.²⁷

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by Grant No. DMR-1125591 from US National Science Foundation. A.L. is also grateful to Charles Godfrey Binder Endowment at the Pennsylvania State University for partial support of this work.

References

1.

S. A. Maier, Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications, Springer, New York (2007). Google Scholar

2.

Surface Plasmon Resonance Based Sensors, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany (2006). Google Scholar

3.

P. ShengA. N. BlochR. S. Stepleman, “Wavelength-selective absorption enhancement in thin-film solar cells,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 43 (6), 579 –581 (1983). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.94432 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

4.

C. HeineR. H. Morf, “Submicrometer gratings for solar energy applications,” Appl. Opt., 34 (14), 2476 –2482 (1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.002476 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

5.

S. XiaoE. StassenN. A. Mortensen, “Ultrathin silicon solar cells with enhanced photocurrents assisted by plasmonic nanostructures,” J. Nanophoton., 6 (1), 061503 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JNP.6.061503 JNOACQ 1934-2608 Google Scholar

6.

M. A. GreenS. Pillai, “Harnessing plasmonics for solar cells,” Nature Photon., 6 (3), 130 –132 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.30 1749-4885 Google Scholar

7.

H. Raether, Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany (1988). Google Scholar

8.

I. Dolevet al., “Multiple coupling of surface plasmons in quasiperiodic gratings,” Opt. Lett., 36 (9), 1584 –1586 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.36.001584 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

9.

M. FaryadA. Lakhtakia, “On surface plasmon-polariton waves guided by the interface of a metal and a rugate filter with sinusoidal refractive-index profile,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 27 (11), 2218 –2223 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.27.002218 JOBPDE 0740-3224 Google Scholar

10.

M. FaryadA. Lakhtakia, “Grating-coupled excitation of multiple surface-plasmon-polariton waves,” Phys. Rev. A, 84 033852 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.033852 PLRAAN 1050-2947 Google Scholar

11.

J. A. Polo Jr.A. Lakhtakia, “Surface electromagnetic waves: a review,” Laser Photon. Rev., 5 (2), 234 –246 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lpor.v5.2 1863-8880 Google Scholar

12.

A. Lakhtakia, “Surface multiplasmonics,” Proc. SPIE, 8104 810403 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.893129 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

13.

T. G. MackayA. Lakhtakia, “Modeling chiral sculptured thin films as platforms for surface-plasmonic-polaritonic optical sensing,” IEEE Sensors J., 12 (2), 273 –280 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2010.2067448 ISJEAZ 1530-437X Google Scholar

14.

M. FaryadA. Lakhtakia, “Enhanced absorption of light due to multiple surface-plasmon-polariton waves,” Proc. SPIE, 8110 81100F (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.893492 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

15.

B. G. Bovard, “Rugate filter theory: an overview,” Appl. Opt., 32 (28), 5427 –5442 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.32.005427 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

16.

P. W. Baumeister, Optical Coating Technology, SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA (2004). Google Scholar

17.

R. Overendet al., “Rugate filter fabrication using neutral cluster beam deposition,” Vacuum, 43 (1–2), 51 –54 (1992). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-207X(92)90184-X VACUAV 0042-207X Google Scholar

18.

E. Lorenzoet al., “Fabrication and optimization of rugate filters based on porous silicon,” Phys. Status Solidi C, 2 (9), 3227 –3231 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1610-1642 PSSCGL 1610-1634 Google Scholar

19.

C.-C. LeeC.-J. TangJ.-Y. Wu, “Rugate filter made with composite thin films by ion-beam sputtering,” Appl. Opt., 45 (7), 1333 –1337 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.45.001333 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

20.

M. G. MoharamT. K. Gaylord, “Diffraction analysis of dielectric surface-relief gratings,” J. Opt. Soc. Am., 72 (10), 1385 –1392 (1982). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.72.001385 JOSAAH 0030-3941 Google Scholar

21.

L. Li, “Multilayer modal method for diffraction gratings of arbitrary profile, depth, and permittivity,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 10 (12), 2581 –2591 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.10.002581 JOAOD6 0740-3232 Google Scholar

22.

M. G. MoharamE. B. GrannD. A. Pommet, “Formulation for stable and efficient implementation of the rigorous coupled-wave analysis of binary gratings,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 12 (5), 1068 –1076 (1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.12.001068 JOAOD6 0740-3232 Google Scholar

23.

F. WangM. W. HornA. Lakhtakia, “Rigorous electromagnetic modeling of near-field phase-shifting contact lithography,” Microelectron. Eng., 71 (1), 34 –53 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2003.09.003 MIENEF 0167-9317 Google Scholar

24.

N. ChateauJ.-P. Hugonin, “Algorithm for the rigorous coupled-wave analysis of grating diffraction,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 11 (4), 1321 –1331 (1994). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.11.001321 JOAOD6 0740-3232 Google Scholar

25.

N. S. KapanyJ. J. Burke, Optical Waveguides, Academic Press, New York, NY (1972). Google Scholar

26.

D. Marcuse, Theory of Dielectric Optical Waveguides, Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1991). Google Scholar

27.

M. Faryadet al., “Excitation of multiple surface-plasmon-polariton waves guided by the periodically corrugated interface of a metal and a periodic multilayered isotropic dielectric material,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 29 (4), 704 –713 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.29.000704 JOBPDE 0740-3224 Google Scholar

Biography

Muhammad Faryad received his BSc degree in mathematics and physics from University of Punjab, Pakistan, in 2002; MSc and MPhil degrees in electronics from Quaid-i-Azam University, Pakistan in 2006 and 2008, respectively; and PhD degree in engineering science and mechanics from the Pennsylvania State University, in 2012. He is a postdoctoral scholar at the Pennsylvania State University. His research experience includes analysis of high-frequency fields reflected from cylindrical reflectors in an isotropic chiral medium and the fractional curl operator in electromagnetics. Currently, his research interests are surface multiplasmonics, sculptured thin films, and thin-film solar cells.

Akhlesh Lakhtakia received degrees from the Banaras Hindu University (BTech and DSc) and the University of Utah (MS and PhD), in electronics engineering and electrical engineering, respectively. He is the Charles Godfrey Binder (Endowed) professor of Engineering Science and Mechanics at the Pennsylvania State University, and presently serves as the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Nanophotonics. His current research interests include nanotechnology, bioreplication, surface multiplasmonics, complex materials, metamaterials, and sculptured thin films. He is a Fellow of SPIE, Optical Society of America, Institute of Physics (UK), and American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Citation Download Citation

Muhammad Faryad and Akhlesh Lakhtakia "Excitation of multiple surface-plasmon-polariton waves using a compound surface-relief grating," Journal of Nanophotonics 6(1), 061701 (24 September 2012). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JNP.6.061701

Published: 24 September 2012

Access the abstract

JOURNAL ARTICLE
15 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

CITATIONS

Cited by 19 scholarly publications.

Explore citations on Lens.org

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Optical coatings

Dielectrics

Stars

Interfaces

Metals

Optical filters

Wave propagation

Show All Keywords

CHORUS Article. This article was made freely available starting 24 September 2013

1.

Introduction

2.

Boundary-Value Problem