This article [J. Med. Imag. 3(2), 023503 (2016)] was originally published online on 6 May 2016 with a copyeditor error in the abstract. The sentence “The data-model agreement expressed as weighted coefficient of variation () was better than for dead time losses…” has been changed to read: “The data-model agreement expressed as weighted coefficient of variation () was better than for dead time losses…” The value was missing a decimal point. This article was corrected online on 11 May 2016. It appears correctly in print. |
Computed tomography
Optical computing
Photodetectors
Sensors
Spectral models
Medical imaging
Medicine