|
1.IntroductionIn recent years, applications of nano- and micro-particles in biomedicine are expanding. Particles of different materials and sizes have been used to suit a variety of purposes such as diagnosis,1 cancer therapy,2 and drug delivery.3 The methods of utilizing the interaction of a laser and such particles have a precise time- and spatial-controllability and are easy to be applied to catheter-based therapy by using an optical fiber. Several studies have reported the enhancement of cell membrane permeability by utilizing the absorption of laser energy by particles such as carbon black particles and metallic particles. In the method of using a carbon black particle, the enhancement of cell membrane permeability has been demonstrated by the irradiation of a femtosecond (fs) laser, in which the carbon-steam reaction followed by the generation of an acoustic shockwave may have contributed to the enhancement.4 As for the method of using a gold particle, the interaction of gold particles and nanosecond or fs laser pulses has resulted in the enhancement of cell membrane permeability. When irradiating nanosecond laser pulses, temperature rise of gold particles and/or generation of plasma due to the highly enhanced optical near field could result in the formation of a cavitation bubble followed by the generation of shockwave pressure.5–7 In the case of using fs laser pulses, the optical near field around gold particles could yield ablation of cell membrane and bubble formation followed by shockwave pressure generation.8,9 The interaction could be confined in a limited space during the perforation. Baumgart et al. calculated that the spheroidal bubble generated around the 100-nm diameter gold particle by fs laser irradiation (fluence , 45 fs pulse width, and 800-nm wavelength) has a maximal average diameter of around 1.2 μm. The peak pressure of the generated shockwave reaches 80 GPa at the surface of the gold particle, and the maximum pressure drops below 1 GPa as near as 200 nm from the nano particle (NP) center.8 The size of a pore formed on a cell membrane is one of the critical conditions on the laser-based cell perforation. Bhattacharyya et al. estimated the size of a pore formed on a cell membrane to be smaller than 20 nm in diameter when nanosecond laser pulses were irradiated to gold particles of 54 nm in diameter on the cell membrane.10 Several studies on cell selective perforation that utilize gold particles conjugated to the cell membrane by an antigen–antibody reaction have been reported,11,12 although the cytotoxicity of the gold particles is still under discussion.13,14 As an alternative method, cell membrane perforation using biodegradable microspheres has the potential to achieve low-cytotoxic drug delivery.15,16 We have demonstrated the cell membrane perforation by the irradiation of a single shot of weakly focused fs laser to the transparent dielectric microspheres selectively conjugated to the cell membrane.17,18 When the laser is irradiated, an enhanced optical field is generated under the microsphere in the vicinity of the cell membrane, which could lead to the nonlinear interaction. On the study of drug delivery into cells, revealing the parameters critically influencing the delivery realizes a highly efficient delivery as well as the elucidation of the underlying mechanism. For example, it has been demonstrated that the cell membrane fluidity influences cell membrane permeability on the basis of the experiments of changing the ambient temperature when applying electroporation.19 Molecules of different sizes were used to study the mechanism of ultrasound-mediated drug delivery.20 In the present study, we attempted to identify the parameters critically influencing the delivery rate on the biodegradable microsphere-mediated fs laser perforation. The influences of the ambient temperature, the number of irradiated laser pulses, the delivered molecules’ size, and the charge of the molecule on the delivery rate were investigated. The results of changing these parameters would depend little on the cell type and could contribute to the fundamental understanding of the mechanism. 2.Materials and Methods2.1.Cell CultureHuman epithelial carcinoma cells (A431 cells) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum under a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% at 37°C. The cells were harvested and seeded as a monolayer in glass-bottom culture dishes for the experiments. 2.2.Cell Membrane PerforationSpherical protein A bound polylactic acid (PLA) microspheres of 2 μm in diameter were mixed with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor mouse monoclonal antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Fremont, California). The mixture was stirred for 25 min at room temperature, and then the unbound antibody was removed by centrifugation for 10 min at 10,000 rpm. The bound PLA microspheres were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and added to A431 cells. The cells were incubated for 40 min under a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% at 37°C and washed three times with PBS in order to remove the unconjugated microspheres. A Ti:sapphire chirped pulse amplification laser system (Libra, Coherent, Santa Clara, California), which generates 80-fs laser pulses at an 800-nm central wavelength, was used in the experiments. The laser beam was weakly focused by using a plano-convex lens () to a laser spot size of 300 μm which was determined by full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) of the peak intensity of the Gaussian beam. Many cells can be treated simultaneously because a number of cells were inside the laser spot. The cells were irradiated by a single or multiple shot(s) of polarized (linearly or circularly) laser pulse from the top side of the cells. The PLA microsphere works as a microlens, and the optical intensity was enhanced by 9.7 at 870 nm under the PLA microsphere calculated by the three-dimensional finite-difference time-domain method. The optical intensity distribution under the PLA microsphere is described in our previous paper.18 The fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran solution or the green fluorescent silica particle suspension was added to the cells just before the laser irradiation. Two minutes after the irradiation, the cells were washed three times with PBS. Fluorescent molecules delivered into the cells were observed by using a fluorescence microscope (Eclipse Ti-E, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The delivery rate was evaluated by counting the number of cells inside the laser spot, and it was calculated by the number of cells inside the laser spot showing fluorescence divided by the number of cells inside the laser spot. Only the cells attached to the dish were counted. All values in the figures were expressed as . 2.3.Dependence of Delivery Rate on the Ambient TemperatureSimultaneous application of mild heat may influence cell membrane permeabilization when a physical method for drug delivery was applied.19 The effect of cell membrane fluidity on the delivery rate was evaluated by changing the ambient temperature of the cells. After the removal of the unconjugated PLA microspheres from the cells, the culture dish was placed on a thermo plate (Tokai Hit Company, Shizuoka, Japan). The temperature of the medium was controlled by the heating stage and monitored by a thermocouple thermometer. During the perforation experiment, the ambient temperature was kept at 23, 37, or 40.5°C. The FITC-dextran (4 kDa and 2 MDa; Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri) was used to evaluate the efficiency of delivery. The FITC-dextran solution (0.5 mM for 4 kDa and 0.001 mM for 2 MDa) was added to the cells just before the linearly polarized fs laser irradiation. The cells were irradiated by a single shot of fs laser pulse. 2.4.Dependence of Delivery Rate on the Number of Irradiated Laser PulsesThe interaction between a fs laser pulse and cell membrane is governed by the peak laser intensity. Although high peak intensity is necessary for nonlinear optical interactions, excess laser intensity may lead to cell damage. To realize a cell membrane perforation with lower laser intensity, we have conducted an experiment using multiple laser pulses. The FITC-dextran (4 kDa and 2 MDa) and the green fluorescent silica particles (plain or functionalized, 100 nm in diameter) were used to evaluate the efficiency of delivery. They were added to the cells at 23°C just before the circularly polarized fs laser irradiation (1, 2, 5, and 10 pulses). The repetition rate of the laser system was 1 kHz, and the number of shots was controlled by using a digital delay generator (DG535, Stanford Research Systems, Sunnyvale, California) to control the Pockels cell inside the laser system. The laser fluence was 1.06 or at which the corresponding peak laser intensity under the microsphere is estimated to be or , respectively.18 2.5.Dependence of Delivery Rate on the Delivered Particle SizeDifferent sizes of spherical particles were delivered into the cells to investigate and discuss the size of the pores formed on the cell membrane. The green fluorescent silica particles (diameters of 30, 50, 70, 100, 200, and 500 nm) (sicastar, Micromod, Rostock-Warnemünde, Germany) were used to evaluate the size-dependent efficiency of delivery. After the removal of the unconjugated PLA microspheres, the silica particle suspension () was added to the cells at 23°C just before the circularly polarized fs laser irradiation. The laser fluence was . 2.6.Dependence of Delivery Rate on the Charge of Delivered ParticlesSince the cell membrane is negatively charged, the charge of molecules could influence the delivery rate when using physical methods to enhance the cell membrane permeability.21,22 The charged silica particles were delivered into the cells to investigate the influence of the charge on the delivery rate by the biodegradable microsphere-mediated perforation using a fs laser. The green fluorescent silica particles of 100 nm in diameter with functionalized surface were used to evaluate the efficiency of delivery. Aminated or carboxylated particles (sicastar, Micromod) were chosen as they are positively and negatively charged, respectively. After the removal of the unconjugated PLA microspheres from the cells, the silica particle suspension () was added to the cells at 23°C just before the circularly polarized fs laser irradiation. The laser fluence was . 3.Results3.1.Ambient Temperature DependenceFigure 1 shows the dependence of the delivery rate of FITC-dextran on the ambient temperature of the cells. Delivery rates with both 4 kDa and 2 MDa FITC-dextran had no statistically significant difference depending on the temperature. In this experiment, the cells were heated to the specified temperatures before and during the laser irradiation, in which the total heating time was less than 3 min. The 4-kDa FITC-dextran was delivered with higher rates compared with the FITC-dextran of 2 MDa. This result is probably related to the size of the pores formed on the cell membrane, which allowed the smaller FITC-dextran to be delivered and made it difficult for larger FITC-dextran to cross the pores. We have not investigated the effect of the temporal heating dose in this study, but it would affect the survival rate of the cells if the heating time is long. Figure 1 also shows the dependence of the delivery rate on the laser fluence. The delivery rate increased with increasing laser fluence. The peak intensity under the sphere is determined by multiplying the incident laser intensity by the enhancement factor under the PLA sphere. Thus, the figure also indirectly shows the effect of the enhancement factor. 3.2.Dependence the Delivery Rate of FITC-Dextran on the Number of Irradiated PulsesFigure 2 shows the phase-contrast and fluorescence images of the cells after the laser irradiation at the laser fluence of with different numbers of pulses. Cell detachment can be observed in the center of the laser irradiated area when irradiating five or more pulses at , which resulted in difficulties of the evaluation of the delivery rate. We considered that the detached cells are dead and that the laser fluence, which leads to the detachment of the cells, should not be applied to drug delivery system (DDS) applications including in vivo therapy. Several cells near the irradiated area showed fluorescence which is probably due to the low-laser intensity outside the laser spot of the Gaussian beam profile. Figure 3 shows the delivery rate of FITC-dextran with different numbers of pulses at two different laser fluences. The delivery rates for control experiments, i.e., delivery rates without laser irradiation, were and for FITC-dextran of 4 kDa and 2 MDa, respectively. The delivery rate increased with the increasing number of laser pulses. Cells were attached to the bottom of the dish after the irradiation of 10 pulses at . 3.3.Investigation of the Size of Pores on Cell MembraneWe investigated the size of the pores formed on the cell membrane by using different sizes of green fluorescent silica particles. An optical intensity distribution under a PLA microsphere varies depending on the polarization direction of the irradiated laser. In the case of silica substrate surface ablation, the hole fabricated by using dielectric particles had a different shape depending on the polarization of the incident laser.23 As for the perforation of cell membrane, the delivery rate could be influenced by the polarization direction of the irradiated laser (especially for the delivery of silica particles with large diameter) which would form different shapes of pores. Therefore, we have investigated the dependence of the delivery rate on the laser polarization. Figure 4 shows the calculated optical intensity distributions under the PLA microsphere of 2-μm diameter in water irradiated by a plain 800-nm light. The optical intensity distribution of 5-nm under the microsphere and 940-nm under the microsphere, where the peak intensity is obtained, was elliptical (the long axis in the polarized direction) with the -axis linear polarization [Figs. 4(a) and 4(b)] and circular with the circular polarization [Figs. 4(c) and 4(d)]. The FWHM of the optical distribution for linear polarization 940-nm under the microsphere was 610 nm along -axis and 530 nm along -axis, whereas that for circular polarization 940-nm under the microsphere was 570 nm along both - and -axes. However, as shown in Fig. 5, no significant difference in the delivery rate of FITC-dextran was obtained between circular and linear polarizations. Hereafter, we describe results by using circularly polarized laser. Figure 6 shows the dependence of delivery rate on the size of the delivering particles. The green florescent silica particles of different sizes were used in this study. Although the delivery rate had decreased as the diameters of the particles increased, silica particles with 100-nm diameter were able to be delivered into more than 20% of the cells in the laser-irradiated area. 3.4.Delivery of Functionalized Green Fluorescent Silica ParticlesFigure 7 shows the delivery rate of functionalized green fluorescent silica particles. The positively charged particles were able to be delivered at a higher rate than the particles without surface functionalization. 3.5.Dependence of the Delivery Rate of Green Fluorescent Silica Particles on the Number of Irradiated PulsesFigure 8 shows the delivery rate of functionalized green fluorescent silica particles with different number of pulses at the laser fluence of . The delivery rate increased with the increasing number of irradiated pulses and was saturated at five or more pulses. 4.DiscussionSeveral studies have reported the difference in delivery rate of molecules into the cells by changing the temperature around the cells. It is considered that not only the increase in cell membrane fluidity,19,24,25 but also the increase in the diffusion rate of plasmid DNA26 by the temperature rise contribute to the improvement of delivery rate. For the method using gold nanoparticles and picosecond laser for cell membrane perforation, the delivery rate did not depend on the cell membrane fluidity.27 In our study, an experiment was carried out at three different temperatures, but little difference was observed in delivery rate as shown in Fig. 1. The diffusion rate of the FITC-dextran and the fluidity of the cell membrane were probably changed by the temperature, but the temperature is not the influencing parameter on the delivery rate in the biodegradable microsphere-mediated cell perforation. Several studies have reported that the number of laser pulses affect the delivery rate on the laser-based perforation. When irradiating a focused laser directly to the cell membrane, the increase in the number of pulses improves the delivery rate.28 In the case of using a nanosecond laser with gold particles conjugated to the cell membrane, the delivery was reported to be saturated or decreased for more than five pulses, probably due to the melting and/or fragmentation of the particles.12,29 If the laser fluence is under the threshold of melting or fragmentation of the particles, the delivery rate could continue to increase even after irradiating with 800 pulses.10 As shown in Fig. 8, when delivering silica particles of 100 nm in diameter with multiple pulses, the delivery rate was saturated when irradiating five or more pulses. In addition to the possibility of fragmentation of the PLA microspheres, microspheres were possibly unconjugated from the cell membrane, and resulted in the less interaction between the enhanced optical field and the cell membrane. By investigating the size of the molecules that can be delivered into cells, we can discuss the size of the pores formed on the cell membrane. In the method of using ultrasound, a large number of pores in the sizes ranging from 20 to 100 nm were observed, which resulted in the delivery of 10 kDa to 2 MDa FITC-dextran.20 The different sizes of latex particles30 and quantum dots10 were used for the estimation of the pore sizes. Recently, therapeutic proteins of 15 to 150 kDa have been delivered to cells by using electroporation.31,32 With the conditions we used in the present study, FITC-dextran of 4 kDa and 2 MDa (1.4 and 27 nm in Stokes’ radius, respectively) and silica particles of 100 nm in diameter have been delivered. The result indicated that the pore sizes are large enough for the delivery of therapeutic agents into the cells. The complex composed of positively charged cationized gelatin and plasmid DNA was used for transfection, a delivery of nucleic acid into the cells, under ultrasound irradiation.21,22 The positively charged complex is considered to be adhered to the negatively charged cell membrane, and then they may be uptaken into cells. With a subsequent irradiation of ultrasound, cells exhibited a significantly enhanced luciferase activity in contrast to the cationized gelatin alone with or without ultrasound and ultrasound irradiation alone. For the method of using gold nanoparticles and picosecond laser for cell membrane perforation, FITC-dextran with a larger molecular weight had shown much lower fluorescence than FITC-dextran with a smaller molecular weight, which could be due to the increase in the charge.27 In our method, an improvement in delivery rate was realized by using positively charged silica particles. The positively charged particles were able to be delivered with a higher rate than the particles without surface functionalization. Since the particles were added to the cells just before the laser irradiation and the time until they were washed out by PBS was approximately 5 min, it is highly probable that there was little uptake of silica particles by the cells before laser irradiation. Therefore, the higher concentration of positively charged silica particles near the pores contributed to the improvement of the delivery rate. The delivery rate shown in this study was not as high as that of other methods after lasting improvements.9,11 Further improvement of the delivery rate would probably be achieved by optimizing the types of antibody and the time for antigen–antibody reaction depending on cell types which would increase the number of PLA spheres conjugated to the cell membrane. 5.ConclusionIn this study, parameters critically influencing the delivery rate on the biodegradable microsphere-mediated fs laser perforation were investigated. Irradiation of multiple pulses had improved the efficiency even at low-laser fluence. The delivery rate depends on the particles’ size. Silica particles of 100 nm in diameter were able to be delivered into 20% of the irradiated cells, suggesting that the pore sizes are large enough for the delivery of therapeutic agents into the cells. The particles’ charge influenced the delivery rate, and a more efficient delivery was realized by using the positively charged particles. These findings contribute to the development of an efficient and safe phototherapy and drug delivery. AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. 23680058 [Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A)]. ReferencesY.-H. Wanget al.,
“Photoacoustic/ultrasound dual-modality contrast agent and its application to thermotherapy,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 17
(4), 045001
(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.4.045001 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
L. Guet al.,
“Magnetic-field-assisted photothermal therapy of cancer cells using Fe-doped carbon nanoparticles,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 17
(1), 018003
(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.1.018003 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
Y. Jiaet al.,
“Co-encapsulation of magnetic nanoparticles and doxorubicin into biodegradable PLGA nanocarriers for intratumoral drug delivery,”
Int. J. Nanomed., 7 1697
–1708
(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S28629 IJNNHQ 1178-2013 Google Scholar
P. Chakravartyet al.,
“Delivery of molecules into cells using carbon nanoparticles activated by femtosecond laser pulses,”
Nat. Nanotechnol., 5
(8), 607
–611
(2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.126 1748-3387 Google Scholar
C. M. Pitsillideset al.,
“Selective cell targeting with light-absorbing microparticles and nanoparticles,”
Biophys. J., 84
(6), 4023
–4032
(2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75128-5 BIOJAU 0006-3495 Google Scholar
B. St-Louis Lalondeet al.,
“Visible and near infrared resonance plasmonic enhanced nanosecond laser optoporation of cancer cells,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 4
(4), 490
–499
(2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.4.000490 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar
S. Peeterset al.,
“Mechanisms of nanoparticle-mediated photomechanical cell damage,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 3
(3), 435
–446
(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.000435 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar
E. BoulaisR. LachaineM. Meunier,
“Plasma mediated off-resonance plasmonic enhanced ultrafast laser-induced nanocavitation,”
Nano Lett., 12
(9), 4763
–4769
(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl302200w NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar
J. Baumgartet al.,
“Off-resonance plasmonic enhanced femtosecond laser optoporation and transfection of cancer cells,”
Biomaterials, 33
(7), 2345
–2350
(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.062 BIMADU 0142-9612 Google Scholar
K. BhattacharyyaS. MehtaJ. Viator,
“Optically absorbing nanoparticle mediated cell membrane permeabilization,”
Opt. Lett., 37
(21), 4474
–4476
(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.37.004474 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
E. Y. Lukianova-Hlebet al.,
“Cell-specific transmembrane injection of molecular cargo with gold nanoparticle-generated transient plasmonic nanobubbles,”
Biomaterials, 33
(21), 5441
–5450
(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.077 BIMADU 0142-9612 Google Scholar
C. Yaoet al.,
“Elevation of plasma membrane permeability by laser irradiation of selectively bound nanoparticles,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 10
(6), 064012
(2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.2137321 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
Y. Panet al.,
“Size-dependent cytotoxicity of gold nanoparticles,”
Small, 3
(11), 1941
–1949
(2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1613-6829 1613-6829 Google Scholar
S. Abdelhamidet al.,
“Laser-induced modifications of gold nanoparticles and their cytotoxic effect,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 17
(6), 068001
(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.6.068001 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
J. Nicolaset al.,
“Design, functionalization strategies and biomedical applications of targeted biodegradable/biocompatible polymer-based nanocarriers for drug delivery,”
Chem. Soc. Rev., 42
(3), 1147
–1235
(2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35265f CSRVBR 0306-0012 Google Scholar
B. D. UleryL. S. NairC. T. Laurencin,
“Biomedical applications of biodegradable polymers,”
J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys., 49
(12), 832
–864
(2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/polb.22259 JPBPEM 0887-6266 Google Scholar
M. TerakawaY. Tanaka,
“Dielectric microsphere mediated transfection using a femtosecond laser,”
Opt. Lett., 36
(15), 2877
–2879
(2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.36.002877 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
M. TerakawaY. TsunoiT. Mitsuhashi,
“In vitro perforation of human epithelial carcinoma cell with antibody-conjugated biodegradable microspheres illuminated by a single 80 femtosecond near-infrared laser pulse,”
Int. J. Nanomed., 7 2653
–2660
(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN IJNNHQ 1178-2013 Google Scholar
M. KandušerM. ŠentjurcD. Miklavčič,
“The temperature effect during pulse application on cell membrane fluidity and permeabilization,”
Bioelectrochemistry, 74
(1), 52
–57
(2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2008.04.012 BEBEBP 0302-4598 Google Scholar
R. Karshafianet al.,
“Ultrasound-induced uptake of different size markers in mammalian cells,”
in IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium,
1
–16
(2005). Google Scholar
H. Hosseinkhaniet al.,
“In vitro transfection of plasmid DNA by amine derivatives of gelatin accompanied with ultrasound irradiation,”
Pharm. Res., 19
(10), 1471
–1479
(2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020400514990 PHREEB 0724-8741 Google Scholar
H. Hosseinkhaniet al.,
“Ultrasound enhancement of in vitro transfection of plasmid DNA by a cationized gelatin,”
J. Drug Targeting, 10
(3), 193
–204
(2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10611860290022624 JDTAEH 1061-186X Google Scholar
T. SakaiN. NedyalkovM. Obara,
“Friction characteristics of submicrometre-structured surfaces fabricated by particle-assisted near-field enhancement with femtosecond laser,”
J. Phys. D, 40
(23), 7485
–7491
(2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/40/23/035 JPAPBE 0022-3727 Google Scholar
M. Terakawaet al.,
“Gene transfer into mammalian cells by use of a nanosecond pulsed laser-induced stress wave,”
Opt. Lett., 29
(11), 1227
–1229
(2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.29.001227 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
M. Terakawaet al.,
“In vitro gene transfer to mammalian cells by the use of laser-induced stress waves: effects of stress wave parameters, ambient temperature, and cell type,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 11
(1), 014026
(2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.2160407 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
V. G. ZarnitsynM. R. Prausnitz,
“Physical parameters influencing optimization of ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection,”
Ultrasound Med. Biol., 30
(4), 527
–538
(2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.01.008 USMBA3 0301-5629 Google Scholar
S. Kalieset al.,
“Enhancement of extracellular molecule uptake in plasmonic laser perforation,”
J. Biophotonics,
(2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201300056 JBOIBX 1864-063X Google Scholar
A. P. Rudhallet al.,
“Exploring the ultrashort pulse laser parameter space for membrane permeabilisation in mammalian cells,”
Sci. Rep., 2 858
(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep00858 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar
C. Yaoet al.,
“Influence of laser parameters on nanoparticle-induced membrane permeabilization,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 14
(5), 054034
(2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3253320 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
V. Oberleet al.,
“Efficient transfer of chromosome-based DNA constructs into mammalian cells,”
Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 1676
(3), 223
–230
(2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbaexp.2003.12.003 BBACAQ 0006-3002 Google Scholar
E. Eksioglu-Demiralpaet al.,
“A method for functional evaluation of caspase activation pathways in intact lymphoid cells using electroporation-mediated protein delivery and flow cytometric analysis,”
J. Immunol. Methods, 275
(1–2), 41
–56
(2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1759(02)00554-9 JIMMBG 0022-1759 Google Scholar
R. Todorova,
“Estimation of methods of protein delivery into mammalian cells—a comparative study by electroporation and bioporter assay,”
Appl. Biochem. Microbiol., 45
(4), 444
–448
(2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0003683809040176 APBMAC 0003-6838 Google Scholar
BiographyTatsuki Mitsuhashi received his BS degree in engineering from the Keio University in 2012. Currently, he is a graduate student in the School of Integrated Design Engineering, Keio University. His research interests include laser-based nanomedicine, laser-cell perforation, drug delivery, and minimally invasive laser therapeutic technology. Mitsuhiro Terakawa received his BS, MS, and PhD degrees in engineering from Keio University in 2003, 2005, and 2007, respectively. In 2007, he joined the Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, as a research fellow. Currently, he is an assistant professor in the Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering at Keio University. His research interests include laser processing, plasmonic nanofabrication, and minimally invasive laser therapeutic technology. |