Self-seeded free-electron lasers with orbital angular momentum

Jiawei Yan; Gianluca Geloni

doi:10.1117/1.APN.2.3.036001

30 March 2023 Self-seeded free-electron lasers with orbital angular momentum

Jiawei Yan, Gianluca Geloni

Author Affiliations +

Advanced Photonics Nexus, Vol. 2, Issue 3, 036001 (March 2023). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.APN.2.3.036001

Abstract

X-ray beams carrying orbital angular momentum (OAM) are an emerging tool for probing matter. Optical elements, such as spiral phase plates and zone plates, have been widely used to generate OAM light. However, due to the high impinging intensities, these optics are challenging to use at X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs). Here, we propose a self-seeded free-electron laser (FEL) method to produce intense X-ray vortices. Unlike passive filtering after amplification, an optical element will be used to introduce the helical phase to the radiation pulse in the linear regime, significantly reducing thermal load on the optical element. The generated OAM pulse is then used as a seed and significantly amplified. Theoretical analysis and numerical simulations demonstrate that the power of the OAM seed pulse can be amplified by more than two orders of magnitude, reaching peak powers of several tens of gigawatts. The proposed method paves the way for high-power and high-repetition-rate OAM pulses of XFEL light.

1. Introduction

Structured light could provide new perspectives on numerous physical phenomena. In particular, optical vortices carrying orbital angular momentum (OAM),¹ characterized by a helical phase-front $\exp (i l ϕ)$ , where $ϕ$ is the azimuthal coordinate and $l$ is the topological charge, are intensively studied. OAM light at visible and infrared wavelengths has been used in a wide range of fields.²^–⁷ In the short wavelength range, optical vortices are promising means to trigger new phenomena through light–matter interaction.⁸^–¹⁰ X-ray beams carrying OAM have been proposed for research in quadrupolar X-ray dichroism experiments,¹¹ photoionization experiments,¹² resonant inelastic X-ray scattering,¹³ and magnetic helicoidal dichroism.¹⁴^,¹⁵ Most recently, a new type of phase dichroism has been demonstrated to probe the real-space configuration of the antiferromagnetic ground state with X-ray beams carrying OAM.¹⁶ Moreover, the hard X-ray helical dichroism of disordered molecular media has been demonstrated.¹⁷ At present, X-ray OAM light is provided by synchrotron radiation facilities. The generation of high-intensity X-ray OAM beams by X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs) could open new possibilities for studies requiring well-defined spatial intensity and phase variations.

Modern XFELs deliver high-brightness pulses with durations spanning from tens of femtoseconds down to the attosecond range, enabling new research in a variety of scientific fields.¹⁸^,¹⁹ The majority of XFEL facilities worldwide²⁰^–²⁴ employ the mechanism of self-amplified spontaneous emission (SASE).²⁵ The SASE process starts from the initial electron-beam shot noise and allows operation over a wide spectral range, reaching sub-angstrom wavelengths. Self-seeding schemes²⁶^,²⁷ are used at several facilities to enhance the temporal coherence of free-electron laser (FEL) pulses while increasing their spectral density. However, the transverse radiation profile of FELs operating at saturation is restricted to the fundamental FEL mode, which can usually be approximated by a Gaussian mode with no azimuthal phase dependence.

The generation of OAM light at XFELs can be realized by using helical undulators or forming electron bunches with helical shapes. In the first case, the harmonic radiation in helical undulators has long been theoretically shown to carry a helical phase,²⁸^–³⁰ but which was experimentally demonstrated only recently.³¹^–³³ However, the intensity of the harmonic emission is much weaker than that of the fundamental.²⁹ In order to deal with this issue, harmonic interaction between a seed laser and an electron beam in a helical undulator³⁴^,³⁵ was further proposed to generate OAM radiation at the fundamental wavelength. In addition, schemes to generate OAM radiation by using an external seed laser with a proper transverse phase structure to form the electron bunches into a helical pattern³⁶^,³⁷ have been proposed. However, these methods are limited by the availability of external seed lasers, or by the harmonic conversion number, especially at the shortest wavelengths. Also, a transverse-mode selection method using Bragg reflectors and longitudinal transverse-mode coupling³⁸ has been proposed, but it requires an XFEL oscillator configuration.

A more straightforward approach to generate X-ray OAM light is to employ optical elements, such as spiral phase plates (SPPs),³⁹^,⁴⁰ spiral Fresnel zone plates (SZPs),⁴¹^,⁴² and other diffractive optics⁴³ behind an undulator. In recent years, these optical elements have been well developed and have been experimentally demonstrated to produce soft and hard X-ray OAM light at synchrotron light sources. The design of an SPP typically features a rotating step with increasing thickness in the azimuthal direction. As the light beam passes through the SPP, it collects an azimuthally varying phase, transforming it into a beam with a helical phase.⁴⁴ Recently, SPPs made from fused silica⁴⁰ have been successfully used to shape synchrotron radiation at photon energies of 8.2 keV, and are considered for potential use at XFELs. In addition, the SZP is a unique class of diffractive optics that not only imparts a spiral phase to the incoming beam but also exhibits focusing properties. SZPs with silicon membranes have been successfully used at an FEL in the extreme-ultraviolet wavelength range with an efficiency of 17% and a pulse energy of around $10 μ J$ .³³ However, for obtaining X-ray OAM radiation with high pulse energies, the efficiency and thermal loading of these optics can constitute a significant challenge, especially considering the development of high-repetition-rate XFELs based on superconducting accelerators.

In this work, we propose a new scheme to generate intense X-ray vortices that is free from the previous issues. The method is based on the widely used SASE mode of operation and does not require helical undulators or external seed laser systems; thus it can in principle be applied to all existing XFEL user facilities with minimal hardware additions, especially when in synergy with self-seeding setups.

2. Principles and Methods

The schematic layout of the proposed method, referred to as self-seeded FEL with OAM (SSOAM), is shown in Fig. 1. Several undulator segments are employed as the first stage to generate an SASE FEL pulse in the linear regime. Then, an optical element, such as an SPP or SZP, is used to imprint the helical phase of a low-order OAM mode onto the FEL beam, generating an OAM seed pulse. Finally, the OAM seed pulse is significantly amplified in the second-stage undulator. A small magnetic chicane located between the first stage and the second stage is needed to detour the electron bunch, removing the microbunching introduced in the first stage, and resulting in a small delay below ten femtoseconds between the OAM seed and the electron bunch. Therefore, a relatively long electron bunch is requested in this scheme to ensure the amplification of the OAM seed in the second stage. In addition, fresh slice⁴⁵ or twin bunch operation⁴⁶ can also be employed to obtain better performance. The drift section between the first stage and the optical element can be increased to make the transverse size of the FEL pulses hitting the optics larger, which further reduces the impinging intensity and therefore minimizes heat-loading effects. In this case, utilizing an SZP or additional focusing optics may be necessary before entering the second stage.

Fig. 1

Schematic layout of the self-seeded FEL with OAM.

Previous theoretical analyses indicated that an OAM seed can be amplified by the FEL process.⁴⁷^,⁴⁸ In the SSOAM scheme, however, the SASE pulse filtered by the optical element is not a pure OAM pulse. We can theoretically analyze how FEL modes evolve in this scheme. First, we expand the slowly varying envelope of the electric field in the frequency domain into a Fourier series in the azimuthal angle $ϕ$ according to Ref. 49,

Eq. (1)

\tilde{E} (z, r, ϕ) = \sum_{n = - \infty}^{\infty} {\tilde{E}}^{(n)} (z, r) \exp (- i n ϕ),

Where

z

and

r

are the longitudinal and transverse coordinates with respect to the undulator axis.

- n

indicates the topological charge. Each of the azimuthal harmonics is then decomposed into “self-reproducing” modes,

Eq. (2)

{\tilde{E}}^{(n)} (\hat{z}, \hat{r}) = \sum_{j} a_{j}^{(n)} Φ_{n j} (\hat{r}) \exp (λ_{j}^{(n)} \hat{z}),

with

\hat{r} = r / r_{0}

and

\hat{z} = Γ z

.

\hat{r}

and

\hat{z}

are normalized versions of

r

and

z

according to the definition in Ref. 49, where

Γ

is the gain parameter.

λ_{j}^{(n)}

and

Φ_{n j} (\hat{r})

are eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the guiding modes, respectively. Assuming no changes in the transverse profile and typical dimension

r_{0}

of the electron beam, and the same gain parameter during the entire process, the normalization parameters will remain constant during all the steps, and the FEL eigenmodes obey the eigenvalue equation ⁴⁹,

Eq. (3)

[Δ_{n} + g (\hat{r}, λ_{j}^{(n)})] Φ_{n j} (\hat{r}) + 2 i B λ_{j}^{(n)} Φ_{n j} (\hat{r}) = 0,

where we recognize that

Eq. (4)

Δ_{n} \equiv [\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial {\hat{r}}^{2}} + \frac{1}{\hat{r}} \frac{\partial}{\partial \hat{r}} - \frac{n^{2}}{{\hat{r}}^{2}}],

is the Bessel differential operator. Here,

g

is a function of

\hat{r}

and

λ_{j}^{(n)}

defined in Ref. 49 and

B = r_{0}^{2} Γ ω / c

.

Instead, during free-space propagation, the azimuthal harmonics of the electric field do not evolve in self-reproducing modes. Since

Eq. (5)

[\nabla^{2} + \frac{2 i ω}{c} \frac{\partial}{\partial z}] \tilde{E} = 0,

after expansion in azimuthal harmonics, we have

Eq. (6)

[Δ_{n} + 2 i B \frac{\partial}{\partial \hat{z}}] Φ_{n j} (\hat{r}, \hat{z}) = 0 .

In the first stage, we have a first azimuthal series of FEL modes $Φ_{n j}^{(I)}$ satisfying Eq. (3). The modes evolve in free space before filtering. For simplicity, here we assume that filtering happens directly at the exit of the first undulator. The filtering amounts to a change in the phase. A phase of $\exp (i l ϕ)$ is introduced to the radiation field, which is a reasonable assumption when using a finely stepped phase plate. We can therefore write the filtered self-reproducing modes as $Φ_{n - l, j}^{(I b)} (\hat{r}) = Φ_{n j}^{(I)}$ .

The modes $Φ_{n - l, j}^{(I b)}$ need now to be propagated in free space for a distance $δ \hat{z}$ . We call with $Φ_{n - l, j}^{(I c)} (\hat{z}, \hat{r})$ the free-space propagated version of $Φ_{n - l, j}^{(I b)}$ , which obeys

Eq. (7)

[Δ_{n - l} + 2 i B \frac{\partial}{\partial \hat{z}}] Φ_{n - l, j}^{(I c)} (\hat{r}, \hat{z}) = 0 .

Solving this equation for a propagation distance $δ \hat{z}$ , we obtain

Eq. (8)

Φ_{n - l, j}^{(I c)} (\hat{r}, δ \hat{z}) = \frac{i B}{2 π δ \hat{z}} \int_{0}^{\infty} d {\hat{r}}^{'} {\hat{r}}^{'} \int_{0}^{2 π} d δ ϕ^{'} \exp {\frac{i B}{2 δ \hat{z}} [{\hat{r}}^{2} - 2 \hat{r} {\hat{r}}^{'} \cos (δ ϕ^{'}) + {\hat{r}}^{' 2}]} \times Φ_{n j}^{(I)} ({\hat{r}}^{'}) \exp [- i (n - l) δ ϕ^{'}] .

Performing first the integral over the phase, we find

Eq. (9)

Φ_{n - l, j}^{(I c)} (\hat{r}, δ \hat{z}) = \frac{i^{n - l + 1} B}{δ \hat{z}} \exp (\frac{i B {\hat{r}}^{2}}{2 δ \hat{z}}) \int_{0}^{\infty} d {\hat{r}}^{'} {\hat{r}}^{'} \exp (\frac{i B {\hat{r}}^{'}^{2}}{2 δ \hat{z}}) Φ_{n j}^{(I)} ({\hat{r}}^{'}) J_{n - l} (- \frac{\hat{r} {\hat{r}}^{'} B}{δ \hat{z}}) .

To summarize, the field at the entrance of the second stage amounts to

Eq. (10)

\tilde{E} (\hat{r}, ϕ) = \sum_{n = - \infty}^{\infty} \sum_{j} a_{j}^{(n)} \exp (λ_{j}^{(n)} {\hat{z}}_{1}) Φ_{n - l, j}^{(I c)} (\hat{r}) \exp [- i (n - l) ϕ],

where

{\hat{z}}_{1}

indicates the normalized position in the first stage. One may approximate

j = 1

as fixed because we assume good mode selection in the first stage. Then, the contribution to the field at the entrance of the second stage can be approximated to

Eq. (11)

\tilde{E} (\hat{r}, ϕ) = \sum_{n = - \infty}^{\infty} a_{1}^{(n)} \exp (λ_{1}^{(n)} {\hat{z}}_{1}) Φ_{n - l, 1}^{(I c)} (\hat{r}) \exp [- i (n - l) ϕ] \equiv \sum_{n = - \infty}^{\infty} A^{(n)} Φ_{n - l, 1}^{(I c)} (\hat{r}) \exp [- i (n - l) ϕ] .

All the contributions for all values of $n$ will enter the second stage with a topological charge $h = - (n - l)$ .

Now, the FEL eigenmodes in the second stage obey

Eq. (12)

[Δ_{m} + g (\hat{r}, λ_{k}^{(I I, m)})] Φ_{m, k}^{(I I)} (\hat{r}) + 2 i B λ_{k}^{(I I, m)} Φ_{m, k}^{(I I)} (\hat{r}) = 0,

and we can decompose

Eq. (13)

Φ_{n - l, 1}^{(I c)} (\hat{r}, δ \hat{z}) = \sum_{k} α_{k} Φ_{n - l, k}^{(I I)} .

Since the orbital momentum should be conserved, each of the components $Φ_{n - l, k}^{(I I)}$ carries a fraction of the total OAM with topological charge $- (n - l)$ . Each mode will be amplified at different rates for different values of $k$ . Assuming good mode selection, the mode for $k = 1$ will be dominant for the topological charge $- (n - l)$ . However, all the FEL modes with fixed $- (n - l)$ and different $k$ will contribute to an OAM field distribution with the same topological charge given as

Eq. (14)

{\tilde{E}}^{(n - l)} (\hat{r}, ϕ) = A^{(n)} \sum_{k} α_{k} Φ_{n - l, k}^{(I I)} \exp [- i (n - l) ϕ] \exp (λ_{k}^{(I I, n - l)} {\hat{z}}_{2}),

where

{\hat{z}}_{2}

indicates the normalized position in the second stage. In this sense, these modes will not be in competition. The competition will come from modes with different topological charges.

The contribution for $n = 0$ corresponds to the fundamental FEL mode and will be dominant in the first stage. As a result, the seed pulse in the second stage is mainly composed of the $h = l$ mode. In particular, the component of the $h = 0$ mode of the seed pulse is transformed from the $- l$ mode in the first stage. Therefore, it is important for the proposed method to properly optimize the undulator settings of both stages to ensure a good amplification of the $h = l$ mode at the second stage.

3. Results

To further illustrate the proposed scheme, a detailed example based on the parameters of European XFEL²³ is studied with GENESIS⁵⁰ simulations. A 14 GeV electron beam with a normalized emittance of 0.5 mm.mrad, a bunch length of 20 fs, and a current flattop profile of 5000 A is assumed here to produce nine keV FEL pulses. The electron beam is sent to the first stage and generates SASE pulses with energies of a few microjoules or less. Then, an SPP is used to impart a helical phase of $\exp (i ϕ)$ , corresponding to $l = 1$ , on the SASE pulse. We assume the intensity of the pulse is unchanged by the SPP. The distance between the SPP and both undulator sections is set to 2 m. For simplicity, the SASE pulse interacts with a fresh electron beam with an unchanged bunch length in the second stage.

As indicated by the theoretical analysis, the $h = 0$ mode of the SASE pulse is transformed to the $h = 1$ OAM mode while the the $h = - 1$ mode is transformed to the $h = 0$ mode after the filtering. Therefore, the resonance and taper of the first stage undulator need to be optimized to achieve the largest possible ratio of the $h = 0$ mode while keeping the pulse energy small. Meanwhile, the undulator of the second stage needs to be optimized to achieve the strongest possible amplification of the $h = 1$ mode.

In the simulation, nine undulator segments with a length of 5 m and a 40 mm period are employed as the first stage. The optimization of the first-stage undulator suggests a slight reverse taper with $Δ K / K = - 0.18 %$ . In this case, an SASE pulse with a pulse energy of $9.58 μ J$ is obtained at the end of the first stage. The mode decomposition of the pulse shows that the relative weight of the $h = 0$ , $h = - 1$ , and $h = 1$ modes are 91%, 3%, and 3%, respectively. The temporal power profile and transverse profile of the pulse are shown in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), respectively. The FEL pulse is then propagated sequentially through the free-space section, the SPP, and the second free-space section, before being amplified as a seed in the second stage. As shown in Figs. 2(c) and 2(d), the seed pulse mainly consists of the $h = 1$ mode, with a ratio of 91%. The ratio of the $h = 0$ mode of the seed pulse is 3%.

Fig. 2

Temporal power of the FEL pulse at (a) the end of the first stage and (c) the entrance of the second stage decomposed into OAM modes. The corresponding transverse profiles of the pulse at these two positions are shown in (b) and (d), respectively.

The OAM seed pulse is amplified in the second stage, which consists of seven undulator segments. To ensure optimal gain for the $h = 1$ mode, the undulator taper is optimized to a strength of $Δ K / K = - 0.06 %$ . The gain curves of pulse and different OAM modes are shown in Fig. 3. The pulse energy reaches $430.17 μ J$ at the end of the undulator. The modes $h = 0$ and $h = 2$ , which transform from $h = - 1$ and $h = 1$ in the first stage, respectively, have similar initial components in the second stage but grow at very different rates. At the exit of the second stage, the $h = 1$ mode is amplified 43.5-fold and approaches saturation. The ratio of the $h = 1$ mode is first increased to 95% and then slowly decreased to 88%. The ratio of the $h = 0$ mode reaches 9% at the end of the second stage. Figures 4(a) and 4(b) show the transverse profiles of the pulse at the exit of the fifth undulator cell, where the pulse energy is $184.44 μ J$ and the ratio of the $h = 1$ mode is 93%, and the end of the seventh cell, respectively. Figure 4(c) presents the transverse phase distribution at the position in the pulse with a peak power of 92 GW, located at $1.58 μ m$ in Fig. 4(d).

Fig. 3

Gain curves of different OAM modes along the second stage.

Fig. 4

Transverse profile of the FEL pulse at the end of (a) the fifth cell and (b) the second stage. (c) Transverse phase distribution at the position of maximum power in the pulse. (d) Temporal power profile of the pulse at the end of the second stage.

Figure 5(a) presents the variation of the different OAM modes contained in the FEL pulse at the exit of the fifth undulator cell of the second stage as the total phase shift, i.e. $2 π l$ , imprinted by the SPP changes. The results show that the proposed scheme can tolerate relatively large phase shift variations due to imperfections in optical element fabrication or changes in photon energy. With the introduction of phase shifts from $1.7 π$ to $2.4 π$ , corresponding to $l = 0.85$ to $l = 1.2$ , pulses with $h = 1$ mode ratio exceeding 80% can be obtained. Moreover, the results also indicate that the proposed method can be used to effectively amplify the $h = 2$ mode. FEL pulses with 84% of $h = 2$ mode and pulse energy of $52 μ J$ can be obtained when the introduced phase shift is $4 π$ . High-order OAM modes with topological charge larger than 2 cannot be well amplified due to stronger diffraction.³⁶^,⁴⁷

Fig. 5

(a) Variation of the different OAM modes with the change of the imprinted total phase shift. (b) Gain curves of different OAM modes at the second stage starting from a weaker seed pulse.

To simulate the effects of a weaker seed power, we assume that the use of an optical element still introduces $\exp (i ϕ)$ into the SASE pulse but with an efficiency of only 10%, while the undulator settings remain unchanged. In comparison to Fig. 2(c), the pulse energy of this seed pulse is reduced to $0.96 μ J$ . As shown in Fig. 5(b), the $h = 1$ mode can be amplified 107-fold in the second stage even if it starts with a much weaker seed pulse. At the exit of the seventh undulator cell, the pulse energy reaches $107.16 μ J$ , where the ratios of the $h = 1$ and $h = 0$ modes are 87% and 9%, respectively. The FEL pulse can be further amplified to $307.94 μ J$ when nine undulator cells are employed. In this case, the ratios of the $h = 1$ and $h = 0$ modes are 78% and 17%, respectively.

4. Conclusion

We proposed a scheme to produce high-intensity short-wavelength vortices. Theoretical analysis and simulations demonstrate that the introduction of an OAM mode to an FEL beam using an optical element leads to changes in multiple transverse modes of the FEL beam, where the dominant OAM mode can be amplified by more than two orders of magnitude. Since the SSOAM scheme is based on the SASE operation, it can be enabled in a wide range of wavelengths, including extreme ultraviolet, soft, and hard X-rays. In combination with the self-seeding scheme, introducing OAM to a weak and monochromatic seed pulse and further amplifying it, narrow bandwidth X-ray vortices can be generated. The proposed method paves the way for the realization of high-power and high-repetition-rate X-ray vortices and promises to open up new ways for probing matter with such light, such as time-resolved twisted X-ray diffraction techniques.⁵¹

Acknowledgments

We thank Serguei Molodtsov, Svitozar Serkez, Weilun Qin, and Tianyun Long for useful discussions and for their interest in this work.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

1.

L. Allen et al., “Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of laguerre-gaussian laser modes,” Phys. Rev. A, 45 (11), 8185 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.45.8185 (1992). Google Scholar

2.

Y. Shen et al., “Optical vortices 30 years on: OAM manipulation from topological charge to multiple singularities,” Light: Sci. Appl., 8 (1), 1 –29 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-019-0194-2 (2019). Google Scholar

3.

H. He et al., “Direct observation of transfer of angular momentum to absorptive particles from a laser beam with a phase singularity,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 75 (5), 826 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.826 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (1995). Google Scholar

4.

D. G. Grier, “A revolution in optical manipulation,” Nature, 424 (6950), 810 –816 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01935 (2003). Google Scholar

5.

A. Sit et al., “High-dimensional intracity quantum cryptography with structured photons,” Optica, 4 (9), 1006 –1010 https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.001006 (2017). Google Scholar

6.

D.-S. Ding et al., “Quantum storage of orbital angular momentum entanglement in an atomic ensemble,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 114 (5), 050502 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.050502 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2015). Google Scholar

7.

S. Fürhapter et al., “Spiral phase contrast imaging in microscopy,” Opt. Express, 13 (3), 689 –694 https://doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.13.000689 OPEXFF 1094-4087 (2005). Google Scholar

8.

A. Picón et al., “Transferring orbital and spin angular momenta of light to atoms,” New J. Phys., 12 (8), 083053 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/083053 NJOPFM 1367-2630 (2010). Google Scholar

9.

G. De Ninno et al., “Photoelectric effect with a twist,” Nat. Photonics, 14 (9), 554 –558 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-0669-y NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2020). Google Scholar

10.

I. P. Ivanov, “Promises and challenges of high-energy vortex states collisions,” Progr. Particle Nucl. Phys., 127 103987 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103987 (2022). Google Scholar

11.

M. van Veenendaal and I. McNulty, “Prediction of strong dichroism induced by x rays carrying orbital momentum,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 98 (15), 157401 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.157401 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2007). Google Scholar

12.

A. Picón et al., “Photoionization with orbital angular momentum beams,” Opt. Express, 18 (4), 3660 –3671 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.003660 OPEXFF 1094-4087 (2010). Google Scholar

13.

A. S. Rury, “Examining resonant inelastic spontaneous scattering of classical Laguerre-Gauss beams from molecules,” Phys. Rev. A, 87 (4), 043408 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.043408 (2013). Google Scholar

14.

M. Fanciulli et al., “Electromagnetic theory of helicoidal dichroism in reflection from magnetic structures,” Phys. Rev. A, 103 (1), 013501 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.013501 (2021). Google Scholar

15.

M. Fanciulli et al., “Observation of magnetic helicoidal dichroism with extreme ultraviolet light vortices,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 128 (7), 077401 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.077401 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2022). Google Scholar

16.

M. R. McCarter et al., “Antiferromagnetic real-space configuration probed by x-ray orbital angular momentum phase dichroism,” (2022). Google Scholar

17.

J. R. Rouxel et al., “Hard x-ray helical dichroism of disordered molecular media,” Nat. Photonics, 16 570 –574 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-022-01022-x NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2022). Google Scholar

18.

C. Pellegrini, A. Marinelli and S. Reiche, “The physics of x-ray free-electron lasers,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 88 (1), 015006 https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015006 RMPHAT 0034-6861 (2016). Google Scholar

19.

N. Huang et al., “Features and futures of x-ray free-electron lasers,” Innovation, 2 (2), 100097 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100097 (2021). Google Scholar

20.

P. Emma et al., “First lasing and operation of an Ångstrom-wavelength free-electron laser,” Nat. Photonics, 4 (9), 641 –647 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010.176 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2010). Google Scholar

21.

D. Pile, “X-rays: first light from SACLA,” Nat. Photonics, 5 (8), 456 –457 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2011.178 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2011). Google Scholar

22.

H.-S. Kang et al., “Hard x-ray free-electron laser with femtosecond-scale timing jitter,” Nat. Photonics, 11 (11), 708 –713 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-017-0029-8 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2017). Google Scholar

23.

W. Decking et al., “A MHz-repetition-rate hard x-ray free-electron laser driven by a superconducting linear accelerator,” Nat. Photonics, 14 391 –397 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-0607-z NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2020). Google Scholar

24.

E. Prat et al., “A compact and cost-effective hard x-ray free-electron laser driven by a high-brightness and low-energy electron beam,” Nat. Photonics, 14 (12), 748 –754 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-00712-8 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2020). Google Scholar

25.

A. Kondratenko and E. Saldin, “Generating of coherent radiation by a relativistic electron beam in an ondulator,” Part. Accel., 10 207 –216 PLACBD 0031-2460 (1980). Google Scholar

26.

J. Feldhaus et al., “Possible application of x-ray optical elements for reducing the spectral bandwidth of an x-ray SASE FEL,” Opt. Commun., 140 (4–6), 341 –352 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4018(97)00163-6 OPCOB8 0030-4018 (1997). Google Scholar

27.

G. Geloni, V. Kocharyan and E. Saldin, “A novel self-seeding scheme for hard x-ray FELs,” J. Mod. Opt., 58 (16), 1391 –1403 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2011.586473 JMOPEW 0950-0340 (2011). Google Scholar

28.

W. Colson, “The nonlinear wave equation for higher harmonics in free-electron lasers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 17 (8), 1417 –1427 https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.1981.1071273 IEJQA7 0018-9197 (1981). Google Scholar

29.

G. Geloni et al., “Theory of nonlinear harmonic generation in free-electron lasers with helical wigglers,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sec. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip., 581 (3), 856 –865 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.08.152 (2007). Google Scholar

30.

E. Hemsing, “Coherent photons with angular momentum in a helical afterburner,” Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 23 (2), 020703 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.23.020703 PRABFM 1098-4402 (2020). Google Scholar

31.

J. Bahrdt et al., “First observation of photons carrying orbital angular momentum in undulator radiation,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 111 (3), 034801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.034801 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2013). Google Scholar

32.

E. Hemsing et al., “First characterization of coherent optical vortices from harmonic undulator radiation,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 113 (13), 134803 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.134803 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2014). Google Scholar

33.

P. R. Ribič et al., “Extreme-ultraviolet vortices from a free-electron laser,” Phys. Rev. X, 7 (3), 031036 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031036 PRXHAE 2160-3308 (2017). Google Scholar

34.

E. Hemsing, A. Marinelli and J. Rosenzweig, “Generating optical orbital angular momentum in a high-gain free-electron laser at the first harmonic,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 106 (16), 164803 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.164803 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2011). Google Scholar

35.

E. Hemsing et al., “Coherent optical vortices from relativistic electron beams,” Nat. Phys., 9 (9), 549 –553 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2712 NPAHAX 1745-2473 (2013). Google Scholar

36.

E. Hemsing and A. Marinelli, “Echo-enabled x-ray vortex generation,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 109 (22), 224801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.224801 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2012). Google Scholar

37.

P. R. Ribič, D. Gauthier and G. De Ninno, “Generation of coherent extreme-ultraviolet radiation carrying orbital angular momentum,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 112 (20), 203602 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.203602 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2014). Google Scholar

38.

N. Huang and H. Deng, “Generating x-rays with orbital angular momentum in a free-electron laser oscillator,” Optica, 8 (7), 1020 –1023 https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.428341 (2021). Google Scholar

39.

A. G. Peele et al., “Observation of an x-ray vortex,” Opt. Lett., 27 (20), 1752 –1754 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.27.001752 OPLEDP 0146-9592 (2002). Google Scholar

40.

F. Seiboth et al., “Refractive hard x-ray vortex phase plates,” Opt. Lett., 44 (18), 4622 –4625 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.44.004622 OPLEDP 0146-9592 (2019). Google Scholar

41.

A. Sakdinawat and Y. Liu, “Soft-x-ray microscopy using spiral zone plates,” Opt. Lett., 32 (18), 2635 –2637 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.32.002635 OPLEDP 0146-9592 (2007). Google Scholar

42.

J. Vila-Comamala, A. Sakdinawat and M. Guizar-Sicairos, “Characterization of x-ray phase vortices by ptychographic coherent diffractive imaging,” Opt. Lett., 39 (18), 5281 –5284 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.005281 OPLEDP 0146-9592 (2014). Google Scholar

43.

J. T. Lee et al., “Laguerre–Gauss and Hermite–Gauss soft x-ray states generated using diffractive optics,” Nat. Photonics, 13 (3), 205 –209 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0328-8 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2019). Google Scholar

44.

R. Chen et al., “Orbital angular momentum waves: generation, detection, and emerging applications,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., 22 (2), 840 –868 https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2019.2952453 (2019). Google Scholar

45.

A. A. Lutman et al., “Fresh-slice multicolour x-ray free-electron lasers,” Nat. Photonics, 10 (11), 745 –750 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.201 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2016). Google Scholar

46.

A. Marinelli et al., “High-intensity double-pulse x-ray free-electron laser,” Nat. Commun., 6 (1), 1 –6 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7369 NCAOBW 2041-1723 (2015). Google Scholar

47.

E. Hemsing et al., “Longitudinal dispersion of orbital angular momentum modes in high-gain free-electron lasers,” Phys. Rev. Spl. Top.-Accel. Beams, 11 (7), 070704 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.11.070704 (2008). Google Scholar

48.

E. Hemsing, A. Gover and J. Rosenzweig, “Virtual dielectric waveguide mode description of a high-gain free-electron laser. ii. modeling and numerical simulations,” Phys. Rev. A, 77 (6), 063831 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.77.063831 (2008). Google Scholar

49.

E. Saldin, E. Schneidmiller and M. Yurkov, “Diffraction effects in the self-amplified spontaneous emission fel,” Opt. Commun., 186 (1–3), 185 –209 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4018(00)01061-0 OPCOB8 0030-4018 (2000). Google Scholar

50.

S. Reiche, “Genesis 1.3: a fully 3D time-dependent FEL simulation code,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip., 429 (1–3), 243 –248 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00114-X (1999). Google Scholar

51.

H. Yong et al., “Direct monitoring of conical intersection passage via electronic coherences in twisted x-ray diffraction,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 129 (10), 103001 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.103001 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2022). Google Scholar

Biography

Jiawei Yan is a physicist at the European XFEL. He received his PhD from the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2021. His current research interests include free-electron laser physics, accelerator physics, and machine learning. His research work was awarded as one of China’s Top 10 Optical Breakthroughs (2021). He won the Excellent Doctoral Dissertation Award from the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Young Investigator FEL Prize.

Gianluca Geloni is a physicist at the European XFEL. His interests are at the interface between electron accelerators and radiation generation by ultrarelativistic beams. He studied at Università di Genova (Italy) and he received his doctorate in physics from the Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (The Netherlands) in 2003. He spent the following years working at DESY, HASYLAB (Germany), and in 2010 he joined the European XFEL (Germany), where he became leader of the FEL Physics group and co-coordinator of the FEL R&D group. He currently focuses his research activity on the inception, assessment, and development of advanced FEL schemes.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE and CLP under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.

Citation Download Citation

Jiawei Yan and Gianluca Geloni "Self-seeded free-electron lasers with orbital angular momentum," Advanced Photonics Nexus 2(3), 036001 (30 March 2023). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.APN.2.3.036001

Received: 28 December 2022; Accepted: 28 February 2023; Published: 30 March 2023

Access the abstract

JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

CITATIONS

Cited by 8 scholarly publications.

Explore citations on Lens.org

KEYWORDS

Free electron lasers

Spiral phase plates

X-rays

Optical components

Angular momentum

Tunable filters

Optical filters

1.

Introduction

2.

Principles and Methods