|
SummaryA ray of p-polarized light in air is incident at θt on the one side surface of a right-angle prism with refractive index n1, as shown in Fig. 1. The light ray is refracted into the prism and it propagates toward the base surface of the prism. At the base surface of the prism, there is a boundary between the prism and the tested material of refractive index n2 where n1 > n2. If θi is larger than the critical angle, the light is totally reflected at the boundary. According to Fresnel equations[1], we have where n=n2/n1, and the phase-variation ϕp can be written as It is obvious from Eq. (1) that n2 can be calculated with the measurement of ϕp under the experimental conditions in which θi and n1 are specified. The schematic diagram of this method is shown in Fig. 2. For convenience, the +z-axis is chosen to be along the light propagation direction and the y-axis is along the direction perpendicular to the paper plane. A light coming from a laser light source passes though a polarizer P. If the transmission axis of P is located at 0° with relative to the x-axis, then the light becomes the p-polarized light. A spatial filter S and a lens L collimate the light. The collimating light is incident on a beam splitter BS and divided into two parts: the transmitted light and the reflected light. The reflected light is normally reflected by a mirror M1driven a piezo-transducer PZT and passes through the BS. Then it enters a CCD camera. Here it acts as the reference light in the interferometer. On the other hand, the transmitted light is reflected by the mirrors M2 and M3, and enters a right-angle prism. After it is totally reflected at the boundary between the prism and the tested material, it propagates out of the prism. Then, it is normally reflected by a mirror M4 and comes back along the original path. It reflected by the BS and enters a CCD camera. It acts as the test light in the interferometer. The Jones vectors[2] of the reference light and the test light can be written as and respectively, where ai, and ϕi(i= t or r) represent the amplitude and the phase. The intensity measured by the CCD is where A(x,y) and B(x,y) are the intensity coefficients, ϕp is the phase variation of the p-polarized light owning to the total internal reflection in the prism, and Ψ is the phase difference due to the optical path difference and reflections at BS and mirrors. In order to obtain the distribution of the two-dimensional phase ϕ(x,y), four interferograms[3] are taken by a CCD as the PZT moves M1 to change the phase of the reference light. The phase π/2 is added between two successive interferograms. So the intensities of these four interferograms can be written as where ψi= 0, π/2, π, 3π/2 as i=1, 2, 3, 4, respectively. By solving these simultaneous equations, we can obtain Substituting Eq. (6) into Eq. (4), we have In the second measurement let the base surface of the prism free without any test material. We obtain where the phase variation ϕa can be calculated with the refractive index of a prism n2 and n1= 1. Substituting ϕa and ϕ’ into the Eq. (8), the data of ψ can be calculated. Then substituting the data of ψ into Eq. (7), ϕp(x,y) can be estimated. Finally, the two-dimensional distribution of refractive index of a tested material n2(x,y) can be evaluated by using Eq. (1b) In order to show the feasibility of this method, we tested a mixed liquid with ricinus oil, olive oil, baby oil, and water. The refractive indices of three oils and water are 1.513, 1.474, 1.463, and 1.33, respectively. A He-Ne laser with a 632.8 nm wavelength and a right-angle prism made of SF8 glass with refractive index n2= 1.689, were used in this test. The incident angle θi was chosen as 69.74°. A 8-bits CCD camera (TM-545, PULNiX Inc.) with 510×492 pixels, a PZT (P-830.10, PI Inc.), a phase shifter card (DT331, DT Inc.), a frame grabber card (Meteor-II/Standard, Matrox Inc.), and the analysis software IntelliWaveTM (Engineering Synthesis Design Inc.) were used to drive M1 and to process interferogram analysis[4,5]. The two-dimensional phase variation distribution and the associated two-dimensional refractive index distribution of the tested material are shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4.This method has some merits such as simple optical setup, easy operation and repid measurement. Its validity has been demonstrated. AcknowledgmentsThis study was supported in part by the National Science Council, Taiwan, ROC, under contract NSC 94-2215-E-009-002. ReferencesB. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics, Wiley, New York
(1991). https://doi.org/10.1002/0471213748 Google Scholar
A. Yariv and P. Yeh,
“Optical waves in crystals,”
John Wiley and Sons, N. Y.
(1984). Google Scholar
D. Malacara,
“Optical shop testing,”
I & II John Wiley and Sons, N. Y.
(1992). Google Scholar
K. J. Gasvik,
“Optical Metrology,”
3rdJohn Wiley and Sons, N. Y.
(2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/0470855606 Google Scholar
P. Hariharan,
“Optical interferometery,”
2ndAcademic Press,2003). Google Scholar
|