Slope sensitivities for optical surfaces

John R. Rogers

doi:10.1117/12.2186707

3 September 2015 Slope sensitivities for optical surfaces

John R. Rogers

Proceedings Volume 9582, Optical System Alignment, Tolerancing, and Verification IX; 958206 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2186707
Event: SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications, 2015, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

Setting a tolerance for the slope errors of an optical surface (e.g., surface form errors of the “mid-spatial-frequencies”) requires some knowledge of how those surface errors affect the final image of the system. While excellent tools exist for simulating those effects on a surface-by-surface basis, considerable insight may be gained by examining, for each surface, a simple sensitivity parameter that relates the slope error on the surface to the ray displacement at the final image plane. Snell’s law gives a relationship between the slope errors of a surface and the angular deviations of the rays emerging from the surface. For a singlet or thin doublet acting by itself, these angular deviations are related to ray deviations at the image plane by the focal length of the lens. However, for optical surfaces inside an optical system having a substantial axial extent, the focal length of the system is not the correct multiplier, as the sensitivity is influenced by the optical surfaces that follow. In this paper, a simple expression is derived that relates the slope errors at an arbitrary optical surface to the ray deviation at the image plane. This expression is experimentally verified by comparison to a real-ray perturbation analysis. The sensitivity parameter relates the RMS slope errors to the RMS spot radius, and also relates the peak slope error to the 100% spot radius, and may be used to create an RSS error budget for slope error. Application to various types of system are shown and discussed.

Citation Download Citation

John R. Rogers "Slope sensitivities for optical surfaces", Proc. SPIE 9582, Optical System Alignment, Tolerancing, and Verification IX, 958206 (3 September 2015); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2186707

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
9 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Tolerancing

Received signal strength

Refraction

Laser beam diagnostics

Mirrors

Optical simulations

Reticles

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years