Paper
13 March 2009 Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) versus full field digital mammography (FFDM): comparison of a system performance using a contrast detail phantom
A. Nitrosi, G. Borasi, M. Bertolini, A. Botti, D. Tassoni, S. Strocchi
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 7258, Medical Imaging 2009: Physics of Medical Imaging; 725831 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.811026
Event: SPIE Medical Imaging, 2009, Lake Buena Vista (Orlando Area), Florida, United States
Abstract
To evaluate performance (image signal to noise ratio) of a digital mammographic system working in 2D planar versus tomosynthesis modality, a contrast detail phantom was developed embedding 1 cm plexyglas, including 49 holes of different diameter and depth, between two layers containing a breast simulating material. The acquisition protocol included 15 low dose projections (reconstructed 1mm-thick slices) and a 2D view. Using an automatic software analysis tool, the signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR) was evaluated. SDNR in the DBT images was about a factor two higher than with FFDM (P<1E-4). A more complete visual detection experiment is underway.
© (2009) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
A. Nitrosi, G. Borasi, M. Bertolini, A. Botti, D. Tassoni, and S. Strocchi "Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) versus full field digital mammography (FFDM): comparison of a system performance using a contrast detail phantom", Proc. SPIE 7258, Medical Imaging 2009: Physics of Medical Imaging, 725831 (13 March 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.811026
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 2 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Digital breast tomosynthesis

Digital mammography

Signal to noise ratio

Breast

Sensors

Image analysis

Interference (communication)

Back to Top