Comparison of different beam diameter definitions to characterize thermal damage of the eye

Karl Schulmeister; Reinhard Gilber; Florian Edthofer; Bernhard Seiser; Georg Vees

doi:10.1117/12.649233

23 February 2006 Comparison of different beam diameter definitions to characterize thermal damage of the eye

Karl Schulmeister, Reinhard Gilber, Florian Edthofer, Bernhard Seiser, Georg Vees

Proceedings Volume 6101, Laser Beam Control and Applications; 61011A (2006) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.649233
Event: Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering, 2006, San Jose, California, United States

Abstract

To assign a diameter to a beam profile which does not feature an actual perimeter presents a formidable problem. Traditionally, different beam diameter criteria are used which, however, depending on the beam profile, may yield drastically different results. The second moment method has been standardised by ISO, however, it also has some limitations. While a certain diameter criterion may have advantageous properties for instance for describing the propagating beam, it may not be appropriate for other 'applications' such as scaling the thermal damage threshold or for calculating the power that passes through an aperture. We discuss the latter two on the basis of some example profiles which show that the second moment diameter is in these cases not an appropriate parameter. For laser safety, where the exposure limit for the eye (MPE) is stated as a function of what could be referred to as the 'thermal beam diameter', a diameter criterion is needed that yields a correct value for this parameter for any arbitrary size and shape of the beam profile at the retina. A procedure is proposed that can be applied to determine a 'thermal damage parameter' for a given beam profile. This procedure is checked against thermal model calculations of the damage threshold. It is also shown that the power that passes through an aperture (such as the pupil of the eye) can be seriously underestimated when using the second moment diameter for non-Gaussian beams.

Citation Download Citation

Karl Schulmeister, Reinhard Gilber, Florian Edthofer, Bernhard Seiser, and Georg Vees "Comparison of different beam diameter definitions to characterize thermal damage of the eye", Proc. SPIE 6101, Laser Beam Control and Applications, 61011A (23 February 2006); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.649233

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available