Paper
25 October 2004 Packet marking function of active queue management mechanism: should it be linear, concave, or convex?
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Recently, several gateway-based congestion control mechanisms have been proposed to support the end-to-end congestion control mechanism of TCP (Transmission Control Protocol). In this paper, we focus on RED (Random Early Detection), which is a promising gateway-based congestion control mechanism. RED randomly drops an arriving packet with a probability proportional to its average queue length (i.e., the number of packets in the buffer). However, it is still unclear whether the packet marking function of RED is optimal or not. In this paper, we investigate what type of packet marking function, which determines the packet marking probability from the average queue length, is suitable from the viewpoint of both steady state and transient state performances. Presenting several numerical examples, we investigate the advantages and disadvantages of three packet marking functions: linear, concave, and convex. We show that, although the average queue length in the steady state becomes larger, use of a concave function improves the transient behavior of RED and also realizes robustness against network status changes such as variation in the number of active TCP connections.
© (2004) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Hiroyuki Ohsaki and Masayuki Murata "Packet marking function of active queue management mechanism: should it be linear, concave, or convex?", Proc. SPIE 5598, Performance, Quality of Service, and Control of Next-Generation Communication Networks II, (25 October 2004); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.571797
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Control systems

Telecommunications

Beryllium

Information science

Information technology

Ordinary differential equations

Performance modeling

RELATED CONTENT


Back to Top