Paper
23 December 2002 Comparison of reconstruction algorithms for images from sparse-aperture systems
James R. Fienup, Douglas K. Griffith, L. Harrington, A. M. Kowalczyk, Jason J. Miller, James A. Mooney
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Telescopes and imaging interferometers with sparsely filled apertures can be lighter weight and less expensive than conventional filled-aperture telescopes. However, their greatly reduced MTF’s cause significant blurring and loss of contrast in the collected imagery. Image reconstruction algorithms can correct the blurring completely when the signal-to-noise (SNR) is high, but only partially when the SNR is low. This paper compares both linear (Wiener) and nonlinear (iterative maximum likelihood) algorithms for image reconstruction under a variety of circumstances. These include high and low SNR, Gaussian noise and Poisson-noise dominated, and a variety of aperture configurations and degrees of sparsity. The quality metric employed to compare algorithms is image utility as quantified by the National Imagery Interpretability Rating Scale (NIIRS). On balance, a linear reconstruction algorithm with a power-law power-spectrum estimate performed best.
© (2002) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
James R. Fienup, Douglas K. Griffith, L. Harrington, A. M. Kowalczyk, Jason J. Miller, and James A. Mooney "Comparison of reconstruction algorithms for images from sparse-aperture systems", Proc. SPIE 4792, Image Reconstruction from Incomplete Data II, (23 December 2002); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.452396
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 41 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Signal to noise ratio

Filtering (signal processing)

Reconstruction algorithms

Telescopes

Air contamination

Space telescopes

Detection and tracking algorithms

Back to Top