Paper
1 April 1997 Comparison of ML parameter estimation and neural network classifier for texture classification
Reena Singh, Ramon E. Vasquez, Rajeev Singh
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
The ML parameter estimation and the neural network based methods for classifying the textures are compared in this paper. The comparison is based on the correct classification percentage. Certain constraints have been imposed on the classifiers which are using the same sample size, same number of features and same number of training and test feature vectors for both the classifiers. The classifiers use the energy of the dominant channels of a tree-structured wavelet transform as features. Experiments are performed with textures from the Brodatz album. All the textured images are of size 256 by 256 pixels with 256 gray levels. Selection of best feature set has been arrived at using the 'leave one out' approach. The results indicate that both the classifiers give comparable performance. However, the governing factors for their choice are the number of training samples, number of features, and the computational complexity for both the classifiers, and the size of the network, in specific, for the neural network.
© (1997) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Reena Singh, Ramon E. Vasquez, and Rajeev Singh "Comparison of ML parameter estimation and neural network classifier for texture classification", Proc. SPIE 3030, Applications of Artificial Neural Networks in Image Processing II, (1 April 1997); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.269767
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Neural networks

Wavelets

Image classification

Wavelet transforms

Linear filtering

Statistical analysis

Evolutionary algorithms

Back to Top