Paper
25 November 1996 Low-power coherent and noncoherent light in clinical practice
Ciprian Antipa, Mihail-Lucian Pascu, Viorica Stanciulescu, Claudia Mayerzedt, Mihaela Vlaiculescu
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
In order to find out the comparative clinical effects of coherent and noncoherent low power light, we divided 74 patients with sciatics in three groups, treated with the same energy dose, as follows: A group: with IR continuous diode laser; B group: with noncoherent IR diode; C group: with placebo laser. The positive results were 66.66 percent for A group, 52.00 percent for B group and 36.36 percent for C group. We conclude, after these preliminary results, that coherent low power light has superior clinical efficacy versus noncoherent light and placebo laser, when used the same energy dose.
© (1996) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Ciprian Antipa, Mihail-Lucian Pascu, Viorica Stanciulescu, Claudia Mayerzedt, and Mihaela Vlaiculescu "Low-power coherent and noncoherent light in clinical practice", Proc. SPIE 2929, Effects of Low-Power Light on Biological Systems II, (25 November 1996); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.260001
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 4 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Semiconductor lasers

Diodes

Infrared lasers

Laser therapeutics

Light emitting diodes

Beam controllers

Curium

Back to Top