Paper
29 July 1993 Comparative evaluation of pattern recognition techniques for detection of microcalcifications
Kevin S. Woods, Jeffrey L. Solka, Carey E. Priebe, Chris C. Doss, Kevin W. Bowyer, Laurence P. Clarke
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 1905, Biomedical Image Processing and Biomedical Visualization; (1993) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.148696
Event: IS&T/SPIE's Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology, 1993, San Jose, CA, United States
Abstract
Computer detection of microcalcifications in mammographic images will likely require a multi-stage algorithm that includes segmentation of possible microcalcifications, pattern recognition techniques to classify the segmented objects, a method to determine if a cluster of calcifications exists, and possibly a method to determine the probability of malignancy. This paper will focus on the classification of segmented objects as being either (1) microcalcifications or (2) non-microcalcifications. Six classifiers (2 Bayesian, 2 dynamic neural networks, a standard backpropagation network, and a K-nearest neighbor) are compared. Methods of segmentation and feature selection are described, although they are not the primary concern of this paper. A database of digitized film mammograms is used for training and testing. Detection accuracy is compared across the six methods.
© (1993) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Kevin S. Woods, Jeffrey L. Solka, Carey E. Priebe, Chris C. Doss, Kevin W. Bowyer, and Laurence P. Clarke "Comparative evaluation of pattern recognition techniques for detection of microcalcifications", Proc. SPIE 1905, Biomedical Image Processing and Biomedical Visualization, (29 July 1993); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.148696
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 25 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Image segmentation

Error analysis

Mammography

Image classification

Pattern recognition

Neural networks

Data acquisition

Back to Top