Systematic and stochastic placement error divergence between low and high-NA EUV lithography

Anatoly Burov; Roel Gronheid; Alessandro Vaglio Pret

doi:10.1117/12.2687702

21 November 2023 Systematic and stochastic placement error divergence between low and high-NA EUV lithography

Anatoly Burov, Roel Gronheid, Alessandro Vaglio Pret

Proceedings Volume 12750, International Conference on Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography 2023; 1275007 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2687702
Event: SPIE Photomask Technology + EUV Lithography, 2023, Monterey, California, United States

Abstract

Pattern placement error has historically been related to overlay in DUV lithography, where continuum approximations, transmissive masks, and telecentric stepper/scanners are used. EUV lithography does not enjoy such properties: stochastic phenomena – both optical and chemical – strongly affect the printed pattern even at relatively relaxed k1 factors, while non-telecentric optical paths complicate across-focus as well as across-slit pattern behavior. Both randomness and optical non-idealities contribute to unpredictable and uncorrectable feature edge misplacement as stochastic and systematic pattern placement errors, which must be taken into consideration in the overlay budget. For low-NA (NA = 0.33) EUV lithography, stochastic and systematic pattern misplacement are controlled by printing very relaxed pitches, often greater than 34 nm, which correspond to a k₁ > 0.4 (in ArFi lithography production lines run at pitches ≈ 80 nm, where k1 < 0.3). This allows for the optimization of the mask and source to control the edge placement across focus and slit. Moreover, sacrificing some throughput keeps the printed features large enough to receive enough photons to preserve the stochastic phenomena under a controllable level. In high-NA (NA = 0.55) EUV lithography arrival angles are larger – up to 33° – and simulations show that this has dire consequences for pattern placement control. Moreover, high-NA EUV lithography is expected to enter production for the 14A node, with a line/space minimum pitch of 17-19 nm (k₁ ≈ 0.37) where the edge placement error budget will be further reduced. We compare the overall pattern placement control of a well-established low-NA exposure configuration for lines/spaces at a pitch of 36 nm (k₁ = 0.44) with different high-NA solutions to print 22 nm (k₁ = 0.45) lines/spaces.

Conference Presentation

(2023) Published by SPIE. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.

Citation Download Citation

Anatoly Burov, Roel Gronheid, and Alessandro Vaglio Pret "Systematic and stochastic placement error divergence between low and high-NA EUV lithography", Proc. SPIE 12750, International Conference on Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography 2023, 1275007 (21 November 2023); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2687702

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available