Open Access Presentation + Paper
11 June 2021 Improvement of molecular adhesion for spatial applications at Thales SESO over the past 20 years
Natacha Cocheteau, Christian Du Jeu, Alizee Loarer, Patrick Robert, Mailys Thorigny
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 11852, International Conference on Space Optics — ICSO 2020; 118521N (2021) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2599287
Event: International Conference on Space Optics — ICSO 2021, 2021, Online Only
Abstract
Molecular adhesion is a well-known process used on terrestrial optics and other fields. This process consists in joining two surfaces without the use of any adhesive or additional material. Molecular adhesion is a high-precision production process, and assemblies obtained present a dimensional stability due to the absence of mechanical part or glue. In addition, since no adhesive materials are used in this process, the risks of contamination associated with degassing are avoided. Based on this benefits, this process is of particular interest for optical system manufacturing for spatial applications. For over the past 20 years, Thales SESO develop its own process of molecular adhesion. For example among others, it has been applied on the manufacturing of Fabry-Perot interferometers. Such as fused silica Fabry-Perot for ALADIN program in the frame of AEOLUS mission (launched in August 2018) or fused silica/Zerodur® Fabry-Perot for ATLID program. Both interferometer have under vacuum cavity. On the ATLID Fabry-Perot the sealing is also made using molecular adhesion. Back then, the molecular adhesion mechanical strength admissible was around 1 MPa. Then, Thales SESO improve its molecular adhesion process - through lots of collaborations with CNES and other partners – in order to be able to bond more complex designs and increase the mechanical resistance. Today the molecular adhesion mechanical strength admissible has been multiplied by a factor five. Those improvement have been applied in the frame of the Third Generation Meteorological satellite (MTG-IRS) for the manufacturing of corner cubes in accordance with the mechanical and thermal environments of a geostationary orbit coupled with very strict optical performances. Today, several corner cubes have been manufactured, and the strength of adhered bond have been demonstrated in terms of thermal, shock and random solicitations through mechanical qualifications. The major advantage of molecular adhesion for the corner cube application is the stability of the WFE under vacuum – which have been also demonstrated. Here, an overview of the Thales SESO realizations starting from Fabry-Perot first results to the latest results on corner cubes performances as well as the future of molecular adhesion for space applications imagined by Thales SESO.
Conference Presentation

1.

INTRODUCTION

Also known as “direct bonding”, “optical bonding”, “optical contacting” or “wafer bonding”, molecular adhesion is a well-known process and consists in joining two surfaces without any use of any adhesive or additional materials. Two solids with well-polished flat surfaces are brought into close proximity, they locally attract to each other by Van der Waals or hydrogen bonds and adhere or bond [1,2]. The main applications of this adherence process are on microelectronics devices and optics.

The basic phenomenon involved in molecular adhesion has been known and used for many centuries. Around 1230, the importance of surface cleaning during gold contacting has been noticed. The first discussion about solid adhesion seems to be related to an hypothetical experiment proposed by Galilee : if two surfaces perfectly flat and polished of glass or metal are brought into contact, they bond each other. Galilee affirms that this phenomenon is impossible in the case of rough surfaces. Moreover, the importance of polishing in adherence has been demonstrated by Desagulier in 1734. This phenomenon has been few used until mid-1980 where it appears in microelectronics and the SOI (Silicon-On-Insulator) manufacturing.

In the optical field, the first patent concerning molecular adhesion dates from 1920 and has been deposed by W.E. Williams on two interferometers : a Fabry Perot and a Michelson interferometer with blades made using molecular adhesion. More recently, Philips patented in 1962 this technology on a He-Ne laser with mirrors positioned at each extremity of the cavity and fixed using molecular adhesion.

The process is also applied in optical workshop to allow reaching accurate angles and flatness, by adhering the part to be manufactured onto a reference block

Nowadays, this process is used in microelectronics on silicon-on-insulators devices, silicon based sensor and actuators, etc…[3]. In Optics, it is used in the manufacturing of complexes optical systems, to create assemblies (interferometers, slicers…). One example is the manufacturing slicers for the Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer for the Very Large Telescope [4].

Molecular adhesion is a high-precision production process, and obtained assemblies present a dimensional stability due to the absence of mechanical part or glue. In addition, since no adhesive materials are used in this process, the risks of contamination associated with degassing are avoided. Several materials can be adhered (fused silica, silicon, silicon carbide, zerodur®, some metals, etc) and adherences can be used under cryogenic environment. Based on these benefits, this process is of particular interest for optical system manufacturing for spatial applications where involved constraints (thermal fatigue, accelerations, vibrations) are very different from those encountered on Earth.

This paper will first present how molecular adhesion works. Then, an overview of the Thales SESO realizations from terrestrial applications to space applications will be made explaining how - starting from simple realizations - the process has been improved to be spatially qualified and applied on lightweighted hollow corner cubes performances fully adhered.

2.

MODLECULAR DHESION: PRINCIPLE OF THE PROCESS

Molecular adhesion consists in joining two surfaces without any use of any adhesive or additional materials. Direct bonding is possible as long as the two surfaces have similar geometries and requires clean surfaces free of contaminants [5, 6]. Therefore, first steps of the adhesion process consist in physical and chemical preparation of surfaces:

  • - Several polishing of both surfaces to adhere were manually performed in order to obtain the exact surface roughness (here, roughness is always less than 1 nm RMS), flatness and deflection required. Indeed, a high level of roughness results in a weak contact zone and thus in the occurrence of defects during the bonding process. When the roughness is too great, bonding becomes impossible [7, 8].

  • - Then, surfaces undergo a chemical treatment in order to eliminate any contaminating particles [9]. With ambient humidity, free silicon surfaces are recovered by silanol (Si-OH) groups which are the precursor of the bonding [10 - 12]. With this chemical treatment, the more silanol groups possible on both surfaces is seek. On figure 2-1, one component of the roughness is represented, each line represents a bonding site, and obviously a lack of bonding sites causes incomplete bonding.

Figure 2-1.

Behaviors of surfaces during room temperature bonding according to their hydroxylated rate [13]

00002_PSISDG11852_118521N_page_3_1.jpg

Once physical preparation and surface treatment has been completed, surfaces are covers with clusters of water molecules due to ambient humidity. Then, surfaces are brought into contact and bonding occurs between water’ clusters present on the two surfaces. By applying a slight local pressure, the surfaces are brought closer together, and hydrogen bonds developed between molecules of water present at the interface and the two surfaces. A bonding wave propagates from the contact point through the whole sample, resulting in the bonding of the surfaces. Molecules of water migrate from the bonding interface and/or diffuse at the interface, bringing the surfaces even closer together and initiating silanol-silanol covalent bonds [14-17]. Figure 2-2 shows the evolution of bonds during adherence starting from hydrogen bonds between clusters of water to covalent bonds for permanent sealing.

Figure 2-2.

Evolution of bonds during molecular adherence process [17]

00002_PSISDG11852_118521N_page_4_1.jpg

3.

MORE THAN 20 YEARS OF MOLECULAR ADHESION AT THALES SESO

This is a commonly use process in optics. Indeed, it is used to maintain pieces on a support for precision polishing as shown in figure 3-1, for example:

  • To polish a thin piece with high precision without inducing deformation

  • To polish angles with precision

Figure 3-1.

Example of adhered pieces for precision polishing

00002_PSISDG11852_118521N_page_4_2.jpg

Obviously, for this kind of application, the adherence doesn’t need to be too resistant as surfaces need to be separated after the manufacturing. However, by knowing precisely bonds involved in adherence the process can be optimized for weak adhesion.

With years, Thales SESO improved its process in order to adhered more complexes assemblies - used as tools - such as dihedral which are used to positions parts during bonding.

Then, Thales SESO manufactured interferometers for terrestrial applications using different materials - fused silica, Zerodur® - using molecular adherence for different applications. The double Fizeau interferometer presented in figure 3-2 is an example of assemblies manufactured. It has been manufactured using fused silica component. The angular tolerances obtained were 5″ and surfaces performances around λ/100 nmPTV. The figure 3-2 shows the optical components positioned on the base plate using molecular adhesion

Figure 3-2.

Double Fizeau interferometer

00002_PSISDG11852_118521N_page_5_1.jpg

For terrestrial applications, the mechanical resistance of the adherence does not need to be resistant. Indeed, on ground application there is no requirement concerning shock or vibration. Nevertheless, for space application, the constraint involved (thermal fatigue, vibration, etc) are very different from those encountered on Earth. Thus, Thales SESO continued to improve its process in order to improve mechanical resistance.

In the early 2000, in the frame of the Aladin program – mission including a space lidar to measure windspeed-, Thales SESO developed:

  • A Mie Fabry Perrot made out of fused silica plates and zerodur® spacer (MSPA)

  • And a Rayleigh fused silica “Double Channel” Fabry-Perot assembly (RSP) qualified for Space Application

This double cavity Fabry Perot (Figure 3-3) includes:

  • Double Fabry Perot with a difference of thickness of 80 nm between the two cavities. This Double Fabry-Perot has been realised on the same cavity.

  • 4 prisms, 4 waveplates and one lens completed the optical setup.

  • The Fabry-Perrot was also adhered on a base plate and its fixture. The complete assembly is shown on figure 3-3.

  • The molecular adherence was reinforced using an external glue joint

Figure 3-3.

Double Fabry Perot for the Aladin program [18]

00002_PSISDG11852_118521N_page_5_2.jpg

The main specification, which were achieved are:

  • Fabry Perot flatness of 2 areas of 26 mm diameter: 9 nm and 18 nm

  • Coating R = 65 ± 1%; absorption < 0.3%

  • Finesse 65 at 355 nm

  • Assembly is able to pass:

  • Static accelerations > 30 G on all axes

  • Thermal environment –20°C to 50°C.

Mission was launched in 2018 and the results according to ESA are very good (“ESA’s Aeolus satellite has been returning profiles of Earth’s winds since 3 September 2018, just after it was launched – and after months of careful testing these measurements are considered so good that the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts is now using them in their forecasts”).

Then in the frame of the LISA program, Thales SESO realized a cavity made with three mirror The stabilisation is based on the Pound Drever Hall or Tilt locking. The main part of this cavity is a cylinder of 138 mm length with a 95 mm diameter. Figure 3-4 shows the two flat surfaces of this cylinder 6 pieces, 7 and 2 are optically contacted. Piece 2 is a prism on which the mirrors 1 are optically contacted. A socket 5 is also contacted and on this support socket are cemented the sensors. With this cavity the goal is to obtain a frequency stability better than 10Hz/sqrt(Hz). The Finesse should be comprised between 10000 and 100000.

Figure 3-4.

Lisa program cavity [18]

00002_PSISDG11852_118521N_page_6_1.jpg

Finally, in the frame of the satellite EarthCARE mission, Thales SESO developed the ATLID Fabry-Perot which consists in an assembly made with Zerodur® and fused silica with a cavity under vacuum (see figure 3-5). The sealing of the vacuum cavity was also made using molecular adhesion. For this application, external glue joint was forbidden.

Figure 3-5.

ATLID Fabry-Perot

00002_PSISDG11852_118521N_page_7_1.jpg

With all this assemblies, Thales SESO qualified its molecular adherence process for space applications. However, shape of adhered surface was quite simple and mechanical resistance of assemblies obtained are around 1Mpa. Thus, the next step of its development was to adhere more complex geometries.

Through lot of collaborations with CNES and other partners, Thales SESO works on the development of cube corner assemblies using molecular adherence. This works lead to the spatial qualification of an hollow corner cube.

In the frame of the Meteorological Third Generation satellite (MTG) Thales SESO develop a large hollow lightweighted corner cube presented in Figure 3-6.

Figure 3-6.

The two corner cubes developed in the frame of MTG-IRS

00002_PSISDG11852_118521N_page_8_1.jpg

Figure 3-7.

Evolution of WFE under vacuum (red curve : pressure and blue curve : WFE)

00002_PSISDG11852_118521N_page_8_2.jpg

Indeed, the MTG-IRS interferometer is composed by two cube corner with very stringent specifications - twice stringent compared to the actual knowledge - with high stability, mechanical resistance in accordance with mechanical and thermal environment of fixed geostationary orbit with following optical performances:

  • Each angle of the cube corner need to be at 90°±1”

  • Wave Front Error (WFE) < 250 nm RMS

  • Mass < 250g

After lots of development and characterization [19], Thales SESO succeed to increase the mechanical resistance of the molecular adhesion by a factor five. The cube corner is composed by three fused silica mirrors adhered one to the other. The assembly is bonded onto a mechanical bracket.

The results is compliant with the optical and mass specifications:

  • WFE achieved is less than 250 nm RMS on Φ78mm

  • Total mass is 245g

Then, this cube corner has been fully qualified, which means it has been submitted to:

  • - Dynamic test:

  • 60 gRMS in sine test

  • Random solicitations

  • Shock solicitations (123g)

  • - Thermal test

  • o Between -12° and +40°

Moreover, the cube corner demonstrate during test a high WFE stability under vacuum as presented in the following figure.

4.

WHAT’S NEXT?

The main challenge now is to industrialize the production in order to manufactured series of corner cubes.

Industrialization of corner cubes need other improvements of molecular adherence, in order to have a repeatable process for series manufacturing. Today, each mirror of the corner cubes are perfectly prepared before adherence with very low WFE and angles at 90 ± 0.5″. The major difficulty comes from the adherence of the third mirror. Thus, the industrialization challenge will be focused on solving this issue.

REFERENCES

[1] 

Tong Q.Y., Gösele U., “Semiconductor wafer bonding: recent developments,” 101 –127 Google Scholar

[2] 

Kendall K., Kluwer Academic Publishers(2001). Google Scholar

[3] 

Berthold A., Vellekoop M., “IC-compatible silicon wafer-to-wafer bonding,” Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical, 60 208 –2011 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(97)01355-1 Google Scholar

[4] 

Laurent F., “MUSE Image Slicer: Test results on largest slicer ever manufactured,” in Proc. SPIE, 7018 –7030 (2008). Google Scholar

[5] 

Yu H.H., Suo Z., “A model of wafer bonding by elastic accommodation,” Journal of Mechanical Physics and Solids, 46 (5), 829 –844 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00100-2 Google Scholar

[6] 

Rayssac O., Olivier M., Stoemenos I., Cartier A.M., Aspar B., “Silicon-on-Insulator technology and devices X,” in proceedings series, PV01 –03 (2001). Google Scholar

[7] 

Tang Z., “Modelling the formation of spontaneous wafer direct bonding under low temperature,” Microelectronic Engineering, 85 1754 –1757 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2008.04.038 Google Scholar

[8] 

Liao G., Lin X., “Surface roughness modeling for silicon direct bonding,” IEEE transaction on components, packaging and manufacturing technology, 1 (8), 1171 –1177 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCPMT.2011.2155656 Google Scholar

[9] 

Lai S., Lin H., Yu C., “Effect of surface treatment on wafer direct bonding process,” Material Chemistry and Physics, 83 265 –272 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2003.09.024 Google Scholar

[10] 

Klier K., Zettlemoyer A.C., “Water at interface: Molecular structure and dynamics,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 58 (2), 216 –229 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(77)90139-4 Google Scholar

[11] 

Iler R. K., Wiley(1979). Google Scholar

[12] 

Cocheteau N., Maurel-Pantel A., Lebon F., Rosu I., Ait Zaid S., Savin Delarclause I., “Influence of process parameters on the mechanical resistance of direct bonded silica glasses,” Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 28 (10), 915 –934 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2013.876138 Google Scholar

[13] 

Kissinger G., Kissinger W., “Void-free silicon-wafer-bond strengthening in the 200-400°C range,” (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-4247(93)85009-5 Google Scholar

[14] 

Stengl R., Tan T., Gösele U., “A model for the silicon wafer bonding process,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 28 (10), 1735 –1741 (1977). Google Scholar

[15] 

Ventosa C., Rieutord, F., Libralesso, L., Morales, C., Fournel, F., Moriceau, H., “Hydrophilic low-temperature direct wafer bonding,” Journal of Applied Physics, 104 123524 –123526 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3040701 Google Scholar

[16] 

Ventosa C., Morales C., Libralesso L., Fournel F., Papon A.M., Lafond D., Moriceau H., Penot J. D., Rieutord F., “Mechanism of thermal silicon oxide direct wafer bonding,” Electrochemical and Solid States Letters, 12 (10), 375 (2009). Google Scholar

[17] 

Cocheteau N., “Caractérisation et modélisation d’une adherence moléculaire renforcée,” (2014). Google Scholar

[18] 

Fermé J.J., “Optical contacting,” Optical system Design, (2003). Google Scholar

[19] 

Cocheteau N., Du Jeu C., Voisin M., Maurel-Pantel A., “Shock and vibration tests of space light-weighted corner cubes manufactured with adherence process,” in Proc. SPIE, 111808B (2018). Google Scholar

[20] 

Fermé J.J., Gasc K., “High stability hollow cube corner,” in Proc. SPIE, 105661V (2017). Google Scholar
© (2021) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Natacha Cocheteau, Christian Du Jeu, Alizee Loarer, Patrick Robert, and Mailys Thorigny "Improvement of molecular adhesion for spatial applications at Thales SESO over the past 20 years", Proc. SPIE 11852, International Conference on Space Optics — ICSO 2020, 118521N (11 June 2021); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2599287
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
Back to Top