Impact of local variability on defect-aware process windows

Mark John Maslow; Hidetami Yaegashi; Andreas Frommhold; Guido Schiffelers; Felix Wahlisch; Gijsbert Rispens; Bram Slachter; Keisuke Yoshida; Arisa Hara; Noriaki Oikawa; Abhinav Pathak; Dorin Cerbu; Eric Hendrickx; Joost Bekaert

doi:10.1117/12.2514719

26 March 2019 Impact of local variability on defect-aware process windows

Mark John Maslow, Hidetami Yaegashi, Andreas Frommhold, Guido Schiffelers, Felix Wahlisch, Gijsbert Rispens, Bram Slachter, Keisuke Yoshida, Arisa Hara, Noriaki Oikawa, Abhinav Pathak, Dorin Cerbu, Eric Hendrickx, Joost Bekaert

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 10957, Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography X; 109570H (2019) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2514719
Event: SPIE Advanced Lithography, 2019, San Jose, California, United States

Abstract

CD-based process windows have been an analysis workhorse for estimating and comparing the robustness of semiconductor microlithography processes for more than 30 years. While tolerances for variation of CD are decreasing in step with the target CD size, the acceptable number of printed defects has remained flat (Hint: Zero) as the number of features increases quadratically. This disconnect between two key process estimators, CD variability and defect rate, must be addressed. At nodes that require EUV lithography, estimating the printed defects based solely on a Mean CD (“Critical Dimension”) process window is no longer predictive. The variability / distribution of the printed CDs must be engineered so that there are no failures amongst the billions of instances, rendering the Mean CD, often measured on just hundreds or thousands of instances, a poor predictor for outliers. A “defect-aware” process window, where the count of printed defects is considered in combination with more advanced statistical analysis of measured CD distributions can provide the needed predictability to determine whether a process is capable of sufficient robustness. Determining process robustness where stochastics and defects are taken into account can be simplified by determining the CD process margin. In this work we study dense contact hole arrays exposed with 0.33NA single exposure EUV lithography after both the lithography and etch steps. We describe a methodology for expanding the analysis of process windows to include more than the mean and 3σ of the data. We consider the skew and kurtosis of the distribution of measured CD results per focus-exposure condition and compare / correlate the measured CD process window results to the CD process margin.

Conference Presentation

Citation Download Citation

Mark John Maslow, Hidetami Yaegashi, Andreas Frommhold, Guido Schiffelers, Felix Wahlisch, Gijsbert Rispens, Bram Slachter, Keisuke Yoshida, Arisa Hara, Noriaki Oikawa, Abhinav Pathak, Dorin Cerbu, Eric Hendrickx, and Joost Bekaert "Impact of local variability on defect-aware process windows", Proc. SPIE 10957, Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography X, 109570H (26 March 2019); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2514719

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available