Visual assessment of breast density using Visual Analogue Scales: observer variability, reader attributes and reading time

Teri Ang; Elaine F. Harkness; Anthony J. Maxwell; Yit Y. Lim; Richard Emsley; Anthony Howell; D. Gareth Evans; Susan Astley; Soujanya Gadde

doi:10.1117/12.2253797

10 March 2017 Visual assessment of breast density using Visual Analogue Scales: observer variability, reader attributes and reading time

Teri Ang, Elaine F. Harkness, Anthony J. Maxwell, Yit Y. Lim, Richard Emsley, Anthony Howell, D. Gareth Evans, Susan Astley, Soujanya Gadde

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 10136, Medical Imaging 2017: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment; 1013608 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2253797
Event: SPIE Medical Imaging, 2017, Orlando, Florida, United States

Abstract

Breast density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer and has potential use in breast cancer risk prediction, with subjective methods of density assessment providing a strong relationship with the development of breast cancer. This study aims to assess intra- and inter-observer variability in visual density assessment recorded on Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) among trained readers, and examine whether reader age, gender and experience are associated with assessed density. Eleven readers estimated the breast density of 120 mammograms on two occasions 3 years apart using VAS. Intra- and inter-observer agreement was assessed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and variation between readers visualised on Bland-Altman plots. The mean scores of all mammograms per reader were used to analyse the effect of reader attributes on assessed density. Excellent intra-observer agreement (ICC>0.80) was found in the majority of the readers. All but one reader had a mean difference of <10 percentage points from the first to the second reading. Inter-observer agreement was excellent for consistency (ICC 0.82) and substantial for absolute agreement (ICC 0.69). However, the 95% limits of agreement for pairwise differences were -6.8 to 15.7 at the narrowest and 0.8 to 62.3 at the widest. No significant association was found between assessed density and reader age, experience or gender, or with reading time. Overall, the readers were consistent in their scores, although some large variations were observed. Reader evaluation and targeted training may alleviate this problem.

Conference Presentation

Citation Download Citation

Teri Ang, Elaine F. Harkness, Anthony J. Maxwell, Yit Y. Lim, Richard Emsley, Anthony Howell, D. Gareth Evans, Susan Astley, and Soujanya Gadde "Visual assessment of breast density using Visual Analogue Scales: observer variability, reader attributes and reading time", Proc. SPIE 10136, Medical Imaging 2017: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 1013608 (10 March 2017); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2253797

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available